journal article·2020-09-01

Surface roughness and material removal rate analyses of hard copper alloy in wire electrical discharge machining

Savas Evran

Emerging Materials Research· Volume 9· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

This experimental and statistical study focuses on investigation of the effects of machining parameters on surface roughness (SR) and material removal rate (MRR) in wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) of hard copper (Cu) alloy. Experimental design was carried out using the L18 (21 × 32) orthogonal array according to the Taguchi method. The process parameters considered were wire type, pulse time and duration between two pulses. Copper-coated wire and zinc (Zn)-coated wires were used as cutting tools. Analysis of the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio was utilized to investigate the effects of process parameters on the responses. Analysis of variance was employed to determine the percent contributions and significance levels of process parameters on responses. Analysis of the surface integrity and characteristics of the machined specimens was observed using scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis was employed. This study may be used as a reference to investigate SR and MRR in WEDM of hard copper alloy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Energy Management, Faculty of Çanakkale Applied Sciences, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.05410.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.054 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.04.01710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.04.017 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00170-006-0672-610.1007/s00170-006-0672-6 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00170-014-6243-310.1007/s00170-014-6243-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60671-410.1016/S0007-8506(07)60671-4 ↗
6. 10.1007/s13369-018-3238-710.1007/s13369-018-3238-7 ↗
7. 10.1007/s13369-016-2145-z10.1007/s13369-016-2145-z ↗
8. 10.1007/s13369-013-0715-x10.1007/s13369-013-0715-x ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.50910.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.509 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.08510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.085 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jestch.2015.03.01410.1016/j.jestch.2015.03.014 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00170-015-7349-y10.1007/s00170-015-7349-y ↗
13. 10.1007/s00170-016-9881-910.1007/s00170-016-9881-9 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00170-015-6797-810.1007/s00170-015-6797-8 ↗
15. Manjaiah M · International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering · 2016 · 11 · 1
16. Evran S · Tehnički Vjesnik · 2019 · 26 · 1228
17. 10.1680/jemmr.17.0006810.1680/jemmr.17.00068 ↗
18. 10.1680/jemmr.17.0006610.1680/jemmr.17.00066 ↗
19. 10.1680/jemmr.16.0012010.1680/jemmr.16.00120 ↗
20. 10.12693/APhysPolA.123.22410.12693/APhysPolA.123.224 ↗
21. 10.12693/APhysPolA.123.42110.12693/APhysPolA.123.421 ↗
22. Amit M · Emerging Materials Research · 2020 · 9 · 42
23. 10.22399/ijcesen.59069210.22399/ijcesen.590692 ↗
24. 10.12693/APhysPolA.129.44210.12693/APhysPolA.129.442 ↗
25. Saglam Metal · 2018
26. 10.1080/10426914.2012.73666110.1080/10426914.2012.736661 ↗
27. Ross PJ · 1996