journal article·2024-05Open access

Important Role of Ion Flux Regulated by Separators in Lithium Metal Batteries

Hao Jia, Chao Zeng, Hyung‐Seok Lim, Ashley Simmons, Yuepeng Zhang, Marc H. Weber, Mark H. Engelhard, Peiyuan Gao, Chaojiang Niu, Zhijie Xu, Ji‐Guang Zhang, Wu Xu

Advanced Materials· Volume 36· Issue 19

Abstract

Abstract Polyolefin separators are the most common separators used in rechargeable lithium (Li)‐ion batteries. However, the influence of different polyolefin separators on the performance of Li metal batteries (LMBs) has not been well studied. By performing particle injection simulations on the reconstructed three‐dimensional pores of different polyethylene separators, it is revealed that the pore structure of the separator has a significant impact on the ion flux distribution, the Li deposition behavior, and consequently, the cycle life of LMBs. It is also discovered that the homogeneity factor of Li‐ion toward Li metal electrode is positively correlated to the longevity and reproducibility of LMBs. This work not only emphasizes the importance of the pore structure of polyolefin separators but also provides an economic and effective method to screen favorable separators for LMBs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Energy and Environment Directorate Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA 99354 USA

Physical and Computational Sciences Directorate Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA 99354 USA

Applied Materials Division Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL 60439 USA

Institute of Materials Research Washington State University Pullman WA 99164 USA

Funding

Vehicle Technologies Office

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2017.1610.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41560-019-0338-x10.1038/s41560-019-0338-x ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0154510.1021/acsenergylett.0c01545 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.etran.2023.10023910.1016/j.etran.2023.100239 ↗
5. 10.1039/C3EE40795K10.1039/C3EE40795K ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20170610210.1002/adma.201706102 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.03.01510.1016/j.matt.2020.03.015 ↗
8. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.1010.1038/nenergy.2016.10 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41560-021-00852-310.1038/s41560-021-00852-3 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms905810.1038/ncomms9058 ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.9b1019510.1021/jacs.9b10195 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41560-021-00917-310.1038/s41560-021-00917-3 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-021-00917-310.1038/s41560-021-00917-3 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.0c0435510.1021/acsami.0c04355 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.6b0873010.1021/jacs.6b08730 ↗
16. 10.1039/D2NR01097F10.1039/D2NR01097F ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20190594010.1002/adfm.201905940 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.01810.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.018 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0080110.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00801 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20221246610.1002/adfm.202212466 ↗
21. 10.1039/D3EE00664F10.1039/D3EE00664F ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20210293810.1002/adfm.202102938 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20220143010.1002/adfm.202201430 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11900110.1016/j.memsci.2020.119001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.00910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.009 ↗
26. 10.1039/C7TA11259A10.1039/C7TA11259A ↗
27. 10.1038/s41560-018-0199-810.1038/s41560-018-0199-8 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.1c1740810.1021/acsami.1c17408 ↗
29. 10.1002/admi.20210189110.1002/admi.202101891 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20220330710.1002/aenm.202203307 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41560-019-0464-510.1038/s41560-019-0464-5 ↗
32. 10.1149/2.0811606jes10.1149/2.0811606jes ↗
33. 10.1038/s41560-018-0295-910.1038/s41560-018-0295-9 ↗
34. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
35. U.Schilcher M.Gyarmati C.Bettstetter Y. W.Chung Y. H.Kim presented atVTC Spring 2008 – IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. Marina Bay Singapore 2008.
36. 10.1524/zpch.2009.608610.1524/zpch.2009.6086 ↗