journal article·2013-09

Assessment on failure pressure of high strength pipeline with corrosion defects

Bin Ma, Jian Shuai, Dexu Liu, Kui Xu

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract An accurate prediction on the failure pressure of line pipe is very important in the engineering design and integrity assessment of oil and gas transmission pipelines. This paper analytically investigates the failure pressure of line pipes with or without corrosion defects, and focus on the high strength steels. Based on von Mises strength failure criterion, a classic strength failure criterion, the failure pressure of end-capped and defect-free pipe p M is theoretically deduced with the strain hardening material. In order to derive a general solution for corrosion defect assessment of high strength pipelines, an extensive series of finite element analyses on various elliptical corrosion defects was performed. Finally, a new formula for predicting the failure pressure of corroded pipe in the material of high strength steels is formulated, based on the FE models and p M , and is validated using 79 groups of full-scale burst test data, which contain the low, middle and high strength pipeline. The results indicated that the proposed formula for predicting the failure pressure is closely matches the experimental data for the high strength steels.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhuang Chuan-jing, Feng Yao-rong. The development and its future research direction of grade X80 pipeline steel in China. In: International technology conference of X80 grade steel pipeline. Beijing; 2004. p. 22–32.
2. TSO LiangTeng, Peng-Hsiang Chang. A study of residual stresses in multi-pass girth-butt welded pipes. Int J Ves Pip 1997;74:59–70.10.1016/S0308-0161(97)00091-4 ↗
3. Average shear stress yield criterion and its application to plastic collapse analysis of pipelines10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.06.001 ↗
4. Analysis on the latest assessment criteria of ASME B31G-2009 for the remaining strength of corroded pipelines
5. Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas pipelines10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00005-X ↗
6. Strength criteria and analytic predictions of failure pressure in line pipes
7. Prediction of failure pressure in corroded pipelines based on non-linear finite element analysis
8. Structural integrity evaluation of X52 gas pipes subjected to external corrosion defects using the SINTAP procedure10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.02.023 ↗
9. ANSI/ASME B31G-1984. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. New York; 1984.
10. ASME B31G-1991. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipeline. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1991.
11. ASME B31G-2009. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2009.
12. Recommended Practice. DET NORSKE VERITAS, DNV-RP-F101. Corroded Pipelines; 2004.
13. Denny R. Stephens, Brian N. Leis. Development of alternative criterion for residual strength of corrosion defects in moderate-to-high-toughness pipe. Battelle Energy Products Division, 505 King Ave Columbus, Ohio 43201-2693. In: 2000 international pipeline conference, vol. 2. ASME 2000.10.1115/IPC2000-192 ↗
14. Kiefner JF, Vieth PH. A Modified criterion for evaluation the remaining strength of corroded pipe. Final report on project PR 3-805 to the Pipeline Research Committee of the American Gas Association; 1989.10.55274/R0011347 ↗
15. Fu B, Batte AD. New Methods for assessing the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. In: Proceedings of EPRG/PRCI 12th biennial joint technical meeting on pipeline research, Groningen, The Netherlands. Paper # 28; 1999.
16. Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas pipelines10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00005-X ↗
17. Zhu XK, Leis BN. Influence of the Yield-To-Tensile Strength Ratio on Failure assessment of Corroded Pipelines. In: Proceedings of ASME-PVP 2003: pressure vessels and piping conference. Cleveland, Ohio (USA); July 20–24, 2003.10.1115/PVP2003-2004 ↗
18. Hollomon · Trans AIME · 1945 · 162 · 268
19. The Baushinger effect, masing model and the Ramberg–Osgood relation for cyclic deformation in metals10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00465-6 ↗
20. Leis BN, Stephens DR. An alternative approach to assess the integrity of corroded line pipe – Part I: current status and Part II: alternative criterion. In: Proceedings of the seventh international offshore and polar engineering conference, vol. IV. Honolulu (USA); May 25–30, 1997. p. 624–41.
21. Chouchaoui BA, Pick RJ, Yost DB. Burst pressure predictions of line pipe containing single corrosion pits using finite element method. Pipeline-Technology. ASME OMAE 1992; vol. V-A; 203–10.
22. Behavior of circumferentially aligned corrosion pits10.1016/0308-0161(94)90052-3 ↗
23. Bjornoy OH, Ole Rengard, Stein Fredheim. Residual strength of dented Pipelines, DNV Test Results. In: Proceedings of the 10th international offshore and polar engineering conference seattle. USA; May 28–June 2, 2000; ISBN I-880653-46-X (Set).
24. Mok DRB, Pick RJ, Glover AG. Behavior of line pipe with long external corrosion. MP 1990;29(5):75–9.
25. Adilson C, Benjamin Renaldo D. Vieira, Jose Luis F, et al. Burst tests on pipeline with long external corrosion, vol. 2. International pipeline conference; 2000.10.1115/IPC2000-193 ↗
26. Cronin Duane S, Roberts K. Andrew, Pick Roy J. Assessment of long corrosion grooves in line pipe. In: Department of mechanical engineering. International pipeline conference, vol. 1. ASME. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo; 1996.
27. Daruo Braga Noronha Jr, Asilson Carvalho Benjimin. Finite element models for the prediction of the failure pressure of pipeline with long corrosion defects. In: Proceedings of IPC‘02, 4th international pipeline conference. Canada; September 29–October 3, 2002.10.1115/IPC2002-27191 ↗
28. Bursting of line pipe with long external corrosion10.1016/0308-0161(91)90015-T ↗
29. ADVANTICA. corrosion assessment guidance for high strength steels (phase1). .
30. PART 3: Burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss10.1111/j.1747-1567.2006.00109.x ↗