The comparison of complex load sequences tested at several stress levels by fractographic examination
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The Australian Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO) is currently assessing the fatigue life of the F/A-18 aircraft amongst other activities. Projects include full-scale testing as well as coupon test programs. One of the coupon test programs recently completed at DSTO was undertaken to evaluate fatigue performance under a variety of aircraft operational flight profiles. The program consisted of six test phases representing four different reference stress levels with the fifth phase designed to evaluate the effect of overload spikes on fatigue life and the sixth phase designed to evaluate material batch effects. While six loading sequences or spectra were evaluated in the test program only two were tested in all five phases. The coupons were manufactured from the aluminium alloy 7050-T7451 and were representative of the material and geometry of a typical fatigue critical part of the F/A-18 aircraft structure. A minimum of five specimens were tested for at least the two spectra in each of the first four phases. A minimum of three specimens was used in phases five and six. Consequently, more than 120 specimens in total were tested and 50 examined fractographically in this test program. This paper presents a summary of both the total life results as well as the crack growth rates for these specimens. Other aspects considered include the influence of the surface finish of the coupons and the identification of the nature of the crack initiation. This test program allowed two quite different spectra to be compared at several reference stress levels to determine the relative severity of each. Also sufficient numbers of specimens were tested to allow trends and scatter in the data to be fully evaluated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Engineering and Material Science Research · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation · Advanced Sensor Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Molent L, Ogden R, Pell R. F/A-18 FS488 bulkhead fatigue coupon test program. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, DSTO-TR-0941, Australia; 2000
2. Molent L, Mills T, Pell R. F/A-18 FS488 bulkhead fatigue coupon test program – part 2. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, DSTO-TR-1464, July; 2003
3. Pell RA, Molent L, Green AJ. The fractographical comparison of F/A-18 aluminium alloy 7050-T7451 bulkhead representative coupons tested under two fatigue load spectra at several stress levels. DSTO-TR-1547, February; 2004
4. Dickinson T, Molent L. Validation of fatigue damage models used for F/A-18 life assessment using fatigue coupon test results. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, DSTO-TR-0940, Australia; 2000
5. White P, Barter S, Molent L. Probabilistic fracture prediction based on aircraft specific fatigue test data. In: Proceedings of the 6th joint FAA/DoD/NASA aging aircraft conference, San Diego; 2002
6. Molent L, Mau VT. Validation against coupon test results of the fatigue damage model CI89 for F/A-18 aft fuselage and empennage spectra. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, DSTO-TR-1292, Australia; 2002
7. Aktepe B, Dickinson T. Coupon tests to determine the influence of buffet detected at the F/A-18 wing root. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, DSTO-TR-0924, Australia; 2000
8. Simpson DL, Landry N, Roussel J, Molent L, Graham AD, Schmidt N. The Canadian and Australian F/A-18 international follow-on structural test project. In: Proceedings of the ICAS 2002 congress, Canada; 2002
9. Adams PS, Keys II GS, Schutte RE, Smith DJ. F/A-18 Hornet structural appraisal of fatigue effects (SAFE) software manual – final report. McDonnell Aircraft Company, MDC B2027, USA, October; 1990
10. Molent L, Ogden R, editors. Review of RAAF F/A-18 ‘structural appraisal of fatigue effects’ (SAFE) version 112, vol. 1: detailed review. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, DSTO-TR-0381/1, Australia; 1998
11. Ghidella JR, Molent L, Madley WB. A comprehensive guide to the fatigue damage assessment computer program CI89, DSTO-TR-1506, October; 2003
12. Finney JM. Coupon fatigue test comparisons of US and Australian F/A-18 bulkhead sequences. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, DSTO-TM- 546, Australia; 1991
13. Barter SA, Bishop B, Clark G. Defect assessment on F/A-18 488 bulkhead tested at ARL. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Aircraft Material Report 125, Australia; 1991
14. Barter SA. Fractographic inspection of the cracking FT488/2 removed at program 79. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, DSTO-TN-0170, Australia; 1998