journal article·2024-02Open access

Heterogenized Molecular Electrocatalyst Based on a Hydroxo‐Bridged Binuclear Copper(II) Phenanthroline Compound for Selective Reduction of CO2 to Ethylene

Na Liu, Stephan Bartling, Armin Springer, Christoph Kubis, Olga S. Bokareva, Evaristo Salaya, Jiameng Sun, Zhonghua Zhang, Sebastian Wohlrab, Ali M. Abdel‐Mageed, Hong‐Qing Liang, Robert Francke

Advanced Materials· Volume 36· Issue 6

Abstract

Molecular copper catalysts have emerged as promising candidates for the electrochemical reduction of CO2. Notable features of such systems include the ability of Cu to generate C2+ products and the well‐defined active sites that allow for targeted structural tuning. However, the frequently observed in situ formation of Cu nanoclusters has undermined the advantages of the molecular frameworks. It is therefore desirable to develop Cu‐based catalysts that retain their molecular structures during electrolysis. In this context, a heterogenized binuclear hydroxo‐bridged phenanthroline Cu(II) compound with a short Cu···Cu distance is reported as a simple yet efficient catalyst for electrogeneration of ethylene and other C2 products. In an aqueous electrolyte, the catalyst demonstrates remarkable performance, with excellent Faradaic efficiency for C2 products (62%) and minimal H2 evolution (8%). Furthermore, it exhibits high stability, manifested by no observable degradation during 15 h of continuous electrolysis. The preservation of the atomic distribution of the active sites throughout electrolysis is substantiated through comprehensive characterizations, including X‐ray photoelectron and absorption spectroscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, UV–vis spectroscopy, as well as control experiments. These findings establish a solid foundation for further investigations into targeted structural tuning, opening new avenues for enhancing the catalytic performance of Cu‐based molecular electrocatalysts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · Ionic liquids properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Leibniz Institute for Catalysis Albert‐Einstein‐Str. 29a 18059 Rostock Germany

Electron Microscopy Center University Medicine Rostock Strempelstr. 14 18057 Rostock Germany<?vsp -1pc?>

Institute of Physics University of Kassel Heinrich‐Plett‐Str. 40 34132 Kassel Germany

Key Laboratory for Liquid–Solid Structural Evolution and Processing of Materials (Ministry of Education) School of Materials Science and Engineering Shandong University Jingshi Rd. 17923 Jinan 250061 P. R. China

Department of Polymer Science and Engineering Zhejiang University Yuhangtang Rd. 866 Hangzhou 310058 P. R. China

Institute of Chemistry Rostock University Albert‐Einstein‐Str. 3a 18059 Rostock Germany<?vsp 2pc?>

