Mechanochemical Adhesion and Plasticity in Multifiber Hydrogel Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The extracellular matrix (ECM) has force‐responsive (i.e., mechanochemical) properties that enable adaptation to mechanical loading through changes in fibrous network structure and interfiber bonding. Imparting such properties into synthetic fibrous materials will allow reinforcement under mechanical load, the potential for material self‐adhesion, and the general mimicking of ECM. Multifiber hydrogel networks are developed through the electrospinning of multiple fibrous hydrogel populations, where fibers contain complementary chemical moieties (e.g., aldehyde and hydrazide groups) that form covalent bonds within minutes when brought into contact under mechanical load. These fiber interactions lead to microscale anisotropy, as well as increased material stiffness and plastic deformation. Macroscale structures (e.g., tubes and layered scaffolds) are fabricated from these materials through interfiber bonding and adhesion when placed into contact while maintaining a microscale fibrous architecture. The design principles for engineering plasticity described can be applied to numerous material systems to introduce unique properties, from textiles to biomedical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Bioengineering University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19104 USA
Center for Engineering Mechanobiology and Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19104 USA
AO Research Institute Davos 7270 Davos Switzerland
Funding
National Institutes of Health · National Science Foundation · Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s42254-019-0036-410.1038/s42254-019-0036-4 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0352110.1038/nature03521 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.06.03410.1016/j.bpj.2016.06.034 ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.152390611310.1073/pnas.1523906113 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20070011610.1002/adfm.200700116 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.373910.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.3739 ↗
7. 10.1039/C7SM01393K10.1039/C7SM01393K ↗
8. 10.1038/nature1183910.1038/nature11839 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20170404610.1002/anie.201704046 ↗
10. 10.1038/nchem.172010.1038/nchem.1720 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.aau953310.1126/science.aau9533 ↗
12. 10.1039/C7SM01888F10.1039/C7SM01888F ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.06810.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.068 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20140499310.1002/adma.201404993 ↗
15. 10.1038/ncomms763910.1038/ncomms7639 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-017-01955-w10.1038/s41467-017-01955-w ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.004 ↗
18. 10.1038/nmat444410.1038/nmat4444 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.00810.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.008 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.08910.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.089 ↗
21. 10.1002/jbm.a.3632310.1002/jbm.a.36323 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20130368010.1002/adma.201303680 ↗
23. 10.1038/nmat392210.1038/nmat3922 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20170521510.1002/adma.201705215 ↗
25. 10.1098/rsfs.2015.008810.1098/rsfs.2015.0088 ↗
26. 10.1114/1.152704710.1114/1.1527047 ↗
27. 10.1039/C6IB00030D10.1039/C6IB00030D ↗
28. Mitchell G. R. · 2013 · 117
29. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.02910.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.029 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.400420510.1115/1.4004205 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.003 ↗
32. 10.1161/01.CIR.97.17.174610.1161/01.CIR.97.17.1746 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.04310.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.043 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.00510.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.005 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.02.00910.1016/j.stem.2018.02.009 ↗
36. 10.1089/ten.tea.2015.015010.1089/ten.tea.2015.0150 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0127610.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01276 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41551-019-0458-410.1038/s41551-019-0458-4 ↗