journal article·2019-03

A 2D NiFe Bimetallic Metal–Organic Frameworks for Efficient Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis

Yongchao Hao, Qinglin Liu, Ying Zhou, Zeqian Yuan, Yanan Fan, Zhuofeng Ke, Cheng‐Yong Su, Guangqin Li

Publisher page

Abstract

The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is the cornerstone for many important energy conversion devices, including metal–air battery and water splitting. Herein, an optimized NiFe‐based metal–organic framework is developed as highly efficient active material for OER. It just needs a low overpotential of 0.31 V to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm−2 with a favorable Tafel slope of 43.7 mV dec−1 in 0.1 m KOH electrolyte for the as‐prepared Ni0.75Fe0.25 BDC, which is superior to RuO2. This efficient catalytic performance is due to the introduction of Fe in Ni‐based MOFs could benefit the kinetics and charge transfer efficiency, resulting in the optimal activity toward OER. Besides, the obtained active material demonstrates good stability, suggesting the great potential value in sustainable electrochemical energy storage and conversion devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

MOE Laboratory of Bioinorganic and Synthetic Chemistry Lehn Institute of Functional Materials School of Chemistry Sun Yat‐Sen University No. 135, Xingang Xi Road Guangzhou 510275 China

Key Laboratory for Polymeric Composite and Functional Materials of Ministry of Education School of Materials Science and Engineering Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou 510275 China

Funding

Sun Yat-sen University · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Society for the Teaching of Psychology

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C6CS00328A10.1039/C6CS00328A ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0005110.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00051 ↗
3. 10.1021/jacs.8b0454610.1021/jacs.8b04546 ↗
4. 10.1002/advs.20180006410.1002/advs.201800064 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20160227010.1002/adma.201602270 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.04410.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.044 ↗
7. 10.1039/C4CC01625D10.1039/C4CC01625D ↗
8. Xia W. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 1837 · 2015 · 8
9. 10.1002/aenm.20170051810.1002/aenm.201700518 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.12.00210.1016/j.chempr.2016.12.002 ↗
11. Coordin
12. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.18410.1038/nenergy.2016.184 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20140648410.1002/anie.201406484 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20170334110.1002/aenm.201703341 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20150938210.1002/anie.201509382 ↗
16. 10.1039/C6EE00100A10.1039/C6EE00100A ↗
17. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0359410.1021/acscatal.7b03594 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.01010.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.010 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.03110.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.031 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20170553810.1002/adma.201705538 ↗
21. 10.1021/ja508515710.1021/ja5085157 ↗
22. 10.1021/nn500880v10.1021/nn500880v ↗
23. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0022910.1021/acsenergylett.7b00229 ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20170601810.1002/adfm.201706018 ↗
25. 10.1039/C7TA09092G10.1039/C7TA09092G ↗
26. 10.1021/ja502379c10.1021/ja502379c ↗
27. 10.1021/jacs.6b1225010.1021/jacs.6b12250 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.8b0529410.1021/jacs.8b05294 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20170046710.1002/aenm.201700467 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20150190110.1002/adma.201501901 ↗
31. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0150310.1021/acscatal.6b01503 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.00610.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.006 ↗
33. 10.1002/aenm.20170190510.1002/aenm.201701905 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.07510.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.075 ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20160119810.1002/aenm.201601198 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.02910.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.029 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.07110.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.071 ↗