Effect of cure parameters on void content and mechanical properties of composite laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of curing parameters including pressure, heating rate, and time on mechanical performance of composite laminates, specifically focusing on interlaminar shear strength (ILSS), flexural properties, and void content. Seven cure cycles were designed and optimized by controlling the following processing parameters during autoclave manufacturing: (a) pressure (0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 MPa), (b) heating rate (0.6, 2.2, and 3.9°C/min), and (c) cure time (90, 120, and 150 min) with autoclave curing applied at 179°C. Seven composite panels were fabricated using these cure cycles to study the effects of the previously mentioned parameters on curing quality. The void content and interlaminar and flexural properties were studied using the ILSS described in EN-2563, the three-point bending method outlined in ASTM-D790, and the determination of the fiber, resin, and void contents specified in EN-2564, along with scanning electron microscopy. Consequently, the most important parameter identified for the ILSS is the void volume fraction. Moreover, void content is highly dependent on pressure throughout the cure cycle. With increased pressure from 0.3 to 0.7 MPa, the void content decreased from 0.29% to 0.12% and the ILSS increased by 10.32%. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significance and correlations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Applications · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye
Department of Metallurgy and Material Engineering, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Nevşehir, Türkiye (corresponding author: ).
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1680/jemmr.22.0004510.1680/jemmr.22.00045 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2314910.1002/pc.23149 ↗
3. 10.1680/jemmr.22.0009210.1680/jemmr.22.00092 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11029-023-10149-z10.1007/s11029-023-10149-z ↗
5. Alpay YO · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · 2023 · 14010.1002/app.53922 ↗
6. Piancastelli L · International Journal Heat & Technology · 2013 · 31 · 17
7. Contreras Lopez J · SN Applied Sciences · 2022 · 4 · 110.1007/s42452-022-05063-3 ↗
8. 10.1002/pen.2520910.1002/pen.25209 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12221-017-7384-410.1007/s12221-017-7384-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/0010-4361(95)96808-J10.1016/0010-4361(95)96808-J ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.14810.1016/j.msea.2007.11.148 ↗
12. 10.1177/002199831142961810.1177/0021998311429618 ↗
13. 10.1007/s12221-017-6606-010.1007/s12221-017-6606-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.014 ↗
15. 10.3390/app1209430710.3390/app12094307 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2641610.1002/pc.26416 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00137-110.1016/S0266-3538(97)00137-1 ↗
19. Hoa S · 2009
20. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00157-910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00157-9 ↗
21. 10.1080/09276440.2016.123711310.1080/09276440.2016.1237113 ↗
22. 10.1177/09673911170250050610.1177/096739111702500506 ↗
23. 10.1177/00219983870210050210.1177/002199838702100502 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60091-X10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60091-X ↗
25. 10.1007/s12221-014-2404-010.1007/s12221-014-2404-0 ↗
26. 10.1177/002199831877215210.1177/0021998318772152 ↗
27. Campbell FC (2003) Manufacturing Processes for Advanced Composites. Elsevier Inc. pp. 1–517.
28. 10.1007/s00170-021-07838-110.1007/s00170-021-07838-1 ↗