Photocurrent Enhancement in Polythiophene‐ and Alkanethiol‐Modified ZnO Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Photocurrent enhancement and improvement in solar cell performance are found when the interface between ZnO and polythiophene layers is modified with insulating alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers. This result is correlated with increased structural order in the polymer and interchain contributions in the photocurrent, suggesting that improved exciton diffusion or reduced electron-hole recombination can outweigh the impedance in electron transfer at the heterojunction interface. Detailed facts of importance to specialist readers are published as ”Supporting Information”. Such documents are peer-reviewed, but not copy-edited or typeset. They are made available as submitted by the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/mrs2004.1610.1557/mrs2004.16 ↗
2. 10.1557/mrs2005.1010.1557/mrs2005.10 ↗
3. 10.1002/pip.80810.1002/pip.808 ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.071199010510.1073/pnas.0711990105 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat192810.1038/nmat1928 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja710079w10.1021/ja710079w ↗
7. 10.1021/jp073422510.1021/jp0734225 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20060021510.1002/adfm.200600215 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.161619710.1063/1.1616197 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.17910.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.179 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20070030510.1002/adfm.200700305 ↗
12. 10.1021/jp057137210.1021/jp0571372 ↗
13. 10.1021/jp056576y10.1021/jp056576y ↗
14. 10.1063/1.273797710.1063/1.2737977 ↗
15. 10.1038/4435910.1038/44359 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.156852610.1063/1.1568526 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.240079610.1063/1.2400796 ↗
18. D. C.Olson M. T.Lloyd Y.‐J.Lee J. W. P.Hsu unpublished.
19. 10.1002/adfm.20050057310.1002/adfm.200500573 ↗
20. 10.1021/jp055492m10.1021/jp055492m ↗
21. 10.1021/cm049598q10.1021/cm049598q ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat159010.1038/nmat1590 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja994468h10.1021/ja994468h ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.03541610.1103/PhysRevB.68.035416 ↗
25. 10.1021/ja065399r10.1021/ja065399r ↗
26. 10.1021/jp075781610.1021/jp0757816 ↗
27. 10.1016/0379-6779(88)90110-510.1016/0379-6779(88)90110-5 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.06420310.1103/PhysRevB.67.064203 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.240866110.1063/1.2408661 ↗
30. 10.1039/b602084d10.1039/b602084d ↗
31. 10.1021/jp077593l10.1021/jp077593l ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.08680210.1103/PhysRevLett.89.086802 ↗
33. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/01/01300110.1088/0953-8984/20/01/013001 ↗
34. The EQE spectra for the modified and unmodified devices were accurately reproduced using a WaveMetrics software (Igor Pro) algorithm that fit the data with five superimposed Gaussian peaks.
35. 10.1021/jp802626u10.1021/jp802626u ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20060243710.1002/adma.200602437 ↗