journal article·2022-05-02

Lotus-Like Water Repellency of Gas-Phase-Synthesized Graphene

M. Weston Miller, Makenna Parkinson, Albert Dato

ACS Materials Letters· Volume 4· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

The ability of lotus leaves to repel water is desired in numerous applications, such as self-cleaning surfaces, biomedical devices, and naval vessels. Creating materials that mimic the hierarchical structure and surface chemistry of lotus leaves requires multistep processes that are impractical for the mass production of nonwettable products. Superhydrophobic surfaces have been created using graphene. However, graphene sheets obtained through graphite exfoliation or deposition on substrates are not superhydrophobic and require additional processes to achieve lotus-like water repellency. In this work, we show that graphene produced in the gas phase is inherently superhydrophobic. Gas-phase-synthesized graphene (GSG) and lotus leaves have fundamentally different structures, yet water droplets on both materials exhibit comparable contact angles, roll-off angles, and bouncing characteristics. Furthermore, hydrophilic surfaces become superhydrophobic when covered with GSG. The substrate-free synthesis of GSG is straightforward and sustainable, which could enable the manufacturing of a diverse range of water-repellent technologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Graphene research and applications · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering, Harvey Mudd College, 301 Platt Boulevard, Claremont, California 91711, United States

Funding

Harvey Mudd College · Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/0892701060056232810.1080/08927010600562328 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20080065110.1002/adma.200800651 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.003 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep0173310.1038/srep01733 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.5b0187010.1021/acsami.5b01870 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41586-020-2331-810.1038/s41586-020-2331-8 ↗
7. 10.1039/C5NR00719D10.1039/C5NR00719D ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.121867311010.1073/pnas.1218673110 ↗
9. 10.1021/la800350410.1021/la8003504 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.00310.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20130280410.1002/adma.201302804 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat354210.1038/nmat3542 ↗
14. 10.1143/JJAP.51.01AJ0710.1143/JJAP.51.01AJ07 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0136310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01363 ↗
16. 10.1021/am501649w10.1021/am501649w ↗
17. 10.1039/C9RA10373B10.1039/C9RA10373B ↗
18. 10.1021/nl801156610.1021/nl8011566 ↗
19. 10.1557/jmr.2018.47010.1557/jmr.2018.470 ↗
20. 10.1039/b911395a10.1039/b911395a ↗
21. 10.1021/nl901664k10.1021/nl901664k ↗
22. 10.1002/ppap.20190024410.1002/ppap.201900244 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cartre.2020.10001010.1016/j.cartre.2020.100010 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.00210.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.002 ↗
25. 10.1039/C6RA26275A10.1039/C6RA26275A ↗
26. 10.1021/la304645w10.1021/la304645w ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.17610110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.176101 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20090369610.1002/adma.200903696 ↗
29. 10.1021/nl403709210.1021/nl4037092 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cis.2009.11.00110.1016/j.cis.2009.11.001 ↗