journal article·2010-09

Assessment of stable tearing on fatigue fracture surfaces

Mohd Fairuz Ab Rahman, Reza D. Mohammed, Xiaobo Yu, Qianchu Liu, Graham Clark

Engineering Failure Analysis· Volume 17· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Fatigue fracture surfaces in a range of structural metals sometimes exhibit bands, visible as dull crescent-shaped regions which contrast to the “bright” background fatigue surface. Such bands are believed to be created within a single load cycle under either constant-amplitude or variable-amplitude load conditions. Microscopically, crack advance by tearing has similarity to the final unstable fracture of the component, with the difference that the tearing is stable: it arrests after a certain distance of crack front advance, which is then followed by further fatigue crack growth. Multiple stable tearing bands, separated by regions created by fatigue crack growth, may be visible on a single fracture surface, to the extent that they may even make up the majority of the fracture surface area. Post-failure analysis of fracture surfaces often relies on quantitative fractography to relate various crack-front progression markings to specific loads in the load history, in order to estimate the crack growth history in the component. Matching this data to predicted crack growth, however, is complicated by the fact that stable tearing is not included in fatigue predictive models, and so the presence of significant tearing can greatly complicate the derivation of a crack growth history which can be matched to a crack growth model. The post-failure analysis of fracture surfaces is particularly difficult in cases where the load history record is poor, and that process has been observed to be much more difficult when significant tearing is present. Several empirical models and concepts have been proposed to assist with post-failure analysis of tearing, but as yet we do not have a good understanding of the parameters which influence both the onset and the arrest of the tearing, and the factors which control crack shape change as tearing progresses. As a result, the interpretation of tearing on service fracture surfaces remains difficult. This paper reviews the existing empirical models for tearing analysis, and describes a series of tests which produced tearing in an aircraft aluminium alloy, with the aim of developing a better understanding of these fracture surface features. The analysis of the tearing shapes indicates that one of the empirical models may have broad value as an engineering analysis tool, since it correlates reasonably well with tearing characteristics in these tests. The study reveals that the stress intensity factor is one of the key controlling parameters in tearing onset and arrest, although simple methods for estimation of relevant stress intensity values are problematic because of the key role of crack front curvature. The main conclusions relate to the notable differences between tearing under constant-amplitude and variable-amplitude loading. The constant-amplitude conditions confer some resistance to stable tearing, and this is believed to result from the high loading prior to tear onset; several mechanisms could be involved. This research is part of a program which is developing improved analytical and prognostic models for stable tearing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
2. Fractographic techniques for the assessment of aircraft component cracking
3. Analysis and interpretation of aircraft component defects using quantitative fractography
4. Byrnes R, Sharp PK, Goldsmith NT, Clark G. Modelling of stable tearing during fatigue crack growth of 7050 aluminium alloy. Defence Science and Technology Organisation DSTO, Technical Report DSTO-TR-1032, Victoria; 2000.
5. Recovery of the RAAF MB326H – the tale of an ageing trainer fleet
6. Barter SA, Sharp PK, Clark G. The identification of fatigue critical regions during fatigue testing of Macchi MB326H centre section lower booms. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference fracture. Sydney: Elsevier; 1997. p. 447–56.10.1016/B978-0-08-042820-8.50054-6 ↗
7. A growth model for catastrophic cracking in an RAAF aircraft10.1016/1350-6307(96)00014-3 ↗
8. Influence of initial defect conditions on structural fatigue in RAAF aircraft
9. Hudson CM, Hardrath HF. Investigation of the effects of variable-amplitude loadings on fatigue crack propagation patterns. National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA, Technical Note D-1803, Langley; 1963.
10. Some observations and measurements on mixed fatigue/tensile crack growth in aluminium alloys10.1016/0036-9748(76)90157-5 ↗
11. Causes of mixed fatigue–tensile-crack growth and significance of microscopic crack behaviour10.1179/mt.1978.5.1.351 ↗
12. Mechanisms of overload effect on fatigue crack propagation in aluminium alloys10.1016/0013-7944(78)90021-8 ↗
13. Vlasveld JA, Schijve J. Tongue-shaped crack extension during fatigue of high strength aluminium alloys. Delft University of Technology, Report LR-279, Delft; 1979.
14. On the mechanism of mixed fatigue–tensile crack growth10.1016/0025-5416(81)90149-X ↗
15. Liu Q, Hamel P, Hu W, Sharp PK, Lahousse A, Clark G. Modelling of stable tearing in aircraft structures. Defence Science and Technology Organisation DSTO, Technical Report DSTO-TR-1657, Victoria; 2005.
16. Determination of the fatigue crack-growth rate from the fractographic analysis of a specimen representing the aircraft wing skin10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.008 ↗
17. Some results of the examination of aluminium alloy specimen fracture surfaces
18. Schijve J, de Rijk P. The crack propagation in two aluminium alloys in an indoor and an outdoor environment under random and programmed load sequences. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Technical Report M 2156, Amsterdam; 1965.10.1016/B978-1-4831-9818-7.50022-3 ↗
19. Schijve J, Jacobs FA, Tromp PJ. Environmental effects on crack growth in flight-simulation tests on 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 material. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Technical Report 76104 U, Amsterdam; 1976.
20. Fractographic investigation of the ductility of fracture in aluminium and titanium alloys10.1007/BF01527794 ↗
21. Pearson S. Fatigue crack propagation experiments on vacuum remelted FV 535 steel. Royal Aircraft Establishment, Technical Report 68232, Farnborough; 1968.
22. Fatigue crack growth behaviour of two contrasting titanium alloys10.1016/0142-1123(95)98943-W ↗
23. Effect of mean stress on the rate of growth of fatigue cracks in sheet materials10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1962_004_006_02 ↗
24. Hardrath HF, McEvily AJ. Engineering aspects of fatigue crack propagation. In: Proceedings of the crack propagation symposium. Cranfield: College of Aeronautics; 1962. p. 231–70.
25. Fatigue damage accumulation and incompatible crack front orientation10.1016/0013-7944(74)90022-8 ↗
26. Application of modern aluminium alloys to aircraft10.1016/0376-0421(95)00004-6 ↗
27. Dowling · 2007
28. Anderson · 2005
29. ASTM E 561 – 08. Standard test method for K–R curve determination. Pennsylvania: ASTM International; 2007. p. 593–611.
30. Hertzberg · 1996
31. Experimental fracture mechanics: strain energy density criterion
32. Discreteness and self-similarity of failure in stable fatigue crack growth10.1007/BF00767610 ↗
33. Analytical modelling of fatigue crack propagation10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00234.x ↗
34. Significance of fatigue stress intensity in fracture toughness testing10.1007/BF00023340 ↗