journal article·2014-05Open access

The Compromises of Printing Organic Electronics: A Case Study of Gravure‐Printed Light‐Emitting Electrochemical Cells

Gerardo Hernandez‐Sosa, Serpil Tekoglu, Sebastian Stolz, Ralph Eckstein, Claudia Teusch, Jannik Trapp, Uli Lemmer, Manuel Hamburger, Norman Mechau

Advanced Materials· Volume 26· Issue 20

Abstract

Light-emitting electrochemical cells (LECs) are fabricated by gravure printing. The compromise between device performance and printing quality is correlated to the ink formulation and the printing process. It is shown that the rheological properties of the ink formulations of LECs can be tailored without changing the chemical composition of the material blend. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Light Technology Institute Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Engesserstr. 13 76131 Karlsruhe Germany

InnovationLab, Speyererstr., 4 69115 Heidelberg Germany

Organisch‐Chemisches Institut Ruprecht‐Karls‐Universität Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 270 69120 Heidelberg Germany

Institute of Microstructure Technology Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Hermann‐von‐Helmholtz‐Platz 1 76344 Eggenstein‐Leopoldshafen Germany

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c3ee40388b10.1039/c3ee40388b ↗
2. 10.1039/b926348a10.1039/b926348a ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20120536110.1002/adma.201205361 ↗
4. 10.1039/c3cs60127g10.1039/c3cs60127g ↗
5. 10.1557/JMR.2004.027510.1557/JMR.2004.0275 ↗
6. 10.1002/polb.2319210.1002/polb.23192 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-3-540-29900-410.1007/978-3-540-29900-4 ↗
8. 10.1002/pi.197410.1002/pi.1974 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.269.5227.108610.1126/science.269.5227.1086 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms200210.1038/ncomms2002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.05210.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.052 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja953695q10.1021/ja953695q ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20120268910.1002/adfm.201202689 ↗
14. 10.1021/ja104555510.1021/ja1045555 ↗
15. 10.1021/jz101079710.1021/jz1010797 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20110404710.1002/adma.201104047 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.06810.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.068 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.orgel.2008.05.01010.1016/j.orgel.2008.05.010 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.329901810.1063/1.3299018 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja711329410.1021/ja7113294 ↗
21. 10.1021/cm903549u10.1021/cm903549u ↗
22. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.05.04010.1016/j.orgel.2013.05.040 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20100236010.1002/adfm.201002360 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20130028410.1002/aenm.201300284 ↗
25. 10.1039/c3tc00808h10.1039/c3tc00808h ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20120092410.1002/adma.201200924 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.09.02710.1016/j.orgel.2013.09.027 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.12.02010.1016/j.solmat.2010.12.020 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.149810.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1498 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.01.00410.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.01.004 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20120286210.1002/adfm.201202862 ↗
32. 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2011.55.4.04020110.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2011.55.4.040201 ↗
33. Bornemann N. · 2010 · 138
34. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2012.03.01110.1016/j.jnnfm.2012.03.011 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2010.09.00410.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2010.09.004 ↗