journal article·2014-07

Hybrid models for handling variability and uncertainty in probabilistic and possibilistic failure analysis of corroded pipes

Maneesh Singh, Tore Markeset

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The pipes carrying oil and gas are inspected for any damage that can lead to leakages and ruptures. Unfortunately, the data collected from these inspections is always inflicted with a number of imperfections, like variability, uncertainty and imprecision. These imperfections can be handled using the traditional probabilistic approach or the possibilistic approach. Both of these approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages. The probabilistic approach tends to give very low probability for events resulting from the low probability input values. This can often give a false sense of security, especially when the “weakest” link may cause a major accident. On the other hand the possibilistic approach is rather imprecise and may give over conservative and uneconomical recommendations. The recent advances in the field of fuzzy-probabilistic modelling offer an improvement in the way the calculations have been traditionally carried out by using the strengths of both techniques. This paper presents two different hybrid approaches for calculating the likelihood of failure of corroded pipes under internal pressure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. ANSI/ASME. ASME B31G–1991: Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1991.
2. Bell S. A beginner’s guide to uncertainty of measurement. Issue 2, National Physical Laboratory, Report No. 11; 1999.
3. ISO. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1993.
4. Taylor BN, Kuyatt CE. Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. NIST Technical Note 1297; 1994.10.6028/NIST.TN.1297 ↗
5. Prediction of remaining strength of corroded pressurised pipelines10.1016/S0308-0161(96)00081-6 ↗
6. Probabilistic estimation of remaining life of a pipeline in the presence of active corrosion defects10.1016/S0308-0161(98)00006-4 ↗
7. Reliability estimation of pressurised pipelines subject to localised corrosion defects10.1016/0308-0161(96)00009-9 ↗
8. Singh M, Markeset T. Handling of variability in probabilistic and possibilistic failure analysis of corroded pipes. Int J System Assurance Eng Manage [in print].
9. Simultaneous handling of variability and uncertainty in probabilistic and possibilistic failure analysis of corroded pipes10.1007/s13198-013-0202-5 ↗
10. Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:1(68) ↗
11. A fuzzy approach for the expression of uncertainty in measurement10.1016/S0263-2241(00)00036-1 ↗
12. Melchers · 2001
13. Burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss10.1111/j.1747-1567.2006.00109.x ↗
14. Uncertainty modeling in civil engineering with structural and reliability applications
15. 2D Monte Carlo versus 2D Fuzzy Monte Carlo health risk assessment10.1007/s00477-004-0209-1 ↗
16. Ayyub · 2006
17. Ross · 2004
18. Probability–possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities10.1023/B:REOM.0000032115.22510.b5 ↗
19. Baudrit C, Dubois D, Guyonnet D, Fargier H. Joint treatment of imprecision and randomness in uncertainty propagation. In: Proceedings of the information processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems, IPMU-2004, Perugia, Italy; 2004. p. 873–80.
20. Post-processing the hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:12(1750) ↗
21. Guyonnet D, Menard Y, Baudrit C, Dubois D. HyRisk – hybrid treatment of uncertainties in risk assessments. BRGM Report RP 53713, September 2005.