Materials testing of ruptured lead lined tank and lead pipe
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This work has studied the cause of failure in a ruptured lead lined tank and lead pipe for chemical treatment of aluminium aircraft parts. The fracture surface, microstructure and strength of the lead and the effect of welding on the microstructure and strength of the lead in service have been investigated. The cause of the failure was identified to be creep and stress rupture, due to inadequate design and material properties. Experimental techniques of optical and scanning electron microscopy, microprobe analysis, tensile testing and hardness testing were used. Recommendations are made for possible measures for avoiding future failures of similar components.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Worcester AW, O'Reilly JT. Lead and lead alloys. In: Metals handbook, vol. 2. 10th ed. Properties and selection: nonferrous alloys and special-purpose materials. Materials Park (OH): ASM International, 1990. p. 543–56.
2. BS 334. Specification for compositional limits of chemical lead. London: British Standard Institution; 1982.
3. Ryder DA, Davis TJ, Brough I, Hutchings FR. General practice in failure analysis. In: Metals handbook, vol. 10. 8th ed. Failure analysis and prevention. Metals Park (OH): American Society for Metals; 1975. p. 10–29.
4. Fee A. Selection and industrial applications of hardness tests. In: ASM handbook, vol. 8, mechanical testing and evaluation. Materials Park (OH): ASM International, 2000. p. 260–77.
5. Tobolski EL, Fee A. Macroindentation hardness testing. In: ASM handbook, vol. 8, mechanical testing and evaluation. Materials Park (OH): ASM International, 2000. p. 203–20.
6. Knechtel HE, Kindle WF, McCall JL, Buchheit RD. Metallographic methods. In: Metals handbook, vol. 8. 8th ed. Metallography, structures and phase diagrams. Metals Park (OH): American Society for Metals; 1973. p. 1–14.
7. Samuels LE. Principles of technique selection in mechanical polishing. In: Metals handbook, vol. 8. 8th ed. Metallography, structures and phase diagrams. Metals Park (OH): American Society for Metals, 1973. p. 14–26.
8. DiMartini C. Metallographic technique for lead and lead alloys. In: Metals handbook, vol. 8. 8th ed. Metallography, structures and phase diagrams. Metals Park (OH): American Society for Metals; 1973. p. 132–4.
9. Annual book of ASTM standards, vol. 03.01. Standard test method for macroetching metals and alloys. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM); 2000. p. 391.
10. Metals handbook, vol. 7. 8th ed. Atlas of microstructures of industrial alloys. Metals Park (OH): American Society for Metals; 1972. p. 298.
11. Kerlins V. Modes of fracture. In: Metals handbook, vol. 12. 9th ed. Fractography. Metals Park (OH): ASM International; 1987. p. 12–71.10.31399/asm.hb.v12.a0001831 ↗
12. X-ray measurement of surface stress of U–0.75wt%Ti alloy rods10.1016/0022-5088(89)90374-3 ↗