Size‐Controllable High‐Entropy Alloys Toward Stable Hydrogen Production at Industrial‐Scale Current Densities
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Efficient and stable electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) at high current densities is highly desirable for industrial‐scale hydrogen production, which is yet challenging, because of the electrocatalyst with short lifespans during the acidic HER process. Here, a controllable preparation technique is successfully developed to synthesize PdPtRuRhAu high‐entropy alloys (HEAs) of various sizes, within the 3.14 nm particles (HEA‐3.14) demonstrating exceptional catalytic performance and stable hydrogen production at current densities of −500 and −1000 mA·cm−2 with negligible activity loss over 100 h. Theoretical calculations indicate that the bridge adsorption site of Pd–Au serves as an ideal location for HER, with HEA‐3.14 possessing the highest proportion of such sites, reaching 18.97%. To further analyze the thermodynamic stability of HEAs, an element‐encoding machine learning model is developed from over 300 000 preprocessed dataset of HEAs that achieving an impressively low RMSE of 58.6 °C and a high R2 value of 0.98. By integrating thermodynamic modeling with machine learning methods, the melting point of the PdPtRuRhAu HEAs at 3.14 nm (366 °C) is predicted, which aligns well with the results obtained from differential scanning calorimetry tests. This work offers new insights and approaches for designing HEAs that reliably produce hydrogen at high current densities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Featured Metal Materials and Life‐cycle Safety for Composite Structures and School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Guangxi University Nanning 530004 China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resource Processing and Process Intensification Technology Guangxi University Nanning 530004 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0200310.1021/acsanm.2c02003 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12147210.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121472 ↗
3. 10.1002/inf2.1235710.1002/inf2.12357 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20150269610.1002/adma.201502696 ↗
5. 10.1039/C3EE42441C10.1039/C3EE42441C ↗
6. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0282010.1021/acsnano.2c02820 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.12251810.1016/j.molliq.2023.122518 ↗
8. 10.1126/sciadv.add697810.1126/sciadv.add6978 ↗
9. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz394410.1126/sciadv.aaz3944 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0538310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b05383 ↗
11. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0678210.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06782 ↗
12. 10.1039/C8EE01270A10.1039/C8EE01270A ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ces.2021.11651310.1016/j.ces.2021.116513 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20210353310.1002/adma.202103533 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20180133210.1002/adfm.201801332 ↗
16. 10.1039/C8TA02999G10.1039/C8TA02999G ↗
17. 10.1039/C7TA08090E10.1039/C7TA08090E ↗
18. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00271-810.1016/S1359-6454(00)00271-8 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23259610.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232596 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41578-019-0121-410.1038/s41578-019-0121-4 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.abo494010.1126/science.abo4940 ↗
22. 10.1002/admi.20230102010.1002/admi.202301020 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.07.08010.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.07.080 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-020-19277-910.1038/s41467-020-19277-9 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.dib.2023.10936210.1016/j.dib.2023.109362 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20200038510.1002/adma.202000385 ↗
27. 10.1021/jacs.1c1374010.1021/jacs.1c13740 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20180899410.1002/adfm.201808994 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10723110.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107231 ↗
30. 10.1039/D3EE01929B10.1039/D3EE01929B ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20160860110.1002/anie.201608601 ↗
32. 10.1039/c3nr03219a10.1039/c3nr03219a ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.3c0112810.1021/acsami.3c01128 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20230009110.1002/adma.202300091 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13325110.1016/j.cej.2021.133251 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jssc.2022.12338810.1016/j.jssc.2022.123388 ↗
37. 10.1002/advs.20230009410.1002/advs.202300094 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.scib.2022.08.02210.1016/j.scib.2022.08.022 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41467-022-30379-410.1038/s41467-022-30379-4 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15890910.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158909 ↗
41. 10.1016/S1748-0132(07)70113-510.1016/S1748-0132(07)70113-5 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14367210.1016/j.cej.2023.143672 ↗
43. 10.1021/jp056953710.1021/jp0569537 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-023-44261-410.1038/s41467-023-44261-4 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsami.4c1735410.1021/acsami.4c17354 ↗
46. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0197510.1021/acscatal.7b01975 ↗
47. 10.1021/ar300242710.1021/ar3002427 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16183910.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161839 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.18210.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.182 ↗
50. 10.1109/ICDM.2008.1710.1109/ICDM.2008.17 ↗
51. 10.1007/978-3-319-43742-2_1510.1007/978-3-319-43742-2_15 ↗
52. Exploratory Data Analysis in The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics Springer New York New York NY 2008 pp.192–194.
53. Mahesh B. · Int. J. Sci. Res. · 2020 · 9 · 381
54. 10.1007/s11277-017-5224-x10.1007/s11277-017-5224-x ↗
55. 10.1039/D0SC02351E10.1039/D0SC02351E ↗
56. 10.1039/D0NR07632E10.1039/D0NR07632E ↗
57. 10.1002/aenm.20180226910.1002/aenm.201802269 ↗
58. 10.1002/admi.20190001510.1002/admi.201900015 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.07.02910.1016/j.matt.2020.07.029 ↗
60. 10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00470-610.1016/S0009-2614(03)00470-6 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.02110.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.021 ↗
62. 10.1039/D2EE03185J10.1039/D2EE03185J ↗
63. 10.1002/adma.20170387010.1002/adma.201703870 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.880010.1103/PhysRevB.33.8800 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.35310.1103/PhysRevLett.65.353 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.11400010.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114000 ↗
68. P. I.Frazier inRecent Advances in Optimization and Modeling of Contemporary Problems 2018.10.1287/educ.2018.0188 ↗
69. Liashchynskyi P. · Arxiv · 2019 · 11