journal article·2018-08

Predicting failure in rubber membranes: An experimental-numerical approach

Bo Li, Venkata Rama Lakshmi Preethi Bahadursha, Michelle S. Hoo Fatt

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A material model to predict tearing of a rubber membrane in finite element analysis was developed. Using experimental data from uniaxial tension test and tearing of rubber sheets, we combined a cohesive traction law with a hyper-viscoelastic constitutive equation to create this material model. The resulting material model described hyper-viscoelastic behavior before damage, damage initiation, and damage evolution and consequent crack growth through a finite element mesh. The numerical simulations of tearing rubber sheets were found to be in good agreement with test data in terms of force-displacement response, onset of fracture and crack growth path. A key advantage of using this proposed material model is that there was no need to pre-define crack paths in the finite element analysis. Crack paths were controlled by the damage initiation and evolution laws as well as the tearing energy of the rubber.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Ouyang · 2006
2. Cohesive zone models: a critical review of traction-separation relationships across fracture surfaces10.1115/1.4023110 ↗
3. A bilinear cohesive zone model tailored for fracture of asphalt concrete considering viscoelastic bulk material10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.030 ↗
4. Cohesive traction–separation laws for tearing of ductile metal plates10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.02.009 ↗
5. Crack band theory for fracture of concrete
6. Cohesive zone modeling and calibration for mode I tearing of large ductile plates10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.03.015 ↗
7. Progressive damage modeling of plain weave E-glass/phenolic composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.037 ↗
8. Impact damage and residual strength predictions of 2D woven SiC/SiC composites10.1016/j.finel.2016.01.001 ↗
9. Rupture of rubber I. Characteristic energy for tearing10.1002/pol.1953.120100303 ↗
10. Fracture mechanics of rubber
11. Rupture of rubber. III. Determination of tear properties10.1002/pol.1955.120188803 ↗
12. Tear behavior of rubbers over a wide range of rates10.5254/1.3535791 ↗
13. The effect of rate of strain on tearing in rubber10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.11.014 ↗
14. Application of finite element based fracture mechanics analysis to cord-rubber structures10.2346/1.2137520 ↗
15. A finite element model for the rolling loss prediction and fracture analysis of radial tires10.2346/1.2135987 ↗
16. Cohesive element modeling of viscoelastic fracture: application to peel testing of polymers10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00339-4 ↗
18. Crack propagation in pneumatic tires10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.10.002 ↗
19. Numerical analysis of dynamic crack propagation in rubbers10.1007/s10704-012-9761-8 ↗
20. A cohesive zone model to predict dynamic tearing of rubber10.2346/tire.15.430403 ↗
21. Bekar · 2008
22. Large deformation isotropic elasticity10.1098/rspa.1972.0026 ↗
23. Internal rupture of bonded rubber cylinders in tension10.1098/rspa.1959.0016 ↗
24. Physics of rubber as related to the automobile10.1063/1.1710439 ↗
25. Fracture of elastomers by cavitation10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.058 ↗
26. Finite deformation viscoelasticity laws10.1016/S0167-6636(99)00045-9 ↗