journal article·2024-07Open access

Experimental Demonstration of Reservoir Computing with Self‐Assembled Percolating Networks of Nanoparticles

Joshua B. Mallinson, Jamie K. Steel, Zachary E. Heywood, Sofie J. Studholme, Philip J. Bones, Simon A. Brown

Advanced Materials· Volume 36· Issue 29

Abstract

Abstract The complex self‐assembled network of neurons and synapses that comprises the biological brain enables natural information processing with remarkable efficiency. Percolating networks of nanoparticles (PNNs) are complex self‐assembled nanoscale systems that have been shown to possess many promising brain‐like attributes and which are therefore appealing systems for neuromorphic computation. Here experiments are performed that show that PNNs can be utilized as physical reservoirs within a nanoelectronic reservoir computing framework and demonstrate successful computation for several benchmark tasks (chaotic time series prediction, nonlinear transformation, and memory capacity). For each task, relevant literature results are compiled and it is shown that the performance of the PNNs compares favorably to that previously reported from nanoelectronic reservoirs. It is then demonstrated experimentally that PNNs can be used for spoken digit recognition with state‐of‐the‐art accuracy. Finally, a parallel reservoir architecture is emulated, which increases the dimensionality and richness of the reservoir outputs and results in further improvements in performance across all tasks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Neural dynamics and brain function

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology School of Physical and Chemical Sciences Te Kura Matū University of Canterbury Private Bag 4800 Christchurch 8140 New Zealand

Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Canterbury Private Bag 4800 Christchurch 8140 New Zealand

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/38/38400410.1088/0957-4484/24/38/384004 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41563-021-01099-910.1038/s41563-021-01099-9 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-021-24260-z10.1038/s41467-021-24260-z ↗
4. 10.1039/D0NH00693A10.1039/D0NH00693A ↗
5. Dale M. · 2016 · 49
6. 10.1088/2634-4386/ac433910.1088/2634-4386/ac4339 ↗
7. 10.1088/2634-4386/ac676a10.1088/2634-4386/ac676a ↗
8. 10.1109/TED.2017.276606310.1109/TED.2017.2766063 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41598-017-08244-y10.1038/s41598-017-08244-y ↗
10. 10.1126/sciadv.aaw843810.1126/sciadv.aaw8438 ↗
11. 10.1039/D2NA00121G10.1039/D2NA00121G ↗
12. 10.1039/D2NR07275K10.1039/D2NR07275K ↗
13. 10.1109/5.5835610.1109/5.58356 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.03.00510.1016/j.neunet.2019.03.005 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0109610.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01096 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.03402110.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.034021 ↗
17. 10.1162/netn_a_0012810.1162/netn_a_00128 ↗
18. 10.1038/nrn257510.1038/nrn2575 ↗
19. 10.1038/nrn321410.1038/nrn3214 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.123841110.1126/science.1238411 ↗
21. Jaeger H. · GMD Rep. · 2010 · 1 · 13
22. 10.1109/TNN.2007.89408210.1109/TNN.2007.894082 ↗
23. 10.35848/1347-4065/ab8d4f10.35848/1347-4065/ab8d4f ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20230614910.1002/adfm.202306149 ↗
25. 10.3389/fnano.2021.67579210.3389/fnano.2021.675792 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.11834410.1016/j.carbon.2023.118344 ↗
27. Kuncic Z. · 2020 · 1
28. Kuncic Z. · Adv. Phys. X · 2021 · 6
29. 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.07.00110.1016/j.neunet.2022.07.001 ↗
30. 10.1088/2634-4386/ac74da10.1088/2634-4386/ac74da ↗
31. Virtual or delay‐based reservoirs are created by time‐multiplexing the response of a single nonlinear dynamical node.[32]Rather than samplingNreal nodes simultaneously the single nonlinear dynamical node is sampledNtimes during each timestep (input value) while transiently responding to a masked input signal.
32. 10.1038/ncomms147610.1038/ncomms1476 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep0028710.1038/srep00287 ↗
34. 10.1038/nature2301110.1038/nature23011 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20110305310.1002/adma.201103053 ↗
36. 10.1017/S030500410003268010.1017/S0305004100032680 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.13680810.1103/PhysRevLett.111.136808 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.07540210.1103/PhysRevB.89.075402 ↗
39. 10.1007/978-3-540-74690-4_4810.1007/978-3-540-74690-4_48 ↗
40. 10.1109/TNN.2011.216177110.1109/TNN.2011.2161771 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12559-017-9463-710.1007/s12559-017-9463-7 ↗
42. 10.1109/JSTQE.2019.292917910.1109/JSTQE.2019.2929179 ↗
43. Ji Y. · 2016
44. Verstraeten D. · 2010 · 1
45. 10.1109/72.84674110.1109/72.846741 ↗
46. H.Jaeger Short Term Memory in Echo State Networks GMD Report Vol.152 GMD Forschungszentrum Informationstechnik Sankt Augustin Germany2001.
47. 10.7567/JJAP.55.1102B210.7567/JJAP.55.1102B2 ↗
48. 10.1038/ncomms236810.1038/ncomms2368 ↗
49. Larger L. · Phys. Rev. X · 2017 · 7
50. 10.1038/s41928-019-0313-310.1038/s41928-019-0313-3 ↗
51. 10.1002/adma.20210268810.1002/adma.202102688 ↗
52. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100321910.1371/journal.pcbi.1003219 ↗
53. R. F.Lyon ICASSP IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process IEEE New York1982 pp.1282–1285.
54. Mermelstein P. · 1976
55. M.Liberman R.Amsler K.Church E.Fox C.Hafner J.Klavans M.Marcus B.Mercer J.Pedersen P.Roossin D.Walker S.Warwick A.Zampolli TI 46‐Word LDC93S9 Linguistic Data Consortium Philadelphia PA1993.
56. 10.1038/s41598-019-56991-x10.1038/s41598-019-56991-x ↗
57. Z.Jackson C.Souza J.Flaks Y.Pan H.Nicolas A.Thite Jakobovski/free‐spoken‐digit‐dataset (FSDD)v1.0.10 https://github.com/Jakobovski/free‐spoken‐digit‐dataset(accessed: April 2023).
58. 10.1038/s41598-021-94975-y10.1038/s41598-021-94975-y ↗
59. Young S. · 2002
60. Speech Processing Transmission and Quality Aspects (STQ) ETSI ES 201 1082000 3 1.
61. 10.1007/978-3-031-34034-5_510.1007/978-3-031-34034-5_5 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.512078810.1063/1.5120788 ↗
63. 10.1109/SOCPAR.2009.9210.1109/SOCPAR.2009.92 ↗