journal article·2021-03-01

Films based on Salvia hispanica and clove oil: physical, optical and mechanical properties

Jorge Carlos Ruiz-Ruiz, Maira Rubi Segura-Campos

Emerging Materials Research· Volume 10· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Clove essential oil (CEO) was added to Salvia hispanica mucilage–protein-rich fraction in an attempt to design a natural and biodegradable packaging film with good physical, optical and mechanical properties. The effects of polymer concentration (PC) (1.0–3.0%, w/v), CEO concentration (0.1–1.0%, v/v) and pH (7–10) were evaluated using a face-centered central composite design. The films corresponding to treatment with intermediate PC (2.0%, w/w), pH (8.5) and higher concentration of CEO (1.0%, w/w) exhibited a lower water content, were partially soluble and showed adequate thickness and density. With regard to optical characteristics, the films were bright and transparent and exhibited high values of the whiteness index. Under the same conditions, films with suitable mechanical properties were obtained. This formulation is tentatively suggested for application in food products.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Escuela de Nutrición, Universidad Anáhuac Mayab, Mérida, Mexico

Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Mexico

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.02.01410.1016/j.carbpol.2009.02.014 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.00610.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.006 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.lwt.2013.11.03410.1016/j.lwt.2013.11.034 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.11.01310.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.11.013 ↗
5. 10.1094/CCHEM.1997.74.2.14110.1094/CCHEM.1997.74.2.141 ↗
6. 10.1590/S0103-5053200600050000510.1590/S0103-50532006000500005 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11947-016-1717-y10.1007/s11947-016-1717-y ↗
8. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) · 1997
9. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb03246.x10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb03246.x ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb04625.x10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb04625.x ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb09880.x10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb09880.x ↗
12. 10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00722.x10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00722.x ↗
13. 10.1177/87560879970130040510.1177/875608799701300405 ↗
14. ASTM · 2000
15. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.05.02010.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.05.020 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.02910.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.029 ↗
17. 10.1111/1750-3841.1201510.1111/1750-3841.12015 ↗
18. Galus S · Food Technology and Biotechnology · 2013 · 51 · 403
19. 10.1007/s11947-009-0208-910.1007/s11947-009-0208-9 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.01.00410.1016/j.carbpol.2004.01.004 ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01282.x10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01282.x ↗
22. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.04.01510.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.04.015 ↗
23. Polnaya FJ · Asian Journal of Food and Agro-industry · 2012 · 5 · 183
24. 10.15578/jpbkp.v2i1.3010.15578/jpbkp.v2i1.30 ↗