Deep Learning for Size‐Agnostic Inverse Design of Random‐Network 3D Printed Mechanical Metamaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Practical applications of mechanical metamaterials often involve solving inverse problems aimed at finding microarchitectures that give rise to certain properties. The limited resolution of additive manufacturing techniques often requires solving such inverse problems for specific specimen sizes. Moreover, the candidate microarchitectures should be resistant to fatigue and fracture. Such a multi‐objective inverse design problem is formidably difficult to solve but its solution is the key to real‐world applications of mechanical metamaterials. Here, a modular approach titled “Deep‐DRAM” that combines four decoupled models is proposed, including two deep learning (DL) models, a deep generative model based on conditional variational autoencoders, and direct finite element (FE) simulations. Deep‐DRAM integrates these models into a framework capable of finding many solutions to the posed multi‐objective inverse design problem based on random‐network unit cells. Using an extensive set of simulations as well as experiments performed on 3D printed specimens, it is demonstrate that: 1) the predictions of the DL models are in agreement with FE simulations and experimental observations, 2) an enlarged envelope of achievable elastic properties (e.g., rare combinations of double auxeticity and high stiffness) is realized using the proposed approach, and 3) Deep‐DRAM can provide many solutions to the considered multi‐objective inverse design problem.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Topology Optimization in Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomechanical Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Maritime and Materials Engineering Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) Mekelweg 2 Delft 2628 CD The Netherlands
Division of Image Processing (LKEB) Radiology Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) Albinusdreef 2 Leiden 2333 ZA The Netherlands
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C7MH00699C10.1039/C7MH00699C ↗
2. 10.1038/s41578-020-0204-210.1038/s41578-020-0204-2 ↗
3. 10.1039/C9BM01247H10.1039/C9BM01247H ↗
4. 10.1126/scirobotics.aav787410.1126/scirobotics.aav7874 ↗
5. 10.1126/scirobotics.aay902410.1126/scirobotics.aay9024 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.9b1384010.1021/acsami.9b13840 ↗
7. 10.1002/adem.20180086410.1002/adem.201800864 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10795010.1016/j.matdes.2019.107950 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20200808210.1002/adma.202008082 ↗
10. 10.1039/C6MH00065G10.1039/C6MH00065G ↗
11. 10.1177/108128651773569510.1177/1081286517735695 ↗
12. 10.1038/nmat313410.1038/nmat3134 ↗
13. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.6610.1038/natrevmats.2017.66 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.125229110.1126/science.1252291 ↗
15. 10.1126/sciadv.150159510.1126/sciadv.1501595 ↗
16. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.110.1038/natrevmats.2016.1 ↗
17. 10.1088/0034-4885/76/12/12650110.1088/0034-4885/76/12/126501 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.12.01510.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.12.015 ↗
19. 10.1038/s43246-022-00270-210.1038/s43246-022-00270-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10868410.1016/j.matdes.2020.108684 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.509659010.1063/1.5096590 ↗
22. 10.1140/epjb/e2018-90073-110.1140/epjb/e2018-90073-1 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.508302710.1063/1.5083027 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.10010110.1103/PhysRevB.98.100101 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.171744211510.1073/pnas.1717442115 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20190111110.1002/adma.201901111 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cma.2020.11337710.1016/j.cma.2020.113377 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10909810.1016/j.matdes.2020.109098 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41524-020-0341-610.1038/s41524-020-0341-6 ↗
30. 10.1145/342262210.1145/3422622 ↗
31. D. P.Kingma M.Welling ArXiv: 1312.6114 2013.
32. 10.1039/D0CP03508D10.1039/D0CP03508D ↗
33. 10.1038/s41524-020-00352-010.1038/s41524-020-00352-0 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.eml.2020.10099210.1016/j.eml.2020.100992 ↗
35. 10.1126/science.aat266310.1126/science.aat2663 ↗
36. 10.1088/1361-651X/accfb510.1088/1361-651X/accfb5 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.mattod.2023.03.00710.1016/j.mattod.2023.03.007 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jmps.2022.10509810.1016/j.jmps.2022.105098 ↗
39. D. P.Kingma J. A.Ba ArXiv: 1412.6980 2014.
40. 10.1115/1.404422910.1115/1.4044229 ↗
41. Oh S. · Proc. Des. Soc.: Des. Conf. · 2020 · 1 · 460
42. 10.1016/j.eml.2020.10102910.1016/j.eml.2020.101029 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41524-022-00879-410.1038/s41524-022-00879-4 ↗
44. 10.1039/D1DD00007A10.1039/D1DD00007A ↗
45. 10.1016/j.infsof.2020.10640910.1016/j.infsof.2020.106409 ↗
46. S.Liang Y.Li R.Srikant ArXiv: 1706.02690 2017.10.1021/acscatal.7b00155 ↗
47. 10.1006/jmps.1999.127910.1006/jmps.1999.1279 ↗
48. 10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_56510.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_565 ↗
49. 10.1121/1.493400610.1121/1.4934006 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10963210.1016/j.matdes.2021.109632 ↗
51. S.Sankararaman K.McLemore S.Mahadevan inTopics in Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Vol. 4 Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series(Eds:T.Simmermacher S.Cogan L. G.Horta R.Barthorpe) Springer New York pp.67–74.
52. 10.1557/s43579-022-00288-010.1557/s43579-022-00288-0 ↗
53. 10.1007/978-3-319-23871-5_310.1007/978-3-319-23871-5_3 ↗
54. 10.1002/adma.20190484510.1002/adma.201904845 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.finmec.2021.10005410.1016/j.finmec.2021.100054 ↗
56. 10.1002/aenm.20230198510.1002/aenm.202301985 ↗
57. 10.1038/s43588-023-00471-w10.1038/s43588-023-00471-w ↗
58. 10.1038/s44172-022-00037-010.1038/s44172-022-00037-0 ↗
59. 10.3390/ma1515545710.3390/ma15155457 ↗
60. 10.1021/acsabm.3c0014510.1021/acsabm.3c00145 ↗
61. 10.1063/5.014445410.1063/5.0144454 ↗
62. 10.1109/JIOT.2016.257919810.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198 ↗
63. 10.1109/JPROC.2019.292197710.1109/JPROC.2019.2921977 ↗
64. Cormen T. H. · 2022
65. 10.1186/s13321-018-0286-710.1186/s13321-018-0286-7 ↗
66. Sohn K. · 2015