1D randomized photonic crystals: influence as single- and dual-channel narrowband filter
Source abstract
Abstract
Nowadays, optical filters with high-level performance are highly demanded. While examining the light transmission properties of both periodic and random one-dimensional (1D) photonic crystals, it is observed that random 1D photonic structures have more favorable properties to meet these demands. With the influence of randomness, novel single- and dual-channel narrowband filters at a 1550 nm wavelength for optical telecommunication are presented in this study. For designing narrowband filters, the central wavelength precision, quality factor and peak transmission are of great importance. Randomness can be attained by permuting the refractive indices of two dielectric materials through the binomial coefficient method, wherein the light transmission properties are calculated using the transfer matrix method. The proposed filters show a minimum full width at half maximum of 0.24 nm in the single-channel narrowband filter and 0.08 and 0.095 nm in the dual-channel narrowband filter at the chosen spectral region. This filters have ultra-narrowband transmission peaks compared with those of existing narrowband filters based on defective 1D photonic structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photonic Crystals and Applications · Photonic and Optical Devices · Fern and Epiphyte Biology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1533/9781845690441.13610.1533/9781845690441.136 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.00555-510.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.00555-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1389-5567(01)00009-010.1016/S1389-5567(01)00009-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.optmat.2017.06.03310.1016/j.optmat.2017.06.033 ↗
5. 10.5772/intechopen.7175310.5772/intechopen.71753 ↗
6. 10.1088/1468-6996/15/3/03480510.1088/1468-6996/15/3/034805 ↗
7. 10.1038/3775710.1038/37757 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.248610.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2486 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRev.109.149210.1103/PhysRev.109.1492 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.11390310.1103/PhysRevLett.94.113903 ↗
11. 10.1080/0001873940010151510.1080/00018739400101515 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.03560210.1103/PhysRevE.74.035602 ↗
13. 10.1364/OE.27.00648310.1364/OE.27.006483 ↗
14. Petcu A · Romanian Reports of Physics · 2009 · 54 · 539
15. 10.1007/s13369-018-3440-710.1007/s13369-018-3440-7 ↗
16. 10.1109/JPHOT.2013.228998810.1109/JPHOT.2013.2289988 ↗
17. Kriegel I · 2014
18. Li J · Optics · 2010 · 283 · 2647
19. 10.3390/ma1107109910.3390/ma11071099 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.physe.2015.12.01210.1016/j.physe.2015.12.012 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.277210.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2772 ↗
22. Bryant V · 1993
23. 10.1017/CBO978113964418110.1017/CBO9781139644181 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.06390510.1103/PhysRevLett.99.063905 ↗
25. 10.1109/JLT.2015.246025910.1109/JLT.2015.2460259 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.16616210.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166162 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.01.12910.1016/j.ijleo.2018.01.129 ↗
28. Hajshahvaladi L · International Journal of Optics and Applications · 2017 · 7 · 49
29. 10.1016/j.mee.2019.04.01610.1016/j.mee.2019.04.016 ↗
30. 10.1364/OE.18.00A33510.1364/OE.18.00A335 ↗
31. 10.1002/advs.20160012310.1002/advs.201600123 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.05661210.1103/PhysRevE.66.056612 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.pquantelec.2010.01.00110.1016/j.pquantelec.2010.01.001 ↗