Effectiveness of treatment methods on polypropylene fibres incorporated in cement mortars
Source abstract
Abstract
Fibre reinforcements are often used in cementitious materials to provide enhanced strength. However, the surface smoothness and inert chemical nature of polypropylene fibres result in an insufficient fibre–matrix bonding interface and hence lead to poor mechanical properties of these materials. Two distinct treatment methods, namely, porofication method and sulfuric acid–dichromate treatment method, are adopted to assess the effectiveness of these techniques on fibre–matrix interface properties. The paper begins with an investigation on the effectiveness of these methods on polypropylene fibres. The wetting characteristics of these fibres are determined using the water absorption test, contact angle measurements and scanning electron microscopy analysis. The study then focuses on the mechanical properties and durability of cement mortars incorporating treated polypropylene fibres. The void ratio, flexural and compressive strengths and split tensile strength are studied, and microstructural analyses are also carried out to support these measurements. The resistance to impact, freeze and thaw and carbonation of cement mortars incorporating treated polypropylene fibres is investigated. The treatment methods adopted in this study improve the interface between the hydrated cement product and fibres and also significantly enhance the mechanical properties and durability of these mortars incorporating polypropylene fibres.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Civil Engineering Department, Center for Sustainability, Middle East Technical University Northern Cyprus Campus, Guzelyurt, North Cyprus
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0079-6700(94)00030-610.1016/0079-6700(94)00030-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.01010.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.010 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.08.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2013.08.004 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0248106410.1007/BF02481064 ↗
5. 10.1002/fam.81017050510.1002/fam.810170505 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0247321410.1007/BF02473214 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.01010.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.010 ↗
8. 10.1617/s11527-008-9361-210.1617/s11527-008-9361-2 ↗
9. Naaman AE · ACI Materials Journal · 2005 · 102 · 49
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.16210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.162 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.00710.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.007 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.01110.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.011 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.06810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.068 ↗
15. Peled A · Cement and Concrete Composites · 1992 · 4 · 14277
16. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.11.01110.1016/j.cemconres.2008.11.011 ↗
17. 10.1016/0958-9465(92)90026-R10.1016/0958-9465(92)90026-R ↗
18. 10.1680/macr.1998.50.3.20910.1680/macr.1998.50.3.209 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:1(2)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:1(2) ↗
20. Petková M · Journal of the Textile Institute · 2017 · 108 · 196
21. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.168-170.145910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.168-170.1459 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.10.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.10.003 ↗
23. Mohebby B · Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology · 2011 · 13 · 877
24. Orchon S · TAPPI · 1958 · 41 · 33
25. ASTM · 2016
26. ASTM · 2014
27. ASTM · 2017
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.02610.1016/j.msea.2008.01.026 ↗
29. ASTM · 2015
30. ASTM · 2017
31. BSI · 2006
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.12710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.127 ↗