Effect of surface roughness on sealing performance of silicone rubber
Source abstract
Abstract
Silicone rubber seals are widely used in the aerospace industry, and the microscopic roughness of the metal surface has a significant effect on sealing performance. In this paper, a sinusoidal profile is used to describe the microscopic topography of the metal surface. Then, a static sealing contact model is developed by the finite-element analysis software Abaqus for analyzing the influence of surface roughness parameters R a and R sm on sealing performance. Results show that the sealing clearance and the maximum contact pressures increase when R a increases. However, the sealing clearance and the maximum contact pressures decrease when R sm increases. With the decrease in R a, the contact ratio increases in the contact interface between rubber and metal surface. When R sm increases, the contact ratio in the contact interface increases. The contact pressure and the stress concentration increase when the surface roughness increases. Thus, it is important to consider the effect of the microscopic roughness in rubber seal design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Rubber Composite Materials and Structures, Harbin Institute of Technology at Weihai, Weihai, China
Shanghai Aerospace Equipments Manufacturer Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
Goertek Inc., Weifang, China
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cja.2014.10.01310.1016/j.cja.2014.10.013 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.09.01810.1016/j.triboint.2015.09.018 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.138862610.1063/1.1388626 ↗
4. Matsuzaki Y · JSME International Journal Series C: Mechanical Systems, Machine Elements and Manufacturing · 1993 · 36 · 119
5. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(20000601)38:11<1485::AID-POLB80>3.0.CO;2-110.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(20000601)38:11<1485::AID-POLB80>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.11.00710.1016/j.triboint.2005.11.007 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.19540910.1103/PhysRevB.70.195409 ↗
8. 10.1115/WTC2005-6363610.1115/WTC2005-63636 ↗
9. 10.1140/epje/e2006-00004-910.1140/epje/e2006-00004-9 ↗
10. 10.4236/jsemat.2011.1301910.4236/jsemat.2011.13019 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.339.14110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.339.141 ↗
12. 10.2346/1.234637510.2346/1.2346375 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cma.2015.08.00310.1016/j.cma.2015.08.003 ↗
14. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) · 1986
15. 10.1007/s12541-012-0099-y10.1007/s12541-012-0099-y ↗
16. 10.1140/epje/i2006-10045-910.1140/epje/i2006-10045-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.triboint.2013.12.00410.1016/j.triboint.2013.12.004 ↗
18. 10.1088/0953-8984/17/1/R0110.1088/0953-8984/17/1/R01 ↗