journal article·2022-09

Interfacial Adhesion Energies of Uniformly Self-Formed Cr2O3 Barriers for Advanced Co Interconnects

Seongi Lee, Soon-Gyu Hwang, Gahui Kim, Cheol Kim, Woobin Kwon, Young-Bae Park, Young-Chang Joo

Electronic Materials Letters· Volume 18· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The effects of Cr doping and postannealing on the interfacial adhesion energies between a Co interconnect and a SiO2 dielectric layer prepared by physical vapor deposition were systematically evaluated using a four-point bending test. Co, as a promising interconnect due to its scalability, is vulnerable to electromigration on its interface because the poor adhesion energy between Co and a barrier metal provides a diffusion path for atoms. To solve this problem, we suggest doping of Cr, which easily diffuses from the Co metal to the Co/SiO2 interface during postannealing, to form a uniformly distributed layer on the Co interface. Atomic force microscopy analysis clearly showed uniformly segregated Cr at the Co–Cr/SiO2 interface without hillocks or voids. The roughness root mean square values of annealed Co/TiN/Ti, annealed Co-4.7 at% Cr, and annealed Co-7.5 at% Cr were 0.72, 0.18, and 0.21 nm, respectively. In the four-point bending test, Co-4.7 at% Cr/SiO2 and Co-7.5 at% Cr/SiO2 were not delaminated at their interface, unlike pure Co and Co with the conventional barrier metal, which were delaminated at the interface with SiO2. In the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of the Co–Cr/SiO2 interface, an increase in Cr–O bonding was clearly detected after annealing. Therefore, a properly annealed Cr2O3 self-forming barrier with strong interfacial reliability appears to be a promising diffusion barrier for Co interconnects. Graphical abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Semiconductor materials and devices · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen, F., Gardner, D.: Influence of line dimensions on the resistance of Cu interconnections. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 19, 508 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/55.73576210.1109/55.735762 ↗
2. Kapur, P., Chandra, G., McVittie, J.P., Saraswat, K.C.: Technology and reliability constrained future copper interconnects. II. Performance implications. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices. 49, 598 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/16.99286810.1109/16.992868 ↗
3. Gall, D.: J. Appl. Phys. 119 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.494221610.1063/1.4942216 ↗
4. Choi, D., Barmak, K.: On the potential of tungsten as next-generation semiconductor interconnects. Electron. Mater. Lett. 13, 449 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-017-1610-510.1007/s13391-017-1610-5 ↗
5. Murarka, S.P., Hymes, S.W.: Copper metallization for ULSL and beyond. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 20, 87 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/1040843950824373210.1080/10408439508243732 ↗
6. Edelstein, D., Heidenreich, J., Goldblatt, R., Cote, W., Uzoh, C., Lustig, N., Roper, P., McDevitt, T., Motsiff, W., Simon, A., Dukovic, J., Wachnik, R., Rathore, H., Schulz, R., Su, L.: Full copper wiring in a sub-0.25 /spl mu/m CMOS ULSI technology. Tech. Dig. Int. Electron. Devices Meet IEDM. 5, 773 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.1997.65049610.1109/IEDM.1997.650496 ↗
7. Fuchs, K.: Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 34, 100 (1938)10.1017/S0305004100019952 ↗
8. Sondheimer, E.H.: The mean free path of electrons in metals. Adv. Phys. 1, 1 (1952)10.1080/00018735200101151 ↗
9. Mayadas, A.F., Shatzkes, M., Janak, J.F.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 14, 345 (1969)10.1063/1.1652680 ↗
10. Mayadas, A.F., Shatzkes, M.: Electrical-Resistivity Model for Polycrystalline Films The Case of Arbitrary Reflection at External Surfaces (1970). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.1.13810.1103/PhysRevB.1.138 ↗
11. Gall, D.: J. Appl. Phys. 127 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.513367110.1063/1.5133671 ↗
12. Dutta, S., Beyne, S., Gupta, A., Kundu, S., Van Elshocht, S., Bender, H., Jamieson, G., Vandervorst, W., Bommels, J., Wilson, C.J., Tokei, Z., Adelmann, C.: Sub-100 nm2 Cobalt Interconnects. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 39, 731 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2018.282192310.1109/LED.2018.2821923 ↗
13. Hu, C.K., Kelly, J., Huang, H., Motoyama, K., Shobha, H., Ostrovski, Y., Chen, J.H.C., Patlolla, R., Peethala, B., Adusumilli, P., Spooner, T., Quon, R., Gignac, L.M., Breslin, C., Lian, G., Ali, M., Benedict, J., Lin, X.S., Smith, S., Kamineni, V., Zhang, X., Mont, F., Siddiqui, S., Baumann, F.: in IEEE Int. Reliab. Phys. Symp. Proc. pp. 4F.11-4F.16. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/IRPS.2018.835359710.1109/IRPS.2018.8353597 ↗
