journal article·2021-11

Electro‐Optic Activity in Excess of 1000 pm V−1 Achieved via Theory‐Guided Organic Chromophore Design

Huajun Xu, Delwin L. Elder, Lewis E. Johnson, Yovan de Coene, Scott R. Hammond, Wouter Vander Ghinst, Koen Clays, Larry R. Dalton, Bruce H. Robinson

Advanced Materials· Volume 33· Issue 45
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract High performance organic electro‐optic (OEO) materials enable ultrahigh bandwidth, small footprint, and extremely low drive voltage in silicon‐organic hybrid and plasmonic‐organic hybrid photonic devices. However, practical OEO materials under device‐relevant conditions are generally limited to performance of ≈300 pm V−1 (10× the EO response of lithium niobate). By means of theory‐guided design, a new series of OEO chromophores is demonstrated, based on strong bis(4‐dialkylaminophenyl)phenylamino electron donating groups, capable of EO coefficients (r33) in excess of 1000 pm V−1. Density functional theory modeling and hyper‐Rayleigh scattering measurements are performed and confirm the large improvement in hyperpolarizability due to the stronger donor. The EO performance of the exemplar chromophore in the series, BAY1, is evaluated neat and at various concentrations in polymer host and shows a nearly linear increase in r33 and poling efficiency (r33/Ep, Ep is poling field) with increasing chromophore concentration. 25 wt% BAY1/polymer composite shows a higher poling efficiency (3.9 ± 0.1 nm2 V−2) than state‐of‐the‐art neat chromophores. Using a high‐ε charge blocking layer with BAY1, a record‐high r33 (1100 ± 100 pm V−1) and poling efficiency (17.8 ± 0.8 nm2 V−2) at 1310 nm are achieved. This is the first reported OEO material with electro‐optic response larger than thin‐film barium titanate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Optical Materials Research · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry University of Washington Box 351700 Seattle WA 98195 USA

Nonlinear Materials Corporation 2212 Queen Anne Ave North, Box #324 Seattle WA 98109 USA

Department of Chemistry University of Leuven Celestijnenlaan 200D Leuven 3001 Belgium

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research · University of Washington College of Arts and Sciences · National Science Foundation

