Replication of surface nano-structure of the wing of dragonfly (Pantala Flavescens) using nano-molding and UV nanoimprint lithography
Source abstract
Abstract
The hydrophobicity of a dragonfly’s wing originates from the naturally occurring nano-structure on its surface. The nano-structure on a dragonfly’s wing consists of an array of nano-sized pillars, 100 nm in diameter. We re-create this hydrophobicity on various substrates, such as Si, glass, curved acrylic polymer, and flexible PET film, by replicating the nano-structure using UV curable nano-imprint lithography (NIL) and PDMS molding. The success of the nano-structure duplication was confirmed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The hydrophobicity was measured by water-based contact angle measurements. The water contact angle of the replica made of UV cured polymer was 135° ± 2°, which was slightly lower than that of the original dragonfly’s wing (145° ± 2°), but much higher than that of the UV cured polymer surface without any nano-sized pillars (80°). The hydrophobicity was further improved by applying a coating of Teflon-like material.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. X. Gao and L. Jiang, Nature 432, 36 (2004).10.1038/432036a ↗
2. F. Shi, Z. Wang, and X. Zhang, Adv. Mater. 17, 1005 (2005).10.1002/adma.200402090 ↗
3. B. Yurdumakan, N. R. Raravikar, P. M. Ajayanand, and A. Dhinojwala, Chem. Commun. 30, 3799 (2005).10.1039/b506047h ↗
4. L. Qu and L. Dai, Adv. Mater. 19, 3844 (2007).10.1002/adma.200700023 ↗
5. L. Jiang, Y. Zhao, and J. Zhai, Angew. Chem. 116, 4438 (2004).10.1002/ange.200460333 ↗
6. Z. Guo and W. Liu, Plant Sci. 172, 1103 (2007).10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.03.005 ↗
7. L. Feng, S. Li, Y. Li, H. Li, L. Zhang, J. Zhai, Y. Song, B. Liu, L. Jiang, and D. Zhu, Adv. Mater. 14, 1857 (2002).10.1002/adma.200290020 ↗
8. S. N. Gorb, A. Kesel, and J. Berger, Arth. Struct. Dev. 29, 129 (2000).10.1016/S1467-8039(00)00020-7 ↗
9. X. J. Feng and L. Jiang, Adv. Mater. 18, 3063 (2006).10.1002/adma.200501961 ↗
10. T. Sun, L. Feng, X. Gao, and L. Jiang, Acc. Chem. Res. 38, 644 (2005).10.1021/ar040224c ↗
11. P. Wagner, C. Neinhuis, and W. Barthlott, Acta. Zoologica. 77, 213 (1996).10.1111/j.1463-6395.1996.tb01265.x ↗
12. M. W. Holdgate, J. Exp. Biol. 32, 591 (1955).10.1242/jeb.32.3.591 ↗
13. G. S. Watson, B. W. Cribb, and J. A. Watson, Plos. One. 6, e24368 (2011).10.1371/journal.pone.0024368 ↗
14. S. C. Oh, Electron. Mater. Lett. 8, 485 (2012).10.1007/s13391-012-2053-7 ↗
15. H. Lee and G.-Y. Jung, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43, 8369 (2004).10.1143/JJAP.43.8369 ↗
16. G. Y. Jung, S. Ganapathiappan, X. Li, D. A. A. Ohlberg, D. L. Olynick, Y. Chen, W. M. Tong, and R. S. Williams, Appl. Phys. A7, 1169 (2004).10.1007/s00339-003-2393-0 ↗