Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining strength, and materials science can both contribute to and profit from it. In a simultaneous progress race, new materials, systems, and processes can be devised and optimized thanks to machine learning (ML) techniques, and such progress can be turned into innovative computing platforms. Future materials scientists will profit from understanding how ML can boost the conception of advanced materials. This review covers aspects of computation from the fundamentals to directions taken and repercussions produced by computation to account for the origins, procedures, and applications of AI. ML and its methods are reviewed to provide basic knowledge of its implementation and its potential. The materials and systems used to implement AI with electric charges are finding serious competition from other information‐carrying and processing agents. The impact these techniques have on the inception of new advanced materials is so deep that a new paradigm is developing where implicit knowledge is being mined to conceive materials and systems for functions instead of finding applications to found materials. How far this trend can be carried is hard to fathom, as exemplified by the power to discover unheard of materials or physical laws buried in data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM) Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) Calle Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3 Madrid 28049 Spain
Donostia International Physics Centre (DIPC) Paseo Manuel de Lardizábal 4 San Sebastián 20018 España
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.120097010.1126/science.1200970 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevD.23.28710.1103/PhysRevD.23.287 ↗
3. Shannon C. E. · 1949
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.62310.1103/PhysRevLett.46.623 ↗
5. Bremermann H. J. · 1962
6. 10.1007/BF0185772610.1007/BF01857726 ↗
7. Bremermann H. J. · Proc. Fifth Berkeley Symp. Math. Stat. Probab. · 1965 · 222 · 15
8. 10.1063/5.006447510.1063/5.0064475 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00054-210.1016/S0167-2789(98)00054-2 ↗
10. 10.1088/0031-8949/1985/T9/02710.1088/0031-8949/1985/T9/027 ↗
11. 10.1147/rd.53.018310.1147/rd.53.0183 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10701-019-00289-510.1007/s10701-019-00289-5 ↗
13. Moore G. E. · Electronics · 1965 · 38 · 114
14. 10.1097/00004647-200110000-0000110.1097/00004647-200110000-00001 ↗
15. E.Strubell A.Ganesh A.McCallum AAAI 2020 – Proc. AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Washington DC USA2020 pp.1393–13696.
16. 10.1063/5.008717510.1063/5.0087175 ↗
17. Massively parallel is the common term used to describe the operation of a large number of computer processors (like a GPU with thousands of threads or a processor array with hundreds of thousands of central processing units) or separate computers (in a grid or a cluster) that simultaneously perform coordinated computations in parallel. These processors exchange tasks and require specialized software to exploit the vantages of parallel operation.
18. 10.1007/BF0170069210.1007/BF01700692 ↗
19. Effectivemeaning systematic mechanical not its current everyday sense implies that the procedure leading to a desired result can be carried out following a set of instructions in a finite number of steps without need for insight or other means than say paper and pencil. In fact in the years these concepts were being developed the termcomputerimplicitly referred tohuman computers people employed by businesses and governments to perform usingeffectivemethods the kind of tasks electronic computers do nowadays.
20. 10.2307/237104510.2307/2371045 ↗
21. 10.2307/226903110.2307/2269031 ↗
22. 10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.23010.1112/plms/s2-42.1.230 ↗
23. 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
24. Kolmogorov A. N. · Sankhya Indian J. Stat. Ser. A · 1963 · 25 · 369
25. 10.1016/S0019-9958(64)90223-210.1016/S0019-9958(64)90223-2 ↗
26. 10.1145/321356.32136310.1145/321356.321363 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00025-410.1016/S0370-1573(01)00025-4 ↗
28. 10.1109/85.23838910.1109/85.238389 ↗
29. In fact digital electronics as we know it nowadays was invented by Shannon[166]more than a decade prior to the inception of the transistor. In his MSc thesis he showed that the AND and OR boolean operations could be implemented with simple electronic circuits comprising two switches in series or parallel respectively. Just by adding a NOT (that could be embodied by a relay) any arbitrarily complex Boolean logic operation could be represented. Thus his choice wascomputationally completealthough just one among the various possible. It was adopted and had a great impact in digital logic in coming years.
30. 10.1109/JSSC.1989.57258710.1109/JSSC.1989.572587 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.158110.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1581 ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0265017910.1007/BF02650179 ↗
33. Ordinary computers need to run twice to determine the output of a functionfwhen the output to two values x1andx2are asked; whereas a quantum computer can be fed with an input state encoding bothx1andx2in a quantum superposition and run only once. Furthermore a superposition state encoding an exponential number of inputs can be processed in a single call. The catch is in that measurement renders useful output only once owing to the disturbance imposed by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.
