journal article·2020-08

Fracture criteria applied to numerical simulation of blowout preventer ram shearing

Lei Zhu, Segen F. Estefen, Marcelo Igor Lourenço

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The interest in predicting the force required for a subsea blowout preventer (BOP) to cut and isolate the drilling pipe has been growing since the Macondo accident. In previous research, numerical simulation using the nonlinear finite element method combined with the blowout preventer (BOP) shear test has been a common approach. As various fracture criteria exist, the selection and application of a suitable fracture criterion are of great interest to achieve a successful ram shearing simulation. In this paper, the CrashFEM criterion, previously employed in crashworthiness simulation, is first adopted in BOP ram shearing simulation to capture the onset of damage to the pipe. The Johnson-Cook (J-C) and Modified Mohr-Coulomb (MMC) criteria are utilized to carry out a comparative study. The TRIP 690 experimental data are used to derive the fracture parameters. These parameters enable the building of numerical models based on boundary and loading conditions for the BOP shear test. Based on the numerical model, a mesh sensitivity study is carried out. The simulation results using refined meshes show that the shearing forces predicted by the CrashFEM and MMC criteria are generally consistent with the experimental data. The results from the three criteria indicate differences originating from the shape of the fracture limit curve, the damage initiation concerning the equivalent plastic strain accumulation, and the damage distribution in the shearing area. These findings are explained in detail in the paper. A comprehensive application of the CrashFEM criteria for BOP shearing simulation is presented and recommendations are provided about the selection of suitable fracture criteria.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. R. Childs, G. Sattler, J. Williamson, Shear Ram Capabilities Study for U.S. Minerals Management Service, Requisition No: 3-4025-1001., West Eng. Serv. Inc., 2004. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/tap-technical-assessment-program/463aa.pdf (accessed October 21, 2019).
2. Forensic Examination of Deepwater Horizon Blowout Preventer, Final Report for United States Department of the Interior, Report No. EP030842, DET Nor. Verit, 2011. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/research-guidance-manuals-or-best-practices/regulations-and-guidance/dnvreportvolumeii.pdf (accessed October 21, 2019).
3. R. Childs, G., Sattler, J., and Williamson, Mini Shear Study for U.S. Minerals Management Service, Requisition No: 2-1011-1003, 2002. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/tap-technical-assessment-program/455aa.pdf (accessed October 21, 2019).
4. Estimation of shear force for blind shear ram blowout preventers10.17515/resm2014.02st1225 ↗
5. E. Koutsolelos, Numerical Analysis of a Shear Ram and Experimental Determination of Fracture Parameters, MIT Thesis, 2012.
6. J.A. Hoefler, An evaluation of shear testing guidance and the effects of external and operational loading on pipe shearability using the finite element analysis FEA method, in: Offshore Technol. Conf. Proc., Houston, Texas, USA, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4043/28698-ms.10.4043/28698-MS ↗
7. L. Zhu, S.F. Estefen, Nilo de Moura Jorge, J.H. Chujutalli, M.I.L. Souza, Numerical simulation of shear ram performance, in: 37th Int. Conf. Ocean. Offshore Arct. Eng., Madrid, Spain, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-78100.10.1115/OMAE2018-78100 ↗
8. B.R. Tulimilli, P. Naik, A. Chakraborty, S. Sawant, A. Whooley, Design study of BOP shear rams based on validated simulation model and sensitivity studies, in: 33rd Int. Conf. Ocean. Offshore Arct. Eng., San Francisco, California, USA, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-24305.10.1115/OMAE2014-24305 ↗
9. A.W. Bhaskar Rao Tulimilli, Pramod Naik, Arindam Chakraborty, Sourabh Sawant, Experimental and numerical investigation of Bop shear ram performance, in: 33rd Int. Conf. Ocean. Offshore Arct. Eng., San Francisco, California, USA, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-24714.10.1115/OMAE2014-24714 ↗
10. Study of the damage and failure of the shear ram of the blowout preventer in the shearing process10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.08.025 ↗
11. K.N. Kofiani, E. Koutsolelos, T. Wierzbicki, Shear-generated fracture in predicting oil leak in accidents involving sinking platforms, in: 21st Int. Offshore Polar Eng. Conf., Maui, Hawaii, USA, 2011.
12. Models for ductile damage and fracture prediction in cold bulk metal forming processes: a review10.1007/s12289-015-1262-7 ↗
13. A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes10.1115/1.3601204 ↗
14. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
15. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
16. An extended model for void growth and coalescence10.1016/S0022-5096(00)00019-3 ↗
17. Fracture criteria identification using an inverse technique method and blanking experiment10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00049-8 ↗
18. Failure analysis of a pressure vessel subjected to an internal blast load10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.04.037 ↗
