journal article·2026-06-19Open access

Fluorescence Behavior of Water‐Soluble Porphyrins Immobilized on LTA Zeolite and Its Chlorogenic Acid Polyphenol Sensing in Coffee Wastewater

João Otávio Donizette Malafatti, Gabriele Magna, Francesco Pizzoli, Fabrizio Caroleo, Cadia D'Ottavi, Williane da Silva Freitas, Ailton José Moreira, Elaine Cristina Paris, Luiz Henrique Capparelli Mattoso, Corrado Di Natale, Roberto Paolesse

Abstract

Chlorogenic acid (CGA) is one of the most common polyphenols found in many fruits, such as coffee cherries, and is among the most economical commodities worldwide. In coffee production, processing and washing require large amounts of water, making wastewater monitoring essential to prevent environmental impact. This work reports the development of a fluorescence‐based hybrid sensor designed for the detection of CGA using water‐soluble porphyrins immobilized on hierarchical LTA zeolite. The system is based on 5,10,15,20‐tetrakis(N‐methyl‐4‐pyridyl)porphyrin (TMPyP) and its Zn(II)‐metallated derivative (ZnTMPyP), synthesized directly on the zeolite surface via ion‐exchange processes. The hybrid materials (LTA/TMPyP and Zn‐LTA/TMPyP) were fully characterized, confirming the preservation of the zeolite structure and the formation of the metalloporphyrin complex within the intercrystalline void network. Fluorescence measurements in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) showed that Zn‐LTA/TMPyP exhibited the best performance for CGA detection, with a detection limit (LOD) of 0.22 nM. To mitigate potential interference from caffeine and caffeic acid, a novel sensing protocol was implemented using these compounds as a controlled background, maintaining high sensitivity (LOD = 0.64 nmol L ‐1 ). When tested in real coffee washing water, the sensor quantified CGA at 2.5 ± 0.7 nmol L ‐1 . The measurement accuracy was validated using a nonlinear standard addition method, yielding a recovery of 96.4%, confirming the sensor's ability to compensate for complex matrix effects. The results show that the Zn‐LTA/TMPyP hybrid material is a highly efficient, stable, and selective platform for CGA monitoring, with strong potential for integration into portable devices for environmental and agro‐industrial applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Coffee research and impacts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Nanotechnology Laboratory for Agriculture (LNNA) Embrapa Instrumentação São Carlos 13561‐206 Brazil

Department of Chemical Science and Technologies Tor Vergata University of Rome 00133 Rome Italy

Institute of Chemistry, São Paulo State University 14800‐900 Araraquara Brazil

Department of Electronic Engineering Tor Vergata University of Rome 00133 Rome Italy

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research (CIDR), SRM University‐AP Amaravati Andhra Pradesh 522502 India

Funding

Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura · Centros de Pesquisa, Inovação e Difusão, Fundação Amazônia Paraense de Amparo à Pesquisa

