journal article·2026-05Open access

New Insights in the Electrochemical Stability of Various Solid Polymer Electrolytes/Layered Positive Metal‐Oxide Electrode Interfaces in Solid‐State Lithium‐Ion Battery

Alexandre Roelens, Ashish Raj, Meron D. Tuemay, Lieven Bekaert, Xinhua Zhu, Mats Meeusen, Frank De Proft, Jean‐François Gohy, Annick Hubin, Mesfin H. Mamme

Abstract

All‐solid‐state battery is a promising solution to make lithium batteries safer while boosting their energy density. Solid polymer electrolytes offer a cheaper alternative to inorganic solid electrolyte. Solid polymer electrolytes even outperform inorganic solid electrolytes in some domains; for example, they are less prone to mechanical failure or to contact loss with electrodes upon cycles. However, there are still a couple of challenges to address, including the solid electrolyte/positive electrode interface degradation. The interface between solid polymer electrolyte and the positive electrode is largely overlooked in favor of that of the negative electrode. Ab initio molecular dynamics was combined with relative bond length change analysis and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy to study the compatibility of a broad selection of functional groups with two grades of Ni‐rich NMC cathode (NMC622, NMC811). The results emphasize the relative reactivity of NMC811 compared to NMC622. It was observed that Li is mostly responsible for triggering chemical degradation by interacting with negatively charged atoms from functional groups. Results revealed that hydroxyl or amine deprotonation is a major mechanism of interface degradation that leads to capacity fading. The role of the electric field during cycling was also investigated, showing how it affects functional group orientation and interactions with the NMC electrode.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Sustainable Materials Engineering (SUME), Electrochemical and Surface Engineering (SURF), Department of Materials and Chemistry Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Pleinlaan 2 1050 Brussels Belgium

Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences Université catholique de Louvain Place Louis Pasteur 1 1348 Louvain‐La‐Neuve Belgium

Algemene Chemie (ALGC), Department of Chemistry Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Pleinlaan 2 1050 Brussels Belgium

Funding

Vlaamse regering · Vlaams Supercomputer Centrum

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. H.Ritchie CO2and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical report OurWorldInData.org 2020 https://ourworldindata.org/ghg‐emissions‐by‐sector(accessed: June 2024).
2. United Nation World Population to Reach 8 Billion on 15 November 2022. 2022 https://www.un.org/en/desa/world‐population‐reach‐8‐billion‐15‐november‐2022(accessed: June 2024).
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Climate Change Indicators: Greenhouse Gases.2022 https://www.epa.gov/climate‐indicators/greenhouse‐gasesvisit(accessed: January 2023).
4. International Energy Agency Global EV Data Explorer.2022 https://www.iea.org/data‐and‐statistics/data‐tools/global‐ev‐data‐explorer(accessed: June 2024).
5. European Commission Renewable Energy Targets. n.d. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/renewable‐energy/renewable‐energy‐directive‐targets‐and‐rules/renewable‐energy‐targets(accessed: June 2024).
6. European Commission Fit for 55.2022 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/green‐deal/fit‐for‐55/(accessed: June 2024).
7. Reddy T. B. · 2019
8. 10.1002/978352762902210.1002/9783527629022 ↗
9. 10.1039/b904116h10.1039/b904116h ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.05.01310.1016/j.ensm.2017.05.013 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.00210.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.02.01010.1016/j.joule.2020.02.010 ↗
13. Doughty D. H. · 2019 · 825
14. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.00910.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.009 ↗
16. 10.1038/nnano.2017.1610.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
17. Xu W. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 2513
18. 10.3389/fchem.2018.0061610.3389/fchem.2018.00616 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.00910.1016/j.joule.2018.07.009 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0093110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00931 ↗
21. 10.1039/C8TA12147H10.1039/C8TA12147H ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20200268910.1002/aenm.202002689 ↗
23. Fang X. · Polymers · 2021 · 13 · 8
24. 10.1039/C7TA03199H10.1039/C7TA03199H ↗
25. 10.1016/j.rser.2023.11413610.1016/j.rser.2023.114136 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22991910.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229919 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41578-019-0157-510.1038/s41578-019-0157-5 ↗
28. He Y. · Polymers · 2020 · 12 · 9
29. Kouhestani H. S. · Energies · 2022 · 15 · 18
30. 10.1007/s11012-020-01209-y10.1007/s11012-020-01209-y ↗
31. Shang S. · J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. · 2022 · 55 · 20
32. 10.1038/s41467-020-19528-910.1038/s41467-020-19528-9 ↗
33. 10.3390/en1206107410.3390/en12061074 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mtener.2022.10106610.1016/j.mtener.2022.101066 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.01710.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.017 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10547510.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105475 ↗
37. 10.1039/D1MA00857A10.1039/D1MA00857A ↗
38. 10.3389/fenrg.2020.0020210.3389/fenrg.2020.00202 ↗
39. Bekaert L. · J. Phys. Chem. · 2023 · 127 · 8503
40. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.00810.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.008 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.08.00510.1016/j.mattod.2021.08.005 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41467-017-01187-y10.1038/s41467-017-01187-y ↗
43. 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.02.01110.1016/j.mattod.2021.02.011 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsami.4c0609510.1021/acsami.4c06095 ↗
45. Bekaert L. · J. Phys. Chem. · 2022 · 126 · 8227
46. 10.1002/mame.20210079110.1002/mame.202100791 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12256810.1016/j.polymer.2020.122568 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsomega.4c0248410.1021/acsomega.4c02484 ↗
49. Richards W. D. · Chem. Mater. · 2015 · 28 · 1266
50. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0206210.1021/acsenergylett.4c02062 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0060210.1021/acsaem.0c00602 ↗
52. 10.1126/science.adg468710.1126/science.adg4687 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.32410.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.324 ↗
54. Cui Z. · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2023 · 62 · 43
55. 10.1038/s41598-023-36271-510.1038/s41598-023-36271-5 ↗
56. 10.1039/D4SM00405A10.1039/D4SM00405A ↗
57. Frisch M. J. · 2016
58. 10.3390/app918367110.3390/app9183671 ↗
59. 10.1002/celc.20200060810.1002/celc.202000608 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
61. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
64. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
65. 10.1107/S002188981103897010.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
66. 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
67. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-510.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
68. 10.1002/jcc.2178710.1002/jcc.21787 ↗
69. R. J.Gowers M.Linke J.Barnoud T. J. E.Reddy M. N.Melo S. L.Seyler J.Domański D.Dotson S.Buchoux I.Kenney O.Beckstein inProc. 15th Python Sci. Conf. Austin TX 2016 pp. 98–105.10.25080/Majora-629e541a-00e ↗
70. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
71. 10.1002/jcc.2057510.1002/jcc.20575 ↗
72. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/08420410.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204 ↗
73. 10.1063/1.355371610.1063/1.3553716 ↗