19. A digital image correlation analysis on a sheet AA6061-T6 bi-failure specimen to predict static failure10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.03.011 ↗
20. Ductile fracture modeling of initiation and propagation in sheet-metal blanking processes10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.179 ↗
21. A comparative study on various ductile crack formation criteria10.1115/1.1755244 ↗
22. On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006 ↗
23. A comprehensive failure model for crashworthiness simulation of aluminium extrusions10.1533/ijcr.2004.0289 ↗
24. Fracture criteria for automobile crashworthiness simulation of wrought aluminium alloy components10.1002/1521-4052(200109)32:9<712::AID-MAWE712>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
25. Damage accumulation and fracture initiation in uncracked ductile solids subject to triaxial loading10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.026 ↗
26. Constitutive modeling of void shearing effect in ductile fracture of porous materials10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.022 ↗
27. A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and Lode dependence10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004 ↗
28. Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture models10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.03.003 ↗
29. A comparative study of three groups of ductile fracture loci in the 3D space10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.12.023 ↗
30. C.L. Walters, Development of a punching technique for ductile fracture testing over a wide range of stress states and strain rates, MIT Thesis, 2009.
31. J. Chottin, E. Hug, M. Rachik, Damage accumulation in DP1000 steel sheets submitted to various stress states, in: 10th Int. Conf. Technol. Plast., Aachen, Germany, 2011.
32. Characterisation of the quasi-static flow and fracture behaviour of dual-phase steel sheets in a wide range of plane stress states10.1016/j.acme.2012.06.017 ↗
33. A.B. McCleney, S.T. Green, N.J. Mueschke, Modeling of subsea BOP shear and sealing ability under flowing conditions, in: Offshore Technol. Conf., Houston, Texas, USA, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4043/28906-MS.10.4043/28906-MS ↗
34. MCS-kenny Report: Assessment of BOP Stack Sequencing, Monitoring and Kick Technology, Detection, Document Number: 12-1841-DG-RPT-0003, 2013. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/tap-technical-assessment-program//713ae.pdf (accessed October 21, 2019).
35. Force prediction in blow-out preventer shearing of drill pipes10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.01.006 ↗
36. Edward H., T. Cole, BOP Shearing: FEA Modelling with void coalescence ductile fracture theory, in: Offshore Technol. Conf. Asia, Offshore Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4043/26422-MS.10.4043/26422-MS ↗
37. Failure prediction for advanced crashworthiness of transportation vehicles10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.04.004 ↗
38. C. Leppin, M. Kutscher, M. Feuerstein, G. Oberhofer, Fracture prediction for crashworthiness assessment of aluminum bumper systems, in: LS-DYNA Anwenderforum, Bamberg, 2008.
39. K. Isik, C. Soyarslan, H. Richter, A.E. Tekkaya, Analysis of formability of advanced high strength steel sheets with phenomenologically based failure criteria with separate treatment of instability, shear and normal fracture, in: 8th Eur. LS-DYNA Users Conf., Strasbourg, France, 2011.
40. H. Dell, H. Gese, L. Keßler, H. Werner, H. Hooputra, Continuos Failure Prediction Model for Nonlinear Load Paths in Successive Stamping and Crash Processes, in: SAE Tech. Pap. Ser., 2001. https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-1131.10.4271/2001-01-1131 ↗
41. Application of extended Mohr-Coulomb criterion to ductile fracture10.1007/s10704-009-9422-8 ↗
42. Abaqus analysis user’s manual 6.14, Dassault Systemes Simulia, 2014.
43. API-Standard-53, Blowout Prevention Equipment Systems for Drilling Wells (4th ed.), 2012.
44. Cameron, TL Offshore ram-type BOP, 2017. https://cameron.slb.com/products-and-services/drilling/pressure-control-equipment/ram-type-bops/tl-ram-type-bop (accessed October 11, 2017).
45. Mixed mode stable tearing of thin sheet AI 6061–T6 specimens: Experimental measurements and finite element simulations using a modified Mohr-Coulomb fracture criterion10.1007/s10704-010-9554-x ↗
46. Indentation of tubes under combined loading10.1016/0020-7403(88)90057-4 ↗
47. Modeling of plane strain ductile rupture10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00022-0 ↗
48. BOP Manufacturer Shear Information, West Eng. Serv. Inc., 2004. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/tap-technical-assessment-program//463ab.pdf (accessed October 21, 2019).
49. Xianping · 2014
50. Prediction of plane strain fracture of AHSS sheets with post-initiation softening10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.04.028 ↗
51. Ductile damage evolution under triaxial state of stress: Theory and experiments10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.003 ↗
52. Ductile fracture initiation and propagation modeling using damage plasticity theory10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.08.012 ↗