journal article·2023-04Open access

Water Spider‐Inspired Nanofiber Coating with Sustainable Scale Repellency via Air‐Replenishing Strategy

Yixuan Wang, Ran Zhao, Xiao He, Zhe Zhang, Jingxin Meng, Shutao Wang

Advanced Materials· Volume 35· Issue 14

Abstract

Abstract To survive underwater even in severely hypoxic water for a long period, the water spider has to periodically collect and replenish air into the diving bell. Inspired by this natural air‐replenishing strategy, a water spider‐inspired nanofiber (WSN) coating with underwater superaerophilicity displaying excellent and sustainable scalephobic capability is prepared. Air film on the WSN coating can be well‐kept and further employed as the barrier layer for scale repellence. Significantly, scalephobic capability of the WSN coating mainly originates from two aspects: inhibiting interfacial nucleation and reducing interfacial adhesion of scale. Compared with previous studies, this WSN coating achieves excellent and sustainable scale repellence (≈ 98% reduction in scale deposition) even after a one‐month dynamic scaling test. Thus, this air‐replenishing strategy may raise a new avenue for advanced long‐term scalephobic materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CAS Key Laboratory of Bio‐inspired Materials and Interfacial Science Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 P. R. China

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) Beijing 100049 P. R. China

Binzhou Institute of Technology Binzhou 256600 P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41563-019-0440-210.1038/s41563-019-0440-2 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20170305310.1002/adma.201703053 ↗
3. 10.1039/D0CS00751J10.1039/D0CS00751J ↗
4. 10.1038/s41586-020-2331-810.1038/s41586-020-2331-8 ↗
5. 10.1039/D0CS01033B10.1039/D0CS01033B ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20220379210.1002/adma.202203792 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20150352010.1002/adma.201503520 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20150006410.1002/adma.201500064 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0007010.1021/acs.accounts.8b00070 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-022-31028-610.1038/s41467-022-31028-6 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.aba501010.1126/science.aba5010 ↗
12. 10.1021/nn406522n10.1021/nn406522n ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20190479610.1002/adfm.201904796 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0128210.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01282 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b0044410.1021/acs.iecr.5b00444 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13869310.1016/j.cej.2022.138693 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c0153310.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01533 ↗
18. 10.1186/2193-1801-2-69410.1186/2193-1801-2-694 ↗
19. 10.1242/jeb.07027610.1242/jeb.070276 ↗
20. 10.1242/jeb.05609310.1242/jeb.056093 ↗
21. 10.1021/la301299e10.1021/la301299e ↗
22. 10.1039/C6SM00302H10.1039/C6SM00302H ↗
23. 10.1039/C8PY01564C10.1039/C8PY01564C ↗
24. 10.1039/c1cc10900f10.1039/c1cc10900f ↗
25. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.03.00510.1016/j.plantsci.2007.03.005 ↗
26. 10.1039/c2jm34307j10.1039/c2jm34307j ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.16610410.1103/PhysRevLett.105.166104 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20170202010.1002/adfm.201702020 ↗
29. 10.1016/0009-2509(91)80035-W10.1016/0009-2509(91)80035-W ↗
30. 10.1063/1.174454010.1063/1.1744540 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.7b0556410.1021/acsami.7b05564 ↗
32. 10.1163/156856192X0062910.1163/156856192X00629 ↗
33. Wood M. J. · 2020 · 28
34. C.Miller K.Vasconcelos D.Little A.Bhasin Investigating Aspects of Aggreagte Properties That Influence Asphalt Mixture Performance‐Texas A&M University College Station and The University of Texas at Austin Austin 2011.
35. 10.1039/C6TA07262C10.1039/C6TA07262C ↗
36. 10.1126/science.aba501010.1126/science.aba5010 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0397510.1021/acs.iecr.7b03975 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.10556610.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105566 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12863210.1016/j.cej.2021.128632 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13396010.1016/j.cej.2021.133960 ↗
41. 10.1088/2053-1591/ac4aa410.1088/2053-1591/ac4aa4 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13527310.1016/j.cej.2022.135273 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.surfin.2022.10237910.1016/j.surfin.2022.102379 ↗
44. 10.3390/molecules2717562410.3390/molecules27175624 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.10709010.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.107090 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12646710.1016/j.cej.2020.126467 ↗
47. Zhu M. L. · Pet. Sci. · 2021 · 18 · 951
48. 10.1016/j.petsci.2022.07.00510.1016/j.petsci.2022.07.005 ↗
49. MacAdam J. · 2015 · 6
50. 10.1002/adma.20210823210.1002/adma.202108232 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0379110.1021/acsnano.5b03791 ↗