Gamma-ray-shielding parameters of carbon–aramid epoxy composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Radiation has been one of the most important phenomena since its discovery, and it has been used in different fields. Due to its hazardous effects, it should be shielded, and thus, new alternative materials should be developed. In this study, the radiological parameters of two types of composite materials were calculated at gamma ray energies of 10−3–105 MeV. These gamma-ray-shielding parameters are the mass attenuation coefficient, linear attenuation coefficient, mean free path, half-value layer, tenth-value layer, atomic cross-section, electronic cross-section, effective atomic number (Zeff), effective electron density (Neff), effective conductivity (Ceff), equivalent atomic number (Zeq) and exposure buildup factor of the two different composites. The calculations were done using the Phy-X/PSD software.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies · Nuclear Physics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Chemistry, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Mersin, Turkey
Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.47510.12693/APhysPolA.130.475 ↗
2. 10.12693/APhysPolA.132.99910.12693/APhysPolA.132.999 ↗
3. 10.1155/2014/95097810.1155/2014/950978 ↗
4. 10.22399/ijcesen.19437610.22399/ijcesen.194376 ↗
5. 10.12693/APhysPolA.132.109510.12693/APhysPolA.132.1095 ↗
6. Uyanık NA · Annals of Geophysics · 2010 · 53 · 25
7. Kaplan MF · 1989
8. 10.1007/s13762-019-02240-710.1007/s13762-019-02240-7 ↗
9. 10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-5310.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-53 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10854-021-05776-y10.1007/s10854-021-05776-y ↗
11. 10.12693/APhysPolA.137.56910.12693/APhysPolA.137.569 ↗
12. 10.12693/APhysPolA.137.47710.12693/APhysPolA.137.477 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2010.06.00210.1016/j.jfranklin.2010.06.002 ↗
14. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0009810.1680/jemmr.20.00098 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.10908110.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109081 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.18810.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.188 ↗
17. 10.1155/2014/18679810.1155/2014/186798 ↗
18. 10.12693/APhysPolA.137.55110.12693/APhysPolA.137.551 ↗
19. 10.12693/APhysPolA.137.53910.12693/APhysPolA.137.539 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.08.02010.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.08.020 ↗
21. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0020210.1680/jemmr.20.00202 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jscs.2011.01.00310.1016/j.jscs.2011.01.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.04.02110.1016/j.anucene.2013.04.021 ↗
24. 10.1007/s12517-019-4830-110.1007/s12517-019-4830-1 ↗
25. 10.1088/1402-4896/abbf6e10.1088/1402-4896/abbf6e ↗
26. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0015010.1680/jemmr.20.00150 ↗
27. 10.12693/APhysPolA.137.56910.12693/APhysPolA.137.569 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.net.2020.12.01210.1016/j.net.2020.12.012 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.20710.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.207 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.physb.2017.05.02110.1016/j.physb.2017.05.021 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.10909010.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109090 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.05.00910.1016/j.jpcs.2018.05.009 ↗
33. 10.22399/ijcesen.40823110.22399/ijcesen.408231 ↗
34. 10.12693/APhysPolA.137.56110.12693/APhysPolA.137.561 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.anucene.2012.08.02610.1016/j.anucene.2012.08.026 ↗
36. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0030710.1680/jemmr.20.00307 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2019.11057110.1016/j.chemphys.2019.110571 ↗
38. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0020910.1680/jemmr.20.00209 ↗
39. Şen Baykal D · International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering · 2021 · 7 · 9910.22399/ijcesen.960151 ↗
40. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0029710.1680/jemmr.20.00297 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.10377610.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103776 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10279310.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102793 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.11020810.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110208 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.10995810.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109958 ↗
45. 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01260-y10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01260-y ↗
46. 10.1002/pc.2618510.1002/pc.26185 ↗
47. 10.1080/10420150.2021.197570810.1080/10420150.2021.1975708 ↗
48. 10.22399/ijcesen.101203910.22399/ijcesen.1012039 ↗
49. 10.12693/APhysPolA.132.49010.12693/APhysPolA.132.490 ↗
50. 10.1007/s10967-013-2494-y10.1007/s10967-013-2494-y ↗
51. Akkurt I · International Journal of Radiation Research · 2011 · 9 · 37
52. Waheed F · International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering · 2022 · 8 · 510.22399/ijcesen.1032359 ↗
53. 10.1177/1420326X0607473110.1177/1420326X06074731 ↗
54. 10.22399/ijcesen.49869510.22399/ijcesen.498695 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.07.00810.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.07.008 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.10954010.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109540 ↗
57. 10.1007/s10854-021-05964-w10.1007/s10854-021-05964-w ↗
58. 10.1007/s13762-018-1876-710.1007/s13762-018-1876-7 ↗
59. 10.1088/0256-307X/24/10/02710.1088/0256-307X/24/10/027 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.03.01310.1016/j.matdes.2008.03.013 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.11090010.1016/j.optmat.2021.110900 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.10849610.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108496 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.anucene.2009.09.00510.1016/j.anucene.2009.09.005 ↗