Deep learning prediction of gamma-ray-attenuation behavior of KNN–LMN ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
The significance and novelty of the present work is the preparation of non-lead ceramics with the general formula of (1 − x)K0.5Na0.5NbO3–xLaMn0.5Ni0.5O3(KNN–LMN) with different values of x (0 < x < 20) (mol%) to examine the shielding qualities of the KNN–LMN ceramics. This is done by carrying out Phy-X/PSD calculation and predicting the attenuation behavior of the samples by utilizing the deep learning (DL) algorithm. From the attained results, it is seen that the higher the x (concentration of LMN in the KNN–LMN lead-free ceramics), the better the shielding proficiency observed in terms of gamma-shielding performance for the chosen KNN–LMN-based lead-free ceramics. In all sections, good agreement is observed between Phy-X/PSD results and DL predictions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hadaf Institution of Higher Education, Sari, Iran; Physics Department, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Industrial Engineering Department, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Turkey
Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey
Faculty of Education, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey
Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey
Engineering Faculty, Beykent University, Istanbul, Turkey
Electrical Engineering Department, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Papanikolaou NC · Medical Science Monitor · 2005 · 11 · RA329
2. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0030710.1680/jemmr.20.00307 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12517-021-08000-710.1007/s12517-021-08000-7 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.anucene.2010.04.00110.1016/j.anucene.2010.04.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.09.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.09.006 ↗
6. 10.12693/APhysPolA.137.47710.12693/APhysPolA.137.477 ↗
7. 10.12693/APhysPolA.137.53910.12693/APhysPolA.137.539 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.07.00810.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.07.008 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.04.02110.1016/j.anucene.2013.04.021 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.anucene.2012.08.02610.1016/j.anucene.2012.08.026 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.anucene.2011.12.03110.1016/j.anucene.2011.12.031 ↗
12. 10.1080/10420150.2021.197570810.1080/10420150.2021.1975708 ↗
13. 10.1680/jemmr.21.0005210.1680/jemmr.21.00052 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2618510.1002/pc.26185 ↗
15. 10.1007/s13762-018-1876-710.1007/s13762-018-1876-7 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10854-021-05776-y10.1007/s10854-021-05776-y ↗
17. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.10954010.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109540 ↗
18. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0020210.1680/jemmr.20.00202 ↗
19. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0020910.1680/jemmr.20.00209 ↗
20. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0015010.1680/jemmr.20.00150 ↗
21. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0018510.1680/jemmr.20.00185 ↗
22. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0029710.1680/jemmr.20.00297 ↗
23. 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01260-y10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01260-y ↗
24. 10.1002/xrs.321010.1002/xrs.3210 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10854-021-05964-w10.1007/s10854-021-05964-w ↗
26. 10.1007/s10854-020-05230-510.1007/s10854-020-05230-5 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.12057210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120572 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.11089710.1016/j.optmat.2021.110897 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.11090010.1016/j.optmat.2021.110900 ↗
30. 10.1088/1402-4896/abbf6e10.1088/1402-4896/abbf6e ↗
31. 10.1016/j.net.2020.12.01210.1016/j.net.2020.12.012 ↗
32. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0009810.1680/jemmr.20.00098 ↗
33. 10.1680/jemmr.21.0004310.1680/jemmr.21.00043 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10854-021-06376-610.1007/s10854-021-06376-6 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.anucene.2009.09.00510.1016/j.anucene.2009.09.005 ↗
36. 10.1515/chem-2022-012710.1515/chem-2022-0127 ↗
37. 10.1515/chem-2022-013110.1515/chem-2022-0131 ↗
38. 10.22399/ijcesen.40823110.22399/ijcesen.408231 ↗
39. 10.1515/chem-2021-011810.1515/chem-2021-0118 ↗
40. Şen Baykal D · International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering · 2021 · 7 · 9910.22399/ijcesen.960151 ↗
41. 10.1515/chem-2022-012510.1515/chem-2022-0125 ↗
42. Waheed F · International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering · 2022 · 8 · 610.22399/ijcesen.1032359 ↗
43. 10.1515/chem-2021-011410.1515/chem-2021-0114 ↗
44. 10.1515/chem-2022-012610.1515/chem-2022-0126 ↗
45. 10.22399/ijcesen.101203910.22399/ijcesen.1012039 ↗
46. 10.1680/jemmr.21.0005210.1680/jemmr.21.00052 ↗
47. 10.1680/jemmr.20.0020910.1680/jemmr.20.00209 ↗
48. 10.1680/jemmr.21.0001110.1680/jemmr.21.00011 ↗
49. Arslankaya S · Emerging Materials Research · 2020 · 9 · 366
50. Demir N · International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering · 2017 · 3 · 4710.22399/ijcesen.323868 ↗
51. 10.22399/ijcesen.19437610.22399/ijcesen.194376 ↗
52. Arslankaya S · International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering · 2021 · 7 · 110.22399/ijcesen.837731 ↗
53. 10.22399/ijcesen.59564510.22399/ijcesen.595645 ↗
54. 10.22399/ijcesen.58926710.22399/ijcesen.589267 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.10849610.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108496 ↗
56. 10.1007/s13042-020-01096-510.1007/s13042-020-01096-5 ↗
57. 10.35377/saucis.02.01.51793010.35377/saucis.02.01.517930 ↗
58. 10.1007/978-3-030-11726-9_3810.1007/978-3-030-11726-9_38 ↗
59. 10.1109/TBME.2020.299352810.1109/TBME.2020.2993528 ↗
60. 10.1109/EMBC.2015.731855310.1109/EMBC.2015.7318553 ↗
61. 10.28945/418410.28945/4184 ↗