journal article·2020-09-01

Experimental investigation and optimization of welding parameters on weld strength in friction stir spot welding of aluminum using Taguchi experimental design

Memduh Kurtulmuş

Emerging Materials Research· Volume 9· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Nineteen years ago, the automotive industry started using the friction stir spot welding (FSSW) process in joining metallic parts. The popularity of this welding process became higher every year. In this study, aluminum (Al) 1020 sheets of 2 mm thickness were joined with the FSSW process. The effects of FSSW parameters (plunge depth, tool rotation speed and dwell time) on the mechanical properties of weldments were investigated. The mechanical performance of the welds was evaluated by using the lap-shear tensile test. The optimization was done by using the Taguchi method. ‘The-higher-the-better’ quality control characteristic using the analysis of variance (Anova) method was applied to determine the optimum welding parameters. The signal-to-noise ratio was computed to calculate the optimal process parameters. The percentage contributions of each parameter were validated by using the Anova technique. The experimental results were analyzed by using the Minitab 17 software. The tool rotation speed was found as the dominant welding parameter on the weld strength of aluminum 1020 sheets for the FSSW process. The weld that had been produced with the optimum welding parameters gave a 23% higher fracture load than the initial welds.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Applied Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1179/136217110X1278588954946210.1179/136217110X12785889549462 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.09.00410.1016/j.matdes.2007.09.004 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.07.00510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.07.005 ↗
4. Hancock R · Welding Journal · 2004 · 83 · 40
5. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.01710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.017 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01096.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01096.x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.04.04810.1016/j.matlet.2005.04.048 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.04510.1016/j.msea.2005.11.045 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.06.07810.1016/j.procir.2015.06.078 ↗
10. Ross PJ · 1998
11. Peace GS · 1993
12. 10.1080/15287394.2014.91113210.1080/15287394.2014.911132 ↗
13. ASTM · 2009
14. Minitab Inc. · 2016
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.00310.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.003 ↗