journal article·2025-08Open access

Additively manufactured GRCop-42 copper-alloy combustion chamber failure analysis: The role of build interruptions

Gabriel Demeneghi, Benjamin Williams, Colton Katsarelis, William Tilson, Paul Gradl

Abstract

During hot-fire testing, an additively manufactured (AM) Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) GRCop-42 rocket engine combustion chamber failed, providing a case study for proper AM process rigor, particularly for builds with interruptions. This paper describes test day events, chamber manufacturing and post processing, and material evaluations used for understanding failure root cause. The chamber failure occurred at a build interruption location (witness line). Metallographic analysis of the failed chamber and adjacent chambers from the same build revealed excessive porosity, three orders of magnitude higher than typical GRCop-42, concentrated near the witness lines. This porosity reduced tensile strength and elongation, contributing to the failure. In contrast, test bars emulating build interruptions demonstrated no reduction in strength, elongation, or fatigue life, confirming that properly executed restart procedures do not inherently weaken GRCop-42 components. The failure likely resulted from a cascade of events, highlighting the need for stringent process controls in AM.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Metal additive manufacturing for propulsion applications
2. GRCop-42 Development and Hot-fire Testing Using Additive Manufacturing Powder Bed Fusion for Channel-cooled Combustion Chambers
3. Additive manufacturing of copper and copper alloys10.31399/asm.hb.v24.a0006579 ↗
4. D.L. Ellis, H.R. Gray, M. Nathel, Aerospace structural materials handbook supplement grcop-84, 2001.
5. D.L. Ellis, G.M. Michal, Precipitation strengthened high strength, high conductivity Cu-Cr-Nb alloys produced by chill block melt spinning, 1989.
6. D.S. Scannapieco, J.J. Lewandowski, R.B. Rogers, D.L. Ellis, In-situ alloying of GRCop-42 via additive manufacturing: Precipitate analysis, in “NASA TM,” 2020.
7. D. L. Ellis, GRCop-84: A high-temperature copper alloy for high-heat-flux applications, 2005.
8. Size effects on microstructure and mechanical properties of additively manufactured copper–chromium–niobium alloy10.1016/j.msea.2021.141511 ↗
9. Comparison of GRCop-84 to other Cu alloys with high thermal conductivities10.1007/s11665-007-9175-3 ↗
10. Progress in additively manufactured copper-alloy GRCop-84, GRCop-42, and bimetallic combustion chambers for liquid rocket engines
11. K.G. Cooper, J.L. Lydon, M.D. LeCorre, Z.C. Jones, D.S. Scannapieco, D.L. Ellis, B.A. Lerch, Three-dimensional printing GRCop-42, 2018.
12. Effects of Build Interruption and Restart Procedure on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Al-Si-10Mg10.1007/s11665-022-07217-1 ↗
13. Effect of build interruption during laser powder bed fusion process on structural integrity of Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107626 ↗
14. Effects of process interruptions on the microstructure and tensile properties of AlSi10Mg parts manufactured by Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion10.1016/j.procir.2020.09.035 ↗
15. On the influence of process interruptions during additive manufacturing on the fatigue resistance of AlSi12
16. Impact of a process interruption on tensile properties of SS 316L parts and hybrid parts produced with selective laser melting10.1007/s00170-019-03560-1 ↗
17. Fundamental aspects of hot isostatic pressing: An overview10.1007/s11661-000-0078-2 ↗
18. E. C. a. others, Test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, ASTM Int., 2011.
19. Directed energy deposition GRCop-42 copper alloy: Characterization and size effects10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111035 ↗
20. GRCop-42: Comparison between laser powder bed fusion and laser powder direct energy deposition
21. G. Demeneghi, P. Gradl, J. R. Mayeur, and K. Hazeli, Size effect characteristics and influences on fatigue behavior of laser powder bed fusion of thin wall GRCop-42 copper alloy, Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 7, p. e28679, Apr 15 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28679.10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28679 ↗
22. A. E. Whitt, David; Gradl, Paul, The GRCop story: The development, production and Additive Manufacturing of NASA’s rocket engine alloys. Metal Additive Manuf, 2023.
23. Solidification characteristics and precipitation behavior of the Cu–Cr–Nb alloys10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.014 ↗
24. K.R. Anderson, “Effects of thermal and mechanical processing on microstructures and desired properties of particle-strengthened Cu-Cr-Nb alloys, 2000.
25. Fracture characteristics and heat treatment of laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured GRCop-84 copper10.1016/j.msea.2021.141690 ↗
26. Microstructure and properties of Cu-Cr-Nb alloy with high strength, high electrical conductivity and good softening resistance performance at elevated temperature10.1016/j.msea.2019.02.036 ↗
27. Copper-based alloys for structural high-heat-flux applications: a review of development, properties, and performance of Cu-rich Cu–Cr–Nb alloys10.1080/09506608.2020.1821485 ↗
28. A.Y. Al-Maharma, S. P. Patil, and B. Markert, “Effects of porosity on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured components: a critical review,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 7, no. 12, 2020, doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d.10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d ↗
29. Characterization of bulk to thin wall mechanical response transition in powder bed AM10.1108/RPJ-10-2015-0146 ↗
30. The Effectiveness of Hot Isostatic Pressing for Closing Porosity in Titanium Parts Manufactured by Selective Electron Beam Melting10.1007/s11661-016-3429-3 ↗
31. Hot isostatic pressing in metal additive manufacturing: X-ray tomography reveals details of pore closure
32. Analysis of complex internal channels on high-cycle fatigue behavior of LBPF GRCop-4210.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109335 ↗
33. Advancement of extreme environment additively manufactured alloys for next generation space propulsion applications10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.06.035 ↗
34. Effect of Surface Finish and Temperature on Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of GRCop‐42
35. Additively manufactured IN718 in thin wall and narrow flow channel geometries: Effects of post-processing and wall thickness on tensile and fatigue behaviors