Spatiotemporal Data Processing with Memristor Crossbar‐Array‐Based Graph Reservoir
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Memristor‐based physical reservoir computing (RC) is a robust framework for processing complex spatiotemporal data parallelly. However, conventional memristor‐based reservoirs cannot capture the spatial relationship between the time‐varying inputs due to the specific mapping scheme assigning one input signal to one memristor conductance. Here, a physical “graph reservoir” is introduced using a metal cell at the diagonal‐crossbar array (mCBA) with dynamic self‐rectifying memristors. Input and inverted input signals are applied to the word and bit lines of the mCBA, respectively, storing the correlation information between input signals in the memristors. In this way, the mCBA graph reservoirs can map the spatiotemporal correlation of the input data in a high‐dimensional feature space. The high‐dimensional mapping characteristics of the graph reservoir achieve notable results, including a normalized root‐mean‐square error of 0.09 in Mackey–Glass time series prediction, a 97.21% accuracy in MNIST recognition, and an 80.0% diagnostic accuracy in human connectome classification.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Neural dynamics and brain function
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Inter‐university Semiconductor Research Center, College of Engineering Seoul National University Seoul 08826 Republic of Korea
Mechatronics Research Center Samsung Electronics, Banwal‐dong Hwasung‐si Gyeonggi‐do 18448 Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. H.Jaeger Bonn Germany: German National Research Center for Information Technology GMD Technical Report2001 148 13.
2. Natschläger T. · Spec. Issue Found. Inf. Process. Telemat. · 2002 · 8 · 39
3. 10.1016/j.neunet.2007.04.00310.1016/j.neunet.2007.04.003 ↗
4. 10.1109/TNNLS.2012.218841410.1109/TNNLS.2012.2188414 ↗
5. 10.1109/JBHI.2014.233200110.1109/JBHI.2014.2332001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.artmed.2018.02.00210.1016/j.artmed.2018.02.002 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cosrev.2009.03.00510.1016/j.cosrev.2009.03.005 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-017-02337-y10.1038/s41467-017-02337-y ↗
9. 10.1038/s41928-019-0313-310.1038/s41928-019-0313-3 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-020-20692-110.1038/s41467-020-20692-1 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41928-022-00838-310.1038/s41928-022-00838-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.03.00510.1016/j.neunet.2019.03.005 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41563-021-01099-910.1038/s41563-021-01099-9 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20220950310.1002/adma.202209503 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20140006410.1002/adfm.201400064 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20150116710.1002/adma.201501167 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20170432010.1002/adma.201704320 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.194010.1103/PhysRevB.39.1940 ↗
19. 10.1109/LED.2009.201658510.1109/LED.2009.2016585 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.26732610.1126/science.267326 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.109127710.1126/science.1091277 ↗
22. Antonik P. · ArXiv:1802.02026 · 2018
23. 10.1038/s41467-022-29260-110.1038/s41467-022-29260-1 ↗
24. Y.Lecun CCortes AT&T Labs [Online]. Available at:http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist2010.
25. 10.1038/s41467-021-25925-510.1038/s41467-021-25925-5 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41928-022-00876-x10.1038/s41928-022-00876-x ↗
27. 10.1063/5.013764710.1063/5.0137647 ↗
28. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.001004210.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042 ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05888.x10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05888.x ↗
30. 10.1038/nmeth.245110.1038/nmeth.2451 ↗
31. 10.1038/nrn390110.1038/nrn3901 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.02.01810.1016/j.biopsych.2014.02.018 ↗
33. 10.1212/WNL.000000000000154810.1212/WNL.0000000000001548 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.02310.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.023 ↗
35. N. C.Dvornek P.Ventola K. A.Pelphrey J. S.Duncan Proc. Machine Learning in Medical Imaging: 8th International Workshop 2017 pp.362 370.10.1007/978-3-319-67389-9_42 ↗
36. N. C.Dvornek D.Yang P.Ventola J. S.Duncan Proc.International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer‐Assisted Intervention 2018 pp.329 337.10.1007/978-3-030-00931-1_38 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.04510.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.045 ↗
38. S.Zhou W.Li C. R.Cox H.Lu Proc.S.AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence New York USA 2020 pp.6957‐6964.10.1609/aaai.v34i04.6179 ↗
39. 10.1006/nimg.2001.097810.1006/nimg.2001.0978 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.media.2021.10197210.1016/j.media.2021.101972 ↗