Preparation and Xylene Gas Sensing Performances of SnO2/Fe2(MoO4)3 Nanocomposites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Yu, D.J., Oum, W., Mirzaei, A., et al.: Enhancement of xylene gas sensing by using Au core structures in regard to Au@SnO2core-shell nanocomposites. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 392, 134018 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.13401810.1016/j.snb.2023.134018 ↗
2. Tshabalala, Z.P., Mokoena, T.P., Hillie, K.T., et al.: Improved BTEX gas sensing characteristics of thermally treated TiO2 hierarchical spheres manifested by high-energy {001} crystal facets. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 338, 129774 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.12977410.1016/j.snb.2021.129774 ↗
3. Hjiri, M.: Strategies to detect xylene gas using chemoresistive gas sensors: an overview. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 139, 56–73 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.05.00910.1016/j.jiec.2024.05.009 ↗
4. Nascimento, E.P., Firmino, H.C.T., Neves, G.A., et al.: A review of recent developments in tin dioxide nanostructured materials for gas sensors. Ceram. Int. 48(6), 7405–40 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.12310.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.123 ↗
5. Duan, P., Wang, H., Peng, Q., et al.: Ultra-effective room temperature gas discrimination based on monolithic Pd@MOF-derived porous nanocomposites: an exclusive scheme with photoexcitation. J. Mater. Chem. A 12(7), 3896–909 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ta05740b10.1039/d3ta05740b ↗
6. Zhang, D., Yang, Z., Yu, S., et al.: Diversiform metal oxide-based hybrid nanostructures for gas sensing with versatile prospects. Coord. Chem. Rev. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.21327210.1016/j.ccr.2020.213272 ↗
7. Zheng, Z., Liu, K., Zhou, Y., et al.: Spinel type MCo2O4(M = Mn, Mg, Ni, Cu, Fe and Zn) for chemoresistance gas sensors. Mater. Today Chem. 36, 101928 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2024.10192810.1016/j.mtchem.2024.101928 ↗
8. Meena, D., Jain, M., Bhatnagar, M.C.: Resistive gas sensors based on nanostructured ternary metal oxide: a review. J. Mater. Sci. 59(27), 12177–218 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09903-y10.1007/s10853-024-09903-y ↗
9. Sivaperuman, K., Thomas, A., Thangavel, R., et al.: Binary and ternary metal oxide semiconductor thin films for effective gas sensing applications: a comprehensive review and future prospects. Progress Mater. Sci. 142, 101222 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.10122210.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101222 ↗
10. Dutta, A., Adhikari, S., Johari, P., et al.: Unleashing the power of Fe2(MoO4)3as a multifunctional material for energy storage and photocatalysis with theoretical insight from density functional theory. J. Energy Storage (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.11108210.1016/j.est.2024.111082 ↗
11. Ai, T., Zhang, J., Li, J., et al.: Ultrafast response of Pt functionalized Fe2(MoO4)3nanoflower gas sensors for ultra-low ppm level H2gas detection. J. Alloys Compd. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17256710.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172567 ↗
12. Ray, S.K., Hur, J.: A review on monoclinic metal molybdate photocatalyst for environmental remediation. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 101, 28–50 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.06.02710.1016/j.jiec.2021.06.027 ↗
13. Qiu, Y., Yang, C., Zhou, H., et al.: Enriched Surface Oxygen Vacancies of Fe2(MoO4)3Catalysts for a PDS-Activated photoFenton System. Molecules (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2801033310.3390/molecules28010333 ↗
14. Lin, Z., Xu, M., Hong, Y., et al.: Surfactant-free hydrothermal synthesis and gas-sensing properties of NaBi(MoO4)2nanocrystals. Mater. Lett. 168, 72–5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.01.03810.1016/j.matlet.2016.01.038 ↗
15. Liu, J., Lv, J., Xiong, H., et al.: Size effect and comprehensive mathematical model for gas-sensing mechanism of SnO2thin film gas sensors. J. Alloys Compd. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16287510.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162875 ↗
16. Liu, J., Lv, J., Shi, J., et al.: Size effects of tin oxide quantum dot gas sensors: from partial depletion to volume depletion. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9(6), 16399–409 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.10710.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.107 ↗
17. Van Hoang, N., Hung, C.M., Hoa, N.D., et al.: Enhanced H2S gas-sensing performance of α-Fe2O3 nanofibers by optimizing process conditions and loading with reduced graphene oxide. J. Alloys Compd. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15416910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154169 ↗