34. 10.1098/rspa.1985.007010.1098/rspa.1985.0070 ↗
35. 10.1098/rspa.1992.016710.1098/rspa.1992.0167 ↗
36. 10.1109/SCT.1992.21538810.1109/SCT.1992.215388 ↗
37. 10.1137/S009753979529317210.1137/S0097539795293172 ↗
38. 10.1002/1521-3978(200009)48:9/11<771::AID-PROP771>3.0.CO;2-E10.1002/1521-3978(200009)48:9/11<771::AID-PROP771>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.101510.1103/PhysRevA.51.1015 ↗
40. 10.1126/science.273.5278.107310.1126/science.273.5278.1073 ↗
41. 10.2478/jagi-2014-000110.2478/jagi-2014-0001 ↗
42. Thomas Hobbes a 17th century philosopher in “De Corpore” 1655 expressed that reasoning meant computation in the sense that to compute is to calculate the sum of many things added together or to reckon the remainder when one thing is taken from another; reasoning therefore is the same as adding or subtracting.
43. 10.1145/1968.197210.1145/1968.1972 ↗
44. 10.1007/BF0011603710.1007/BF00116037 ↗
45. Weaver W. · Am. Sci. · 1948 · 36 · 536
46. 10.1002/adom.20180043910.1002/adom.201800439 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.01210.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 ↗
48. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.297619910.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976199 ↗
49. 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.5010.1109/TPAMI.2013.50 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.07710.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.077 ↗
51. 10.1007/s10462-019-09682-y10.1007/s10462-019-09682-y ↗
52. R. E.Korf AAAI Tech. Rep.1997 WS‐97‐04 1.10.5089/9781451835595.002 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0092-8240(05)80006-010.1016/S0092-8240(05)80006-0 ↗
54. 10.1037/h004251910.1037/h0042519 ↗
55. 10.1038/nature2427010.1038/nature24270 ↗
56. 10.1038/nature1454110.1038/nature14541 ↗
57. 10.1007/978-1-4612-0711-510.1007/978-1-4612-0711-5 ↗
58. 10.1109/MAES.2020.304307210.1109/MAES.2020.3043072 ↗
59. Mueller T. · Rev. Comput. Chem. · 2016 · 186
60. 10.1038/s42256-018-0006-z10.1038/s42256-018-0006-z ↗
61. 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X ↗
62. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-110.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1 ↗
63. 10.1145/130385.13042410.1145/130385.130424 ↗
64. 10.1007/BF0011682810.1007/BF00116828 ↗
65. 10.1002/cplx.613001051110.1002/cplx.6130010511 ↗
66. 10.1109/4235.58589310.1109/4235.585893 ↗
67. Russel S. · 2020
68. 10.1109/PGEC.1965.26413710.1109/PGEC.1965.264137 ↗
69. Boser B. E. · Perception · 1992 · 144
70. 10.1162/neco.1989.1.3.29510.1162/neco.1989.1.3.295 ↗
71. 10.1145/568574.56857510.1145/568574.568575 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.05310.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.053 ↗
73. 10.1007/978-3-030-43192-1_4110.1007/978-3-030-43192-1_41 ↗
74. L. J. P.van derMaaten E. O.Postma H. J.vanden Herik Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review Amsterdam The Netherlands 2009.
75. Jolliffe I. T. · 2002
76. 10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.000110.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 ↗
77. 10.1126/science.112764710.1126/science.1127647 ↗
78. 10.1002/978047031688710.1002/9780470316887 ↗
79. 10.1109/TKDE.2009.19110.1109/TKDE.2009.191 ↗
80. 10.1007/978-3-319-58347-110.1007/978-3-319-58347-1 ↗
81. 10.1186/s40537-016-0043-610.1186/s40537-016-0043-6 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.00910.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 ↗
83. 10.1109/5.5835610.1109/5.58356 ↗
84. 10.3389/fnins.2013.0011810.3389/fnins.2013.00118 ↗
85. 10.1109/2.48589110.1109/2.485891 ↗
86. 10.1007/BF0255127410.1007/BF02551274 ↗
87. 10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T ↗
88. 10.1016/j.neunet.2021.01.02610.1016/j.neunet.2021.01.026 ↗
89. P. Ramachandran B.Zoph Q. V.Le 6th Int. Conf. on Learning Representations ICLR 2018 – Work. Track Proc.2018 1.
90. Stinchcombe M. · 1990 · 7
91. I. J.Goodfellow D.Warde‐Farley M.Mirza A.Courville Y.Bengio in30th Int. Conf. Machine Learning ICML 2013 2013 pp.2356.
92. 10.1038/nature1453910.1038/nature14539 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.cosrev.2009.03.00510.1016/j.cosrev.2009.03.005 ↗
94. 10.1073/pnas.79.8.255410.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 ↗
95. 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.173510.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
96. LeCun Y. · 1989 · 396
97. 10.1098/rsta.2015.020310.1098/rsta.2015.0203 ↗
98. I. J.Goodfellow J.Pouget‐Abadie M.Mirza B.Xu D.Warde‐Farley S.Ozair A.Courville Y.Bengio NIPS'14: Proc. 27th Int. Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems ‐ Vol. 2 Association for Computing Machinery New York 2014 pp.2672–2680.
99. 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.00310.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
100. 10.1038/323533a010.1038/323533a0 ↗