Taguchi and ANOVA approach for optimization of flow characteristics of self-compacting concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
Sand-rich self-compacting concrete (SCC) with high volume of fly ash requires specific experimental design for optimized response in freshened state. The analysis of the results of an experimental investigation by Taguchi method for optimization of the effect of size of coarse aggregate and fine aggregate content on the quality characteristics of SCC are presented in this study. Slump flow diameter, V-funnel flow time, U-box rise and segregation index are considered as the response parameters of the freshened SCC. The mixes were designed for a fixed water–powder ratio and aggregate–powder ratio to achieve the desired compressive strength. The basic mix was determined based on mortar trial test and for a larger context of a test program on hardened SCC. The analysis revealed size of coarse aggregate and fine aggregate contents for optimum response of freshened SCC. The individual significant levels of the controlling factors in relation to the specific response characteristics are obtained. Thus, an understanding was developed on how the controlling factors influenced the freshened quality characteristics of SCC with high volume of fly ash and sand content. The confirmation test further verified the optimized results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Scientist, Material and Structural Evaluation Group (MSEG), CSIR-CMERI, Durgapur, West Bengal, India
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Ouchi M. Applications of Self-Compacting Concrete in Japan, Europe & US, 2005, Kochi University of Technology, Kochi, 1–18.
2. 10.3151/jact.1.510.3151/jact.1.5 ↗
3. Ozawa K. · 1989 · 1 · 445
4. Subramanian S. · The Indian Concrete Journal · 2002 · 76 · 13
5. Kumar P. · 2003 · 116
6. Vengalia J. · The Indian Concrete Journal · 2003 · 77 · 1261
7. Das D. · The Indian Concrete Journal · 2006 · 80 · 53
8. Ravindra R. R. · 2003 · 17
9. Kumar P. · The Indian Concrete Journal · 2004 · 78 · 25
10. EFNARC. · 2002
11. Attiogbe E. K. · 2002 · 331
12. Ghezal A. · 2002 · 75
13. Holschemacher K. · 2003 · 1913
14. 10.1680/macr.10.0011810.1680/macr.10.00118 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.10.00310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.10.003 ↗
16. Carette G. G. · ACI Material Journal · 1993 · 90 · 535
17. Johansen K. · 2001 · 303
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:6(427)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:6(427) ↗
19. Ozcan T. · Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences · 2004 · 11 · 63
20. Hinislioglu S. · Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences · 2005 · 12 · 111
21. 10.1590/S1516-1439200800020000810.1590/S1516-14392008000200008 ↗
22. Bureau of Indian Standards. · 1981
23. Bureau of Indian Standards. · 2003
24. Bureau of Indian Standards. · 1999
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.08110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.081 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.010 ↗