18. Walker, J.M., Akbar, S.A., Morris, P.A.: Synergistic effects in gas sensing semiconducting oxide nano-heterostructures: a review. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 286, 624–40 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.01.04910.1016/j.snb.2019.01.049 ↗
19. Xu, H.-Y., Chen, Z.-R., Liu, C.-Y., et al.: Preparation of {200} crystal faced SnO2nanorods with extremely high gas sensitivity at lower temperature. Rare Metals 40(8), 2004–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-021-01720-510.1007/s12598-021-01720-5 ↗
20. Zhu, C., Guo, W., Du, F., et al.: One-pot synthesis of NaBi(MoO4)2nanorods and their gas-sensing properties. Mater. Lett. 220, 172–4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.04310.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.043 ↗
21. Gao, P., Wang, H., Li, X., et al.: Flower-like SnO2nanorod aggregates modified with Co3O4 nanoparticles grown on reduced graphene oxide(rGO) sheets for xylene sensing. J. Alloys Compd. 1004, 175774 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17577410.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175774 ↗
22. Lin, Z., Xu, M., Fu, P., et al.: Crystal plane control of 3D iron molybdate and the facet effect on gas sensing performances. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 254, 755–62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.07.10110.1016/j.snb.2017.07.101 ↗
23. Xing, Y., Zhang, L.-X., Li, C.-T., et al.: Pt decoration and oxygen defects synergistically boosted xylene sensing performance of polycrystalline SnO2 nanosheet assembled microflowers. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 354, 131220 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.13122010.1016/j.snb.2021.131220 ↗
24. Tshabalala, Z.P., Mokoena, T.P., Jozela, M., et al.: TiO2 nanowires for humidity-stable gas sensors for toluene and xylene. ACS Appl. Nano. Mater. 4(1), 702–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c0296310.1021/acsanm.0c02963 ↗
25. Wang, D., Cheng, Y., Wan, K., et al.: High efficiency xylene detection based on porous MoO3nanosheets. Vacuum 179, 109487 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10948710.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109487 ↗
26. Cao, P., Gui, X., Pawar, D., et al.: Highly ordered mesoporous V2O5 nanospheres utilized chemiresistive sensors for selective detection of xylene. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 265, 115031 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2020.11503110.1016/j.mseb.2020.115031 ↗
27. Gao, H., Yu, Q., Chen, K., et al.: Ultrasensitive gas sensor based on hollow tungsten trioxide-nickel oxide (WO3-NiO) nanoflowers for fast and selective xylene detection. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 535, 458–68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.01010.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.010 ↗
28. Guo, M., Luo, N., Chen, Y., et al.: Fast-response MEMS xylene gas sensor based on CuO/WO3 hierarchical structure [J]. J. Hazard. Mater. 429, 127471 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12747110.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127471 ↗
29. Zhang, N., Li, F., Yin, Y., et al.: Gas sensor based on TiO2nanofibers decorated with monodispersed WO3nanocubes for fast and selective xylene detection [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 263, 114901 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2020.11490110.1016/j.mseb.2020.114901 ↗
30. Gao, H., Guo, J., Li, Y., et al.: Highly selective and sensitive xylene gas sensor fabricated from NiO/NiCr2O4 p-p nanoparticles [J]. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 284, 305–15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.15210.1016/j.snb.2018.12.152 ↗
31. Wu, H., Zhou, Y., Guo, J., et al.: Highly sensitive and selective xylene sensor based on p-p heterojunctions composites derived from off-stoichiometric cobalt tungstate [J]. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 351, 130973 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.13097310.1016/j.snb.2021.130973 ↗
32. Wang, D., Mi, Q., Zhang, H., et al.: Sensitive xylene gas sensor based on NiO-NiCo 2 O 4 hierarchical spherical structure constructed with nanorods. IEEE Sen. J. 22(11), 10346–52 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2022.316880310.1109/jsen.2022.3168803 ↗
33. Zhu, Y., Ma, S., Yang, Y., et al.: Direct Z-scheme Fe2(MoO4)3/MoO3 heterojunction: photo-fenton reaction and mechanism comprehension [J]. J. Alloys Compd. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15983010.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159830 ↗
34. Yang, H., Liu, C., Liu, L., et al.: Construction of SnO2nanoparticles modified Bi/MoO3nanosheets heterojunctions for fast response and highly selective ethanol sensing performance [J]. J. Alloys Compd. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.17897710.1016/j.jallcom.2025.178977 ↗