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (83)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/ep.1304110.1002/ep.13041 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr400275810.1021/cr4002758 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20180716610.1002/adma.201807166 ↗
4. 10.1021/jacs.9b0212410.1021/jacs.9b02124 ↗
5. 10.2533/chimia.2015.76910.2533/chimia.2015.769 ↗
6. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0140510.1021/acscatal.9b01405 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20170361410.1002/aenm.201703614 ↗
8. 10.1039/D3QM00364G10.1039/D3QM00364G ↗
9. 10.1021/cr500243610.1021/cr5002436 ↗
10. 10.1142/p70210.1142/p702 ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.2c1035110.1021/jacs.2c10351 ↗
12. 10.1039/D0QM01127D10.1039/D0QM01127D ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20210215110.1002/adfm.202102151 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0474610.1021/acscatal.9b04746 ↗
15. 10.1002/smll.20210745010.1002/smll.202107450 ↗
16. 10.1246/cl.1985.169510.1246/cl.1985.1695 ↗
17. 10.1246/cl.1986.89710.1246/cl.1986.897 ↗
18. 10.1039/c3988000001710.1039/c39880000017 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-022-29428-910.1038/s41467-022-29428-9 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41929-019-0235-510.1038/s41929-019-0235-5 ↗
21. 10.1002/advs.20210159710.1002/advs.202101597 ↗
22. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0077010.1021/acscatal.6b00770 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0045910.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00459 ↗
24. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0218110.1021/acscatal.6b02181 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.07.00110.1016/j.coelec.2020.07.001 ↗
26. 10.1039/D0CS00218F10.1039/D0CS00218F ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20220639910.1002/anie.202206399 ↗
28. 10.1039/C6CY02352E10.1039/C6CY02352E ↗
29. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0354810.1021/acscatal.8b03548 ↗
30. 10.1126/science.122458110.1126/science.1224581 ↗
31. 10.1021/ja501252f10.1021/ja501252f ↗
32. 10.1002/anie.20170110410.1002/anie.201701104 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.organomet.8b0051710.1021/acs.organomet.8b00517 ↗
34. 10.1002/aenm.20220210810.1002/aenm.202202108 ↗
35. 10.1002/anie.20200744510.1002/anie.202007445 ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.5b0391310.1021/jacs.5b03913 ↗
37. 10.1039/C5CC09041E10.1039/C5CC09041E ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.6b1147410.1021/jacs.6b11474 ↗
39. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0252510.1021/acscatal.8b02525 ↗
40. 10.1039/D0CC07659G10.1039/D0CC07659G ↗
41. 10.1038/s41586-019-1760-810.1038/s41586-019-1760-8 ↗
42. 10.1002/anie.20190925710.1002/anie.201909257 ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20220072310.1002/anie.202200723 ↗
44. 10.1126/science.117798110.1126/science.1177981 ↗
45. 10.1021/jacs.6b0474610.1021/jacs.6b04746 ↗
46. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0222010.1021/acscatal.7b02220 ↗
47. 10.1021/acscatal.3c0143910.1021/acscatal.3c01439 ↗
48. 10.1039/D2CC06943A10.1039/D2CC06943A ↗
49. 10.1002/cctc.20230039610.1002/cctc.202300396 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41467-018-02819-710.1038/s41467-018-02819-7 ↗
51. 10.1039/cs994230032710.1039/cs9942300327 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.04.00810.1016/j.ccr.2010.04.008 ↗
53. 10.1002/hlca.1963046065710.1002/hlca.19630460657 ↗
54. 10.1002/hlca.1963046074010.1002/hlca.19630460740 ↗
55. 10.34133/research.000810.34133/research.0008 ↗
56. 10.1002/aenm.20180315110.1002/aenm.201803151 ↗
57. b)Two additional studies on eCO2RR using Cu complexes with phen or phenanthroline‐derived ligands have appeared focusing on six mononuclear complexes bearing differently substituted phen ligands employed in aqueous solution (ref. [16a]). Even though in some cases the generation of C2H4was observed in high FE formation of nanoparticles on the cathode occurred during electrolysis which explains the good selectivity for C2+products. Another study by Mozer and co‐workers deals with the use of a 2 9‐dimethyl‐1 10‐phenanthroline copper complex in dimethylformamide which mainly leads to production of CH4(up to 80% FE see ref. [16b]). Characterization of deposits on the cathode indicated formation of Cu nanoparticles along with Cu–polymer composites.
58. 10.1016/S0162-0134(03)00049-710.1016/S0162-0134(03)00049-7 ↗
59. 10.1021/jacs.7b0676510.1021/jacs.7b06765 ↗
60. 10.1021/jacs.6b0761210.1021/jacs.6b07612 ↗
61. 10.1002/sia.623910.1002/sia.6239 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0713810.1021/acsnano.2c07138 ↗
63. 10.1002/anie.20211170010.1002/anie.202111700 ↗
64. 10.1002/anie.20230192010.1002/anie.202301920 ↗
65. 10.1246/bcsj.59.228510.1246/bcsj.59.2285 ↗
66. An obvious explanation for the lower intensity of the UV absorption is catalyst leaching. To investigate this possibility ICP‐OES analysis of the catholyte solution was carried out after a typical CPE experiment (−1.25 V 30 min). The Cu concentration was estimated as 2.5 mg L−1(total amount in catholyte: 42 µg) which means that ≈1/5 of the initial Cu loading was present in solution. Consequently the decrease of the Cu content in the electrode coating alone cannot explain the reduction of the intensity of the bands. A second possible explanation is the morphology change of the electrode coating during electrolysis i.e. formation of the amorphous porous composite (see Figure 3a b) that leads to an inferior exposition of the catalyst for spectroscopic detection.
67. 10.1039/C8SC05056B10.1039/C8SC05056B ↗
68. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0143910.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01439 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.07.01310.1016/j.chempr.2019.07.013 ↗
70. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0436810.1021/acscatal.9b04368 ↗
71. 10.1021/jacs.9b0463810.1021/jacs.9b04638 ↗
72. 10.1063/1.35923410.1063/1.359234 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.saa.2019.11737910.1016/j.saa.2019.117379 ↗
74. 10.1021/jacs.0c0169910.1021/jacs.0c01699 ↗
75. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3749(200004)626:4<816::AID-ZAAC816>3.0.CO;2-V10.1002/(SICI)1521-3749(200004)626:4<816::AID-ZAAC816>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
76. 10.1039/C1CP22700A10.1039/C1CP22700A ↗
77. 10.1002/anie.20160158210.1002/anie.201601582 ↗
78. 10.1126/science.aas910010.1126/science.aas9100 ↗
79. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0102210.1021/acscatal.8b01022 ↗
80. 10.1107/S090904950501271910.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
81. 10.1007/978-3-031-07125-6_2710.1007/978-3-031-07125-6_27 ↗
82. 10.1023/A:101910531022110.1023/A:1019105310221 ↗
83. 10.1021/jacs.7b1046210.1021/jacs.7b10462 ↗