journal article·2026-03Open access

Engineering a Stable Solid–Electrolyte Interphase through a Novel Trifluoromethyl‐Free Lithium Salt for Lithium Metal Polymer Batteries

Lorena García, David Fraile‐Insagurbe, Izaskun Serna, Itziar Aldalur, Leire Meabe, Mikel Arrese‐Igor, Rosalía Cid, Julen Etxabe, Michel Armand, Maria Martinez‐Ibañez

Abstract

The deployment of safe and high‐energy density lithium metal polymer batteries (LMPBs) still requires further advances in the quest for new solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs). In this regard, salt anions have a decisive role in the overall SPE performance. While lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) was chosen earlier to have a highly flexible sulfonimide center and an extensively delocalized negative charge, it still suffers from several drawbacks ascribed to its poor interfacial compatibility with the lithium metal (LiM) anode and the fact that it is a PFAS. In this work, a novel lithium salt is cunningly designed, aiming to combine the advantages of previously reported lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) and lithium bis(difluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiDFSI) to overcome the limitations of the state‐of‐the‐art SPE based on LiTFSI/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). The SPE containing the developed (difluoromethanesulfonyl)(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiDFFSI) salt presented reduced interfacial resistance and improved compatibility with the lithium metal (LiM) anode compared with LiTFSI/PEO, enabled by the formation of a stable, uniform, and ionically conductive solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI). In addition, LiDFFSI‐based SPEs demonstrated a prolonged cycling stability, achieving over 125 cycles at C/10 with minimal capacity fading in LiM||LiFePO 4 cell configuration. These findings evidence how a rational design of the lithium salt chemistry allows tuning the formed SEI, directly impacting the overall SPE performance. Thus, LiDFFSI is presented as a promising alternative lithium salt to improve electrochemical performance and interfacial stability in next‐generation LiM batteries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre of Cooperative Research on Alternative Energies (CIC energiGUNE) Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA) Alava Technology Park, Albert Einstein 48 01510 Vitoria‐Gasteiz Spain

Department of Applied Chemistry and Polymer Science & Technology University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) Paseo Manuel Lardizabal 3 20018 Donostia‐San Sebastian Spain

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación · European Social Fund Plus

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20180056110.1002/adma.201800561 ↗
2. 10.1038/451652a10.1038/451652a ↗
3. 10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.121274110.1126/science.1212741 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41928-018-0048-610.1038/s41928-018-0048-6 ↗
6. 10.1039/C3EE40795K10.1039/C3EE40795K ↗
7. 10.1039/D1EE00767J10.1039/D1EE00767J ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0011510.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 ↗
9. 10.1038/nnano.2017.1610.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0027510.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00275 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41560-021-00910-w10.1038/s41560-021-00910-w ↗
12. 10.1002/sus2.610.1002/sus2.6 ↗
13. 10.1002/ijch.20200006610.1002/ijch.202000066 ↗
14. 10.1002/pi.498007050510.1002/pi.4980070505 ↗
15. 10.1146/annurev.ms.16.080186.00133310.1146/annurev.ms.16.080186.001333 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.09910.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.099 ↗
17. 10.1021/ma00103a03410.1021/ma00103a034 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20181370010.1002/anie.201813700 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20190579410.1002/anie.201905794 ↗
20. 10.1002/smll.20220202710.1002/smll.202202027 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.23553910.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235539 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20200045510.1002/adfm.202000455 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20240456410.1002/adfm.202404564 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.10997010.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109970 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0252710.1021/acsenergylett.4c02527 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0009110.1021/acsaem.1c00091 ↗
27. 10.1002/aenm.20210283410.1002/aenm.202102834 ↗
28. 10.1039/D4TA02701A10.1039/D4TA02701A ↗
29. 10.1002/celc.20180147210.1002/celc.201801472 ↗
30. 10.1039/C8TA07936F10.1039/C8TA07936F ↗
31. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.10386210.1016/j.isci.2022.103862 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.8b2070610.1021/acsami.8b20706 ↗
33. 10.3390/en1422746710.3390/en14227467 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0145410.1021/acsaem.2c01454 ↗
35. 10.1039/C7TA05469F10.1039/C7TA05469F ↗
36. 10.1007/s11581-023-05296-110.1007/s11581-023-05296-1 ↗
37. 10.1002/anie.20170930510.1002/anie.201709305 ↗
38. 10.1039/D2RA01233B10.1039/D2RA01233B ↗
39. 10.1002/adfm.20230371810.1002/adfm.202303718 ↗
40. 10.1021/jacs.8b0461210.1021/jacs.8b04612 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.02210.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.022 ↗
42. 10.1021/jacs.2c0226010.1021/jacs.2c02260 ↗
43. 10.1039/C4CC06666A10.1039/C4CC06666A ↗
44. 10.1021/cr030203g10.1021/cr030203g ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22870810.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228708 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41563-021-01190-110.1038/s41563-021-01190-1 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0498710.1021/acs.jpcc.0c04987 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0703210.1021/acs.jpcc.2c07032 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41467-021-24297-010.1038/s41467-021-24297-0 ↗
50. 10.1021/ma400359810.1021/ma4003598 ↗
51. 10.1149/2754-2734/ad119d10.1149/2754-2734/ad119d ↗
52. 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00130-310.1016/S0167-2738(02)00130-3 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0059310.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00593 ↗
54. 10.1039/D1TA08362G10.1039/D1TA08362G ↗
55. 10.20517/energymater.2024.20310.20517/energymater.2024.203 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.00610.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.006 ↗
57. 10.1039/C9TA08795H10.1039/C9TA08795H ↗
58. 10.1002/sia.503310.1002/sia.5033 ↗
59. J. H.Scofield Theoretical Photoionization Cross Sections From 1 To 1500 KeV Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Technical Report USA1972.10.2172/4545040 ↗
60. 10.1021/acsami.3c1097710.1021/acsami.3c10977 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsami.1c2185310.1021/acsami.1c21853 ↗