Insights into the Structure Stability of Prussian Blue for Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
The reversible storage of Zn2+ ions in Prussian blue analogues with typical aqueous solution was challenged by fast degradation and poor coulombic efficiency, while the mechanism is yet to be uncovered. This study correlates the performance of the nickel hexacyanoferrate to the dynamics of H2O in the electrolyte and the associated phase stability of the electrode. It demonstrates severe Ni dissolution in conventional diluted aqueous electrolyte (1 m ZnSO4 or 1 m Zn(TFSI)2), leading to structure collapse with the formation of an electrochemical inert phase. This is regarded as the descriptor for the fast decay of nickel hexacyanoferrate in diluted aqueous electrolyte. However, a well‐preserved open framework for zinc storage was obtained in concentrated aqueous electrolyte (1 m Zn(TFSI)2 + 21 m LiTFSI)—the H2O activity is highly suppressed by extensive coordination—thus, reversible capacity of 60.2 mAh g−1 over 1600 cycles could be delivered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Chem/Bio‐Sensing and Chemometrics Advanced Catalytic Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Hunan University Changsha 410082 China
State Grid Shanghai Municipal Electric Power Company 310 South of Chongqing Road Shanghai 200025 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cm901452z10.1021/cm901452z ↗
2. 10.1126/science.121274110.1126/science.1212741 ↗
3. 10.1039/c0ee00831a10.1039/c0ee00831a ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.00310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.003 ↗
5. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.11910.1038/nenergy.2016.119 ↗
6. 10.1039/C8EE01651H10.1039/C8EE01651H ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20110630710.1002/anie.201106307 ↗
8. 10.1021/cm504717p10.1021/cm504717p ↗
9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.03110.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.031 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20120685410.1002/anie.201206854 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20160400710.1002/adma.201604007 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0004010.1021/acsenergylett.7b00040 ↗
13. 10.1002/cssc.20190306710.1002/cssc.201903067 ↗
14. 10.1002/eem2.1206010.1002/eem2.12060 ↗
15. Li C. · Energy Environ. Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 2
16. 10.1016/j.isci.2018.04.00810.1016/j.isci.2018.04.008 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.01710.1016/j.joule.2018.07.017 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.083 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.6b0159210.1021/acsami.6b01592 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20140093010.1002/aenm.201400930 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.11.01410.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.11.014 ↗
22. Zhang L. · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.065 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41560-019-0388-010.1038/s41560-019-0388-0 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.aab159510.1126/science.aab1595 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.12.00710.1016/j.joule.2019.12.007 ↗
27. 10.1039/c2cc31777j10.1039/c2cc31777j ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20180609210.1002/adma.201806092 ↗
29. 10.1021/ja512383b10.1021/ja512383b ↗
30. 10.1021/nl203193q10.1021/nl203193q ↗
31. 10.1039/c3ta13205f10.1039/c3ta13205f ↗
32. 10.1038/s41563-018-0063-z10.1038/s41563-018-0063-z ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.9b1414910.1021/acsami.9b14149 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.00510.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.005 ↗
35. Avila M. · Chem. Commun · 2005 · 3322
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.07910.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.079 ↗
37. 10.1002/aenm.20140186910.1002/aenm.201401869 ↗