Unveiling Gating Behavior in Piezoionic Effect: toward Neuromimetic Tactile Sensing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The human perception system's information processing is intricately linked to the nonlinear response and gating effect of neurons. While piezoionics holds potential in emulating the pressure sensing capability of biological skin, the incorporation of information processing functions seems neglected. Here, ionic gating behavior in piezoionic hydrogels is uncovered as a notable extension beyond the previously observed linear responses. The hydrogel can generate remarkably high voltages (700 mV) and currents (7 mA) when indentation forces surpass the threshold. Through a comprehensive analysis involving simulations and experimental investigations, it is proposed that the gating behavior emerges due to significant diffusion differences between cations and anions. To showcase the practical implications of this breakthrough, the piezoionic hydrogels are successfully integrated with prostheses and robot hands, demonstrating that the gating effect enables accurate discrimination between gentle and harsh touch. The advancement in neuromimetic tactile sensing has significant potential for emerging applications such as humanoid robotics and biomedical engineering, offering valuable opportunities for further development of embodied neuromorphic intelligence.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Tactile and Sensory Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Information Science and Engineering Northeastern University Shenyang Liaoning 110819 China
School of Integrated Circuits and Electronics Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing 100081 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province · National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Lee Y. · Nat Biomed Eng · 2022 · 7 · 1
2. 10.1038/s41467-022-28487-210.1038/s41467-022-28487-2 ↗
3. 10.1002/aisy.20220008910.1002/aisy.202200089 ↗
4. 10.1002/celc.20230026810.1002/celc.202300268 ↗
5. 10.1002/smll.20160055310.1002/smll.201600553 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.01710.1016/j.cell.2022.06.017 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20210064910.1002/adfm.202100649 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.00610.1016/j.matt.2022.06.006 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41551-018-0335-610.1038/s41551-018-0335-6 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmps.2022.10501410.1016/j.jmps.2022.105014 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.01.00410.1016/j.jmps.2019.01.004 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20230787510.1002/adma.202307875 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20230070110.1002/adfm.202300701 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0101110.1021/acsmacrolett.8b01011 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aaw197410.1126/science.aaw1974 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20231312710.1002/adma.202313127 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20221048510.1002/adfm.202210485 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.1c1150510.1021/acsnano.1c11505 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-022-34285-710.1038/s41467-022-34285-7 ↗
20. 10.1126/sciadv.add695010.1126/sciadv.add6950 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2022.10074410.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100744 ↗
22. 10.1073/pnas.221144212010.1073/pnas.2211442120 ↗
23. 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.02500310.1103/RevModPhys.94.025003 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-023-35893-710.1038/s41467-023-35893-7 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.aao009810.1126/science.aao0098 ↗
26. 10.1039/C8SM00939B10.1039/C8SM00939B ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20170032910.1002/adfm.201700329 ↗
28. 10.1126/sciadv.abi723310.1126/sciadv.abi7233 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0266210.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02662 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cis.2009.10.00110.1016/j.cis.2009.10.001 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41467-019-08930-710.1038/s41467-019-08930-7 ↗
32. 10.1038/ncomms130810.1038/ncomms1308 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00047-110.1016/S0032-3861(00)00047-1 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.02150310.1103/PhysRevE.75.021503 ↗