journal article·2025-02Open access

Xolography for 3D Printing in Microgravity

Niklas Felix König, Marcus Reuter, Marvin Reuß, Christian Sebastian Fabian Kromer, Martin Herder, Yves Garmshausen, Baraa Asfari, Eric Israel, Lucíola Vasconcelos Lima, Nishit Puvati, Jannes Leonhard, Linos Madalo, Steffen Heuschkel, Marcus Engelhard, Yousef Arzhangnia, Dirk Radzinski

Advanced Materials· Volume 37· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract Xolography is a volumetric 3D printing technique utilizing intersecting light beams within a volume of photopolymer for a spatially controlled photopolymerization. Unlike layer‐based methods, Xolography creates structures continuously within a closed photopolymer vat, eliminating the prevalent need for support structures and allowing full geometrical freedom at high printing speeds. The volumetric working principle does not rely on gravity, making Xolography an outstanding technology for additive manufacturing under microgravity conditions as illustrated in a set of experiments during a parabolic flight campaign. The microgravity environment obviates the need for rheology control of resins, enabling the use of low‐viscosity formulations (e.g., 11 mPa s) while maintaining the fast and precise 3D printing of acrylic polymer resins and hydrogels. Xolography's speed and reliability facilitate rapid iterations of a print task between Earth's gravity and microgravity conditions. This capability positions Xolography as an ideal tool for material research and manufacturing in space, offering significant cost and efficiency advantages over traditional methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Interactive and Immersive Displays

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

xolo GmbH Volmerstraße 9B 12489 Berlin Germany

Funding

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41526-020-00130-810.1038/s41526-020-00130-8 ↗
2. Oman C. M. · 2003
3. 10.1115/1.405560310.1115/1.4055603 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c0019510.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00195 ↗
5. A.Owens O. D.Weck inSPACE Conferences and Exposition American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. Long Beach CA2016.
6. Trujillo A. E. · 2017
7. R.Crockett D.Peterson K.Cooper inProceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Austin TX August2000.
8. 10.1038/s41598-023-40018-710.1038/s41598-023-40018-7 ↗
9. 10.1108/RPJ-09-2016-014210.1108/RPJ-09-2016-0142 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00170-018-2827-710.1007/s00170-018-2827-7 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12217-020-09820-010.1007/s12217-020-09820-0 ↗
12. 10.1002/admt.20190050610.1002/admt.201900506 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.03.03010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.03.030 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-020-14630-410.1038/s41467-020-14630-4 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20190420910.1002/adma.201904209 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.aau711410.1126/science.aau7114 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41586-020-3029-710.1038/s41586-020-3029-7 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20230671610.1002/adma.202306716 ↗
19. 10.1002/admt.20240016210.1002/admt.202400162 ↗
20. 10.1002/smll.20240235610.1002/smll.202402356 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.oceram.2024.10065510.1016/j.oceram.2024.100655 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.06.04810.1016/j.actaastro.2023.06.048 ↗
23. 10.1002/adhm.20230044310.1002/adhm.202300443 ↗
24. 10.1042/BST2016006710.1042/BST20160067 ↗
25. 10.2494/photopolymer.26.56710.2494/photopolymer.26.567 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.03410.1016/j.dental.2006.06.034 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.eml.2021.10140310.1016/j.eml.2021.101403 ↗
28. 10.1021/la991548q10.1021/la991548q ↗
29. 10.1021/ie302313a10.1021/ie302313a ↗
30. Stokes G. G. · Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc. · 1851 · 9 · 8
31. If not stated otherwise source .stl files are created using free and open‐source software FreeCAD (under the LGPL‐2.0‐or‐later license) https://www.freecad.org(accessed: March 2023).
32. 10.1002/marc.20220087210.1002/marc.202200872 ↗
33. 10.1115/1.324266710.1115/1.3242667 ↗
34. As discussed in reference [15a] volumetric shrinkage of comparable urethane acrylate oligomer/monomer mixtures is well below 5%. With a typical resin density of 1.1 g cm−3 the expected shrinkage‐induced density change is expected to stay below 0.05 g cm−3.
35. Rodin's The Thinker; source .stl under CC BY(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:34343(accessed: September 2023).
36. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10418910.1016/j.addma.2024.104189 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0007410.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-023-39913-410.1038/s41467-023-39913-4 ↗
39. Space Shuttle; source .stl under CC BY(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3753094(accessed: September 2023).
40. Ariane 5; source .stl under CC BY‐SA(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by‐sa/3.0/) https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2903560(accessed: September 2023).
41. Astronaut; source .stl under CC BY‐NC‐ND 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by‐nc‐nd/4.0/) https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1278822(accessed: September 2023).
42. Dilution Ladder (adapted); source .stl under CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3312176(accessed: September 2023).
43. Y.Garmshausen M.Reuter M.Regehly N. F.König xolo GmbH WO2021089090A1 2022.