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Stefanello N. · Food Chem. Toxicol. · 2019 · 123 · 29810.1016/j.fct.2018.10.005 ↗
2. Liang N. · Nutrients · 2016 · 8 · 1610.3390/nu8010016 ↗
3. Naveed M. · Biomed. Pharmacother. · 2018 · 97 · 6710.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.064 ↗
4. Ramos L. F. · Clean. Circ. Bioeconomy · 2023 · 510.1016/j.clcb.2023.100048 ↗
5. Chokkareddy R. · Heliyon · 2019 · 510.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01457 ↗
6. Tao K. J. · J. Anal. Test. · 2023 · 7 · 2510.1007/s41664-022-00237-9 ↗
7. Wang X. · Food Chem. · 2019 · 278 · 17010.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.041 ↗
8. Liu Y. · Talanta · 2021 · 23310.1016/j.talanta.2021.122465 ↗
9. Shin Y.‐H. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2021 · 16810.1149/1945-7111/abd494 ↗
10. He H. · Trends Food Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 119 · 24310.1016/j.tifs.2021.11.029 ↗
11. Ding Y. · Chin. Chem. Lett. · 2024 · 3510.1016/j.cclet.2023.109008 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10847‐020‐01004‐y10.1007/s10847‐020‐01004‐y ↗
13. Ivanov A. S. · Org. Biomol. Chem. · 2014 · 12 · 614510.1039/C4OB01018C ↗
14. Monti D. · J Sens · 2009 · 200910.1155/2009/856053 ↗
15. Chen J. · Chin. Chem. Lett. · 2020 · 31 · 139810.1016/j.cclet.2020.03.052 ↗
16. Chen J. · Sens. Actuators B · 2018 · 254 · 47510.1016/j.snb.2017.07.125 ↗
17. Yang Y. · Anal. Chim. Acta · 2009 · 636 · 8310.1016/j.aca.2009.01.038 ↗
18. Gao M. · ACS Sens. · 2017 · 2 · 138210.1021/acssensors.7b00551 ↗
19. Wang Y.‐K. · Nature · 2024 · 629 · 58610.1038/s41586-024-07363-7 ↗
20. Dong Y. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2020 · 15 · 66810.1038/s41565-020-0714-5 ↗
21. Li H.‐H. · Adv. Mater. · 2024 · 3610.1002/adma.202403076 ↗
22. Čeklovski A. · Cent. Eur. J. Chem. · 2013 · 11 · 1132
23. Hassen J. H. · Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. · 2024 · 38 · 11110.15255/CABEQ.2023.2279 ↗
24. Lascu A. · Mater. Res. Bull. · 2016 · 74 · 32510.1016/j.materresbull.2015.10.032 ↗
25. Paris E. C. · Chem. Eng. · 2020 · 28 · 1884
26. Ion R. M. · Kinet. Mech. Cat · 2016 · 118 · 33710.1007/s11144-016-0982-0 ↗
27. Tahara Y. · Molecules · 2024 · 29 · 373810.3390/molecules29163738 ↗
28. Tsukamoto T. · Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. · 2015 · 88 · 57810.1246/bcsj.20140378 ↗
29. Hu Q. · Food Chem. · 2023 · 40410.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134395 ↗
30. Popa C. V. · Anal. Lett. · 2020 · 53 · 62710.1080/00032719.2019.1662430 ↗
31. Vallejos S. · Food Control · 2019 · 10610.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.010 ↗
32. De León‐Ramírez J. I. · PLoS One · 2025 · 2010.1371/journal.pone.0324997 ↗
33. Yang J. · Coatings · 2024 · 14 · 152410.3390/coatings14121524 ↗
34. Stanimirova T. · Geol. Balc. · 2023 · 52 · 41
35. Mozgawa W. · J. Mol. Struct. · 2001 · 596 · 12910.1016/S0022-2860(01)00741-4 ↗
36. Król M. · Microporous Mesoporous Mater. · 2012 · 156 · 18110.1016/j.micromeso.2012.02.040 ↗
37. Bordiga S. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2015 · 44 · 726210.1039/C5CS00396B ↗
38. Ramirez J. I. D. L. · Microporous Mesoporous Mater. · 2024 · 38010.1016/j.micromeso.2024.113295 ↗
39. Koleżyński A. · Spectrosc. · 2016 · 157 · 17
40. Hasan F. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2012 · 382 · 110.1016/j.jcis.2012.05.027 ↗
41. Zhang H. · J. Membr. Sci. · 2023 · 67110.1016/j.memsci.2023.121391 ↗
42. Sadeghi P. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2024 · 67810.1016/j.apsusc.2024.161037 ↗
43. Yang H. · Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. · 2018 · 189 · 13910.1016/j.saa.2017.07.065 ↗
44. Khaksar Haghani S. · IEEE Sensors J. · 2020 · 20 · 569110.1109/JSEN.2020.2972040 ↗
45. Liu Q. · Talanta · 2021 · 22110.1016/j.talanta.2020.121372 ↗
46. Pan C. J. · J. Anal. Chem. · 2023 · 51
47. Wang S. · Water Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 81 · 12110.2166/wst.2020.083 ↗
48. Meirelles M. R. · Magnetochemistry · 2023 · 9 · 13610.3390/magnetochemistry9050136 ↗
49. Hambright P. · Inorg. Chem. · 1976 · 15 · 231410.1021/ic50163a072 ↗
50. Rouquerol J. · Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. · 2007 · 160 · 4910.1016/S0167-2991(07)80008-5 ↗
51. Lakowicz J. R. · 200610.1007/978-0-387-46312-4 ↗
52. Brouwer A. M. · Pure Appl. Chem. · 2011 · 83 · 221310.1351/PAC-REP-10-09-31 ↗