Stone–Wales Defects Cause High Proton Permeability and Isotope Selectivity of Single‐Layer Graphene
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract While the isotope‐dependent hydrogen permeability of graphene membranes at ambient condition has been demonstrated, the underlying mechanism has been controversially discussed during the past 5 years. The reported room‐temperature proton‐over‐deuteron (H+‐over‐D+) selectivity is 10, much higher than in any competing method. Yet, it has not been understood how protons can penetrate through graphene membranes—proposed hypotheses include atomic defects and local hydrogenation. However, neither can explain both the high permeability and high selectivity of the atomically thin membranes. Here, it is confirmed that ideal graphene is quasi‐impermeable to protons, yet the most common defect in sp2 carbons, the topological Stone–Wales defect, has a calculated penetration barrier below 1 eV and H+‐over‐D+ selectivity of 7 at room temperature and, thus, explains all experimental results on graphene membranes that are available to date. The competing explanation, local hydrogenation, which also reduces the penetration barrier, but shows significantly lower isotope selectivity, is challenged.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Advancements in Battery Materials · Muon and positron interactions and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Helmholtz‐Zentrum Dresden‐Rossendorf, Abteilung Ressourcenökologie Forschungsstelle Leipzig Permoserstr. 15 Leipzig 04318 Germany
Wilhelm‐Ostwald‐Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie Universität Leipzig Linnéstr. 2 Leipzig 04103 Germany
Theoretical Chemistry TU Dresden Mommsenstr. 13 Dresden 01062 Germany
Department of Chemistry Yonsei University 50 Yonsei‐ro Seodaemun‐gu Seoul 03722 Korea
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.75.1.29810.1073/pnas.75.1.298 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature1017310.1038/nature10173 ↗
3. 10.1038/458269a10.1038/458269a ↗
4. 10.1525/978052033840110.1525/9780520338401 ↗
5. 10.1021/bk-1978-006810.1021/bk-1978-0068 ↗
6. 10.1038/nature1401510.1038/nature14015 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.aac972610.1126/science.aac9726 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0815210.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08152 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0150710.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01507 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms753910.1038/ncomms7539 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0282010.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02820 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.08610.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.086 ↗
13. 10.1021/jacs.7b1085310.1021/jacs.7b10853 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.493633510.1063/1.4936335 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-019-12314-210.1038/s41467-019-12314-2 ↗
16. 10.1021/nn102598m10.1021/nn102598m ↗
17. 10.1021/nl801386m10.1021/nl801386m ↗
18. 10.1021/jp501930a10.1021/jp501930a ↗
19. 10.1039/c3cp52318g10.1039/c3cp52318g ↗
20. 10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/02500410.1088/2053-1583/3/2/025004 ↗
21. 10.1039/C6CP08923B10.1039/C6CP08923B ↗
22. 10.1063/1.502431710.1063/1.5024317 ↗
23. 10.1038/ncomms1521510.1038/ncomms15215 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-1-4614-7116-510.1007/978-1-4614-7116-5 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0249610.1021/acsnano.0c02496 ↗
26. 10.1038/nnano.2013.4610.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
27. 10.1021/nl201432g10.1021/nl201432g ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.05710.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.057 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.03340710.1103/PhysRevB.80.033407 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.47852210.1063/1.478522 ↗
32. 10.1002/jcc.2175910.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
33. Frisch M. J. · 2009
34. 10.1002/wcms.132710.1002/wcms.1327 ↗