journal article·2014-10

Ductile failure analysis and crack behavior of X65 buried pipes using extended finite element method

Bojun Zhang, Cheng Ye, Bin Liang, Zhongzheng Zhang, Youran Zhi

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to study the ductile fracture mechanism of API X65 buried pipes including crack initiation and propagation using the extended finite element method (XFEM). First, the crack evolution histories of X65 specimens with initial crack-like flaws during tensile and three-point bending tests are illustrated, and the numerical results are compared with experimental data. In addition, effects of different crack configurations, damage initiation and evolution criteria are investigated. Second, the burst processes of straight pipes with initial gouge flaws are presented, and the FE results are compared with assessment in related standards and experiments. Finally, the crack onset and growth of buried pipes due to deflection arising from landslide movements are predicted, and the numerical results are compared with previous study. Particularly, the internal pressure, wall thickness, and soil properties on crack behavior and limit load-bearing ability are investigated. This paper provides a fundamental support for the integrity assessment and safety evaluation of buried pipes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Newmark NM, Hall WJ. Pipeline design to resist large fault displacement. In: Proceedings of U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering; 1975. p. 416–25.
2. A refined seismic analysis and design of buried pipeline for fault movement10.1002/eqe.4290130109 ↗
3. Fault movement effects on buried oil pipeline10.1061/TPEJAN.0000659 ↗
4. A semi-analytical approach to a nonlinear stress–strain analysis of buried steel pipelines crossing active faults10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.002 ↗
5. Elastoplastic stress–strain analysis of buried steel pipelines subjected to fault displacements with account for service loads10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.10.001 ↗
6. Failure analysis of natural gas buried X65 steel pipeline under deflection load using finite element method10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.045 ↗
7. Failure analysis and safety evaluation of buried pipeline due to deflection of landslide process10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.05.011 ↗
8. A finite element ductile failure simulation method using stress-modified fracture strain model10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.10.004 ↗
9. Comparison of fracture strain based ductile failure simulation with experimental results10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.07.006 ↗
10. Ductile failure analysis of API X65 pipes with notch-type defects using a local fracture criterion10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.03.002 ↗
11. A phenomenological model of ductile fracture for API X65 steel10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.03.008 ↗
12. Analysis of ductile rupture in notched bar10.1016/0022-5096(84)90031-0 ↗
13. Finite element analysis of plastic collapse and crack behavior of steel pressure vessels and piping using XFEM10.1007/s11668-012-9623-8 ↗
14. ABAQUS 6.11 documentation.
15. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
16. Bridgeman · 1952
17. BS EN 1594. Gas supply systems – pipelines for maximum operating pressure over 16bar – functional requirements. British Standards Policy and Strategy Committee; 2009.
18. ASME B31.8. Gas Transmission and distribution piping systems. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2010.