Thermal performance of mortars/concretes containing calcined marl as alternative pozzolan
Source abstract
Abstract
The solutions to the increasing problem regarding the energy demand of the world have been expected from the building sector with their consumption of a high amount of energy. Producing environmentally friendly and energy-efficient blended cements and using materials with high thermal performance in terms of insulation and thermal energy storage in buildings are some of these solutions. Calcined marl at the optimum temperature is an alternative pozzolan for blended cement production. The main purpose of this study is to determine how the thermal performance and mechanical properties of mortar/concrete are affected by using calcined marl as alternative pozzolan. For this purpose, mortars/concretes containing calcined marl blended cements were produced. The calcined marl replacement ratios of blended cements were 0, 10, 30 and 50 wt.%. In the study, the strengths and thermal performances of mortars/concretes containing calcined marl blended cements were determined. The test results were compared among themselves and with each other. From the test results, it was concluded that the thermal performances of the mortars/concretes containing calcined marl blended cements could be improved up to 50% replacement ratio without compromising the strength of considered materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Hygrothermal properties of building materials · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Science, Renewable Energy, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. IEA · 2019
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.021 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.12310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.123 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.03.02810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.03.028 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.17010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.170 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.01710.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.017 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.32410.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.324 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11932610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119326 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.10595910.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105959 ↗
11. 10.2478/ncr-2020-001510.2478/ncr-2020-0015 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.04.00710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.04.007 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.00710.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.007 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.04.01510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.04.015 ↗
15. Akgün Y · Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering · 2020 · 64 · 1087
16. 10.24012/dumf.49213710.24012/dumf.492137 ↗
17. TSE (Turkish Standards Institution) · 2012
18. TS · 2016
19. TSE · 2011
20. TSE · 2013
21. TSE · 2010
22. TSE · 2010
23. TSE · 2019
24. TSE · 2019
25. ACI (American Concrete Institute) · 2009
26. TSE · 1989
27. TSE · 2017
28. DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung) · 1976
29. TSE · 2006
30. Devecioğlu AG · Dicle University Journal of Engineering Faculty · 2012 · 3 · 75
31. Incropera FP · 2007
32. TSE · 2006
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.30010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.300 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.clay.2017.07.01810.1016/j.clay.2017.07.018 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.013 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.clay.2018.12.02110.1016/j.clay.2018.12.021 ↗
37. 10.1080/1748093090273194310.1080/17480930902731943 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.02510.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.025 ↗
39. 10.1177/174425911037661310.1177/1744259110376613 ↗
40. 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140306.3010.11648/j.ijmsa.20140306.30 ↗
41. Justnes H · 2011 · 1 · 750
42. 10.1016/j.clay.2018.06.03010.1016/j.clay.2018.06.030 ↗