References (80)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.508686810.1063/1.5086868 ↗
2. 10.1109/JLT.2014.235513710.1109/JLT.2014.2355137 ↗
3. L. R.Dalton B. H.Robinson D. L.Elder A. F.Tillack L. E.Johnson inProc. SPIE2017 10364 1036402.
4. 10.1117/1.AP.3.2.02400310.1117/1.AP.3.2.024003 ↗
5. 10.1038/lsa.2014.5410.1038/lsa.2014.54 ↗
6. 10.1364/OE.22.00362910.1364/OE.22.003629 ↗
7. 10.1038/lsa.2015.2810.1038/lsa.2015.28 ↗
8. 10.1109/JLT.2015.239421110.1109/JLT.2015.2394211 ↗
9. 10.1109/JLT.2015.249976310.1109/JLT.2015.2499763 ↗
10. 10.1364/OPTICA.5.00073910.1364/OPTICA.5.000739 ↗
11. 10.1364/OE.26.02795510.1364/OE.26.027955 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41598-017-19061-810.1038/s41598-017-19061-8 ↗
13. 10.1364/OE.39031510.1364/OE.390315 ↗
14. 10.1088/2058-9565/ab7eed10.1088/2058-9565/ab7eed ↗
15. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.910.1038/nphoton.2014.9 ↗
16. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.12710.1038/nphoton.2015.127 ↗
17. 10.1109/JPROC.2016.254799010.1109/JPROC.2016.2547990 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.aan595310.1126/science.aan5953 ↗
19. 10.1364/OE.25.00262710.1364/OE.25.002627 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0022410.1021/acsphotonics.7b00224 ↗
21. 10.1364/OE.25.00176210.1364/OE.25.001762 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41586-018-0031-410.1038/s41586-018-0031-4 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-019-09724-710.1038/s41467-019-09724-7 ↗
24. 10.1364/OE.38482510.1364/OE.384825 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41928-020-0417-910.1038/s41928-020-0417-9 ↗
26. 10.35848/1347-4065/abef1310.35848/1347-4065/abef13 ↗
27. 10.1364/OE.24.02560810.1364/OE.24.025608 ↗
28. 10.1021/cr900042910.1021/cr9000429 ↗
29. 10.1039/D0TC03224G10.1039/D0TC03224G ↗
30. S. J.Benight S. R.Hammond L. E.Johnson D. L.Elder inProc. SPIE 2020 11467 114671H https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2569081.10.1117/12.2569081 ↗
31. 10.1021/ja067970s10.1021/ja067970s ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20080163910.1002/adma.200801639 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20110494910.1002/adma.201104949 ↗
34. 10.1021/cm403493510.1021/cm4034935 ↗
35. 10.1039/C6TC00358C10.1039/C6TC00358C ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0202010.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02020 ↗
37. 10.1002/aelm.20170013810.1002/aelm.201700138 ↗
38. 10.1039/C8QM00006A10.1039/C8QM00006A ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.9b0530610.1021/acsami.9b05306 ↗
40. 10.1039/C9QM00508K10.1039/C9QM00508K ↗
41. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.03910.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.039 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.488482910.1063/1.4884829 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0372510.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03725 ↗
44. 10.1021/ar800264w10.1021/ar800264w ↗
45. 10.1021/jp102242310.1021/jp1022423 ↗
46. 10.1039/C5TC01049G10.1039/C5TC01049G ↗
47. 10.1038/s41563-018-0208-010.1038/s41563-018-0208-0 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.04.00210.1016/j.physrep.2013.04.002 ↗
49. 10.1364/JOSAB.33.00E12110.1364/JOSAB.33.00E121 ↗
50. 10.1021/cm062340a10.1021/cm062340a ↗
51. 10.1039/D0TC05700B10.1039/D0TC05700B ↗
52. 10.1364/JOSAB.33.00E10910.1364/JOSAB.33.00E109 ↗
53. 10.1021/ar500072710.1021/ar5000727 ↗
54. 10.1109/JLT.2018.286588210.1109/JLT.2018.2865882 ↗
55. 10.1021/ja800742410.1021/ja8007424 ↗
56. 10.1039/C5TC00723B10.1039/C5TC00723B ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.298010.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2980 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.114253810.1063/1.1142538 ↗
59. 10.1364/OE.17.00458710.1364/OE.17.004587 ↗
60. L.Johnson H.Xu Y.deCoene D.Elder K.Clays L.Dalton B.Robinson inProc. SPIE 2019 11089 110890K https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2530719.10.1117/12.2530719 ↗
61. L.Johnson H.Xu S.Hammond D.Elder S.Benight Y.deCoene J.Hesse‐Withbroe K.Clays L.Dalton B.Robinson inProc. SPIE 2020 11471 114710B https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2568921.10.1117/12.2568921 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.345365910.1063/1.3453659 ↗
63. 10.1023/A:101991231265410.1023/A:1019912312654 ↗
64. Marvinwas used for characterizing chemical structures Marvin version 21.9.0 ChemAxon (https://www.chemaxon.com).
65. L.Johnson D.Elder A.Kocherzhenko A.Tillack C.Isborn L.Dalton B.Robinson inProc. SPIE2018 10738 107381A.
66. L. E.Johnson D. L.Elder H.Xu S. R.Hammond S. J.Benight K.O'Malley B. H.Robinson L. R.Dalton inProc. SPIE2021 11812 1181202.
67. 10.1021/jp712037j10.1021/jp712037j ↗
68. 10.1039/c2cc34747d10.1039/c2cc34747d ↗
69. 10.1021/ol701814r10.1021/ol701814r ↗
70. 10.1021/jz300922r10.1021/jz300922r ↗
71. 10.1063/1.10310710.1063/1.103107 ↗
72. 10.1063/1.35942910.1063/1.359429 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.01.01510.1016/j.dyepig.2019.01.015 ↗
74. 10.1039/C4TC00508B10.1039/C4TC00508B ↗
75. D.Elder L.Johnson A.Tillack B.Robinson C.Haffner W.Heni C.Hoessbacher Y.Fedoryshyn Y.Salamin B.Baeuerle A.Josten M.Ayata U.Koch J.Leuthold L.Dalton inProc. SPIE2018 10529 105290K.
76. Tillack A. F. · 2015
77. 10.1557/opl.2014.79510.1557/opl.2014.795 ↗
78. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0004510.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00045 ↗
79. 10.1364/OE.22.02772510.1364/OE.22.027725 ↗
80. 10.1063/1.475459710.1063/1.4754597 ↗