14. Mont, F.W., Zhang, X., Wang, W., Kelly, J.J., Standaert, T.E., Quon, R., Ryan, E.T.: Electromigration and resistivity in on-chip Cu, Co and Ru damascene nanowires. IEEE Int. Interconnect. Technol. Conf. 7, 2017–2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IITC-AMC.2017.796897710.1109/IITC-AMC.2017.7968977 ↗
15. Griggio, F., Palmer, J., Pan, F., Toledo, N., Schmitz, A., Tsameret, I., Kasim, R., Leatherman, G., Hicks, J., Madhavan, A., Shin, J., Steigerwald, J., Yeoh, A., Auth, C.: IEEE Int. Reliab. Phys. Symp. Proc. 2018-March, 6E.31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/IRPS.2018.835364110.1109/IRPS.2018.8353641 ↗
16. Hu, C.K., Kelly, J., Chen, J.H.C., Huang, H., Ostrovski, Y., Patlolla, R., Peethala, B., Adusumilli, P., Spooner, T., Gignac, L.M., Bruley, J., Breslin, C., Cohen, S.A., Lian, G., Ali, M., Long, R., Hornicek, G., Kane, T., Kamineni, V., Zhang, X., Mont, F., Siddiqui, S.: IEEE Int. Interconnect. Technol. Conf. 4, 2017–2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IITC-AMC.2017.796897710.1109/IITC-AMC.2017.7968977 ↗
17. Lane, M.W., Liniger, E.G., Lloyd, J.R.: J. Appl. Phys. 93, 1417 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.153294210.1063/1.1532942 ↗
18. Saraswat, K., Cho, H., Kapur, P., Koo, K.H.: Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst. 2781 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2008.454203410.1109/ISCAS.2008.4542034 ↗
19. Lloyd, J.R., Lane, M.W., Liniger, E.G., Hu, C.K., Shaw, T.M., Rosenberg, R.: Electromigration and adhesion. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 5, 113 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TDMR.2005.84630810.1109/TDMR.2005.846308 ↗
20. Ciofi, I., Roussel, P.J., Baert, R., Contino, A., Gupta, A., Croes, K., Wilson, C.J., Mocuta, D., Tokei, Z.: RC benefits of advanced metallization options. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices. 66, 2339 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2019.290203110.1109/TED.2019.2902031 ↗
21. Koike, J., Wada, M.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 041911 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.199375910.1063/1.1993759 ↗
22. Moon, D.Y., Han, D.S., Park, J.H., Shin, S.Y., Park, J.W., Kim, B.M., Cho, J.Y.: Plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition of Cu–Mn films with formation of a MnSixOy barrier layer. Thin Solid Films. 521, 146 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2012.02.01510.1016/j.tsf.2012.02.015 ↗
23. Lee, H., Jeong, M., Kim, G., Son, K., Seo, J., Kim, T-S., Park, Y.B.: Effects of Post-annealing and Co Interlayer Between SiNx and Cu on the Interfacial Adhesion Energy for Advanced Cu Interconnections. Electron. Mater. Lett. 16, 311 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-020-00210-710.1007/s13391-020-00210-7 ↗
24. Yi, S-M., Choi, I-S., Kim, B-J., Joo, Y-C.: Reliability Issues and Solutions in Flexible Electronics Under Mechanical Fatigue. Electron. Mater. Lett. 14, 387 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-018-0043-010.1007/s13391-018-0043-0 ↗
25. Huang, C-L., Lai, C-H., Tsai, P-H., Kuo, Y-L., Lin, J-C., Lee, C.: Thermal stability, adhesion and electrical studies on (Ti,Zr)N x thin films as low resistive diffusion barriers between Cu and Si. Electron. Mater. Lett. 10, 551 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-013-3145-810.1007/s13391-013-3145-8 ↗
26. Kim, C., Kang, G., Jung, Y., Kim, J.-Y., Lee, G.-B., Hong, D., Lee, Y., Hwang, S-G., Jung, I-H., Joo, Y-C.: Robust Co Alloy Design for Co Interconnects using a Self-Forming Barrier Layer. Sci. Rep. 12, 12291 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16288-y10.1038/s41598-022-16288-y ↗
27. Dauskardt, R.H., Lane, M., Ma, Q., Krishna, N.: Adhesion and debonding of multi-layer thin film structures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 61, 141 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-610.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-6 ↗
28. Charalambides, P.G., Lund, J., Evans, A.G., McMeeking, R.M.: A test specimen for determining the fracture resistance of bimaterial interfaces. J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME. 56, 77 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.317606910.1115/1.3176069 ↗
29. Agostinelli, E., Battistoni, C., Fiorani, D., Mattogno, G., Nogues, M.: An XPS study of the electronic structure of the ZnxCd1−xCr2(X = S, Se) spinel system. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 50, 269 (1989)10.1016/0022-3697(89)90487-3 ↗
30. Mischler, S., Mathieu, H.J., Landolt, D.: Surf. Interface Anal. 12, 429 (1988)10.1002/sia.740120712 ↗
31. Conner, G.R.: J. Vac Sci. Technol. 15, 343 (1978)10.1116/1.569543 ↗
32. Desimoni, E., Malitesta, C., Zambonin, P.G., Rivière, J.C.: An x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of some chromium–oxygen systems. Surf. Interface Anal. 13, 173 (1988)10.1002/sia.740130210 ↗