Impact of vertical and horizontal sliding joints on the behavior of RC infilled frames after column failure
Source abstract
Abstract
• Sliding joints increase the ductility by 900%–1230%. • Mortarless sliding joints decrease the resistance of the infilled frames. • The orientation of the sliding joints greatly influences the failure mode. • More sliding joints improve energy absorption and frame ductility. • Joint number and orientation significantly impact infill-frame interaction. The present paper investigates the global and local behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) frames under column failure scenarios. The research aims to serve as proof of concept by investigating the impact of vertical and horizontal sliding joints within infill masonry walls through a detailed experimental study. This topic has not been previously explored in the context of progressive collapse. The experimental study includes nine RC frame specimens with different configurations of infill walls made of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) to examine the effect of the number of sliding joints and their orientation on the behaviour followed by a column failure. The results show that the number of sliding joints and their orientation significantly affect the behaviour of the infilled frames and their failure mode. Moreover, it shows that implementing sliding joints may prevent an early frame failure because of its interaction with infill walls. Thus, they significantly increase the ductility of the composite system. These findings show that sliding joint application has a promising potential to increase the structure’s robustness in column failure scenarios.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Testing and analysis of steel and concrete beam-column assemblies under a column removal scenario10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000422 ↗
2. Experimental study of reinforced concrete assemblies under column removal scenario10.14359/51686739 ↗
3. Special detailing techniques to improve structural resistance against progressive collapse
4. Structural behavior of reinforced concrete frames subjected to progressive collapse10.14359/51689424 ↗
5. An experimental investigation of the progressive collapse resistance of beam-column RC sub-assemblages10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.179 ↗
6. Dynamic progressive collapse of an RC assemblage induced by contact detonation
7. Experimental and numerical investigation of dynamic progressive collapse of reinforced concrete beam-column assemblies under a middle-column removal scenario10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.050 ↗
8. Experimental investigation of progressive collapse resistance of one-way reinforced concrete beam-slab substructures under a middle-column-removal scenario10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.051 ↗
9. Experimental investigation of RC beam-slab substructures against progressive collapse subject to an edge-column-removal scenario10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.039 ↗
10. Dynamic performance of RC beam-column substructures under the scenario of the loss of a corner column-experimental results10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.016 ↗
11. Performance of three-dimensional reinforced concrete beam-column substructures under loss of a corner column scenario10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000630 ↗
12. Experimental study on progressive collapse-resistant behavior of reinforced concrete frame structures
13. Experimental study and numerical analysis of progressive collapse resistance of composite frames10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.006 ↗
14. S.L. Orton, M. Asce, J.E. Kirby, Dynamic Response of a RC Frame under Column Removal 2014. Doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943.10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000464 ↗
15. Dynamic performance of a real-scale reinforced concrete building test under a corner-column failure scenario
16. Assessment of progressive collapse potential of special moment resisting RC frames – Experimental and FE study10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.07.045 ↗
17. M. Huang, H. Huang, B. Wang, M. Zhao, M. Guo, Y. Ma, Progressive collapse analysis of RC structures with HPFL-BSP strengthened slabs, Eng. Fail. Anal. 163. Doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108479.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108479 ↗
18. X.J. Yang, F. Lin, X. Du, L. Qiu, Collapse-resistant mechanism of RC beam-slab substructures using kinked steel plates under two-adjacent-edge-columns removal scenario, Eng. Fail. Anal. 156. Doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107810.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107810 ↗
19. Structural defence
20. The design of framed buildings against high-explosive bombs. The civil engineer in war: A symposium of papers on war-time engineering problems
21. Robustness of multistory buildings with masonry infill
22. Infilled masonry walls contribution in mitigating progressive collapse of multistory reinforced concrete structures according to UFC guidelines10.1007/s40091-015-0094-5 ↗
23. Influence of unreinforced masonry infill panels on the robustness of multistory buildings10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000392 ↗
24. Behavior of reinforced concrete frame with masonry infill wall subjected to vertical load10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.001 ↗
25. Experimental and numerical study on progressive collapse process of RC frames with full-height infill walls10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.020 ↗
26. Resistance of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill walls to in-plane gravity loading due to loss of a supporting column10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.061 ↗
27. Robustness of RC building structures with infill masonry walls: Tests on a purpose-built structure
28. M. Sasani, S. Sagiroglu, Progressive Collapse Resistance of Hotel San Diego n.d. Doi: 10.1061/ASCE0733-94452008134:3478.
29. H. Wang, S. Li, C. Zhai, Evaluation on the failure modes and progressive collapse resistance of self-centering infilled precast concrete frame, Eng. Fail. Anal. 2024;159. Doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108044.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108044 ↗
30. D. Chang, B. Zeng, L.J. Huang, Z. Zhou, Investigation on progressive collapse resistance of prestressed concrete frames with infilled walls, Eng. Fail. Anal. 2023;143. Doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106866.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106866 ↗
31. M. Hohes, Steel frames with brickwork and concrete infilling, n.d.
32. B.S. Smith, B. Phd, C. Carter, A method of analysis for infilled frames, n.d.
33. Numerical modelling and validation of the response of masonry infilled rc frames using experimental testing results10.3390/buildings10100182 ↗
34. A micro–macro modelling methodology for the analysis of infilled frames10.1007/s10518-021-01045-9 ↗
35. Determination of the interaction between a masonry wall and a confining frame10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.001 ↗
36. Rocking cantilever clay brick infill wall panels: a novel low damage infill wall system10.1080/13632469.2016.1190797 ↗
37. An engineered infilled frame: Behavior and calibration10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.01.008 ↗
38. Innovative solution for seismic-resistant masonry infills with sliding joints: in-plane experimental performance10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.018 ↗
39. Experimental study on a steel frame infill wall based on vertical partitioning technology
40. Numerical investigation of the in-plane performance of masonry-infilled RC frames with sliding subpanels