journal article·2015-01

Combined study on conductive AFM and damascene process to visualize Nano-Scaled defects in Cr thin films on polymer substrate

Eun-Wook Jeong, Se-Hun Kwon, Haedo Jeong, Youngson Choe, Young-Rae Cho

Electronic Materials Letters· Volume 11· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The evolution of a direct observation technique for small-sized defects in a thin film is important in understanding of a water-vapor barrier layers. An investigation into the availability of direct observation techniques for detecting nano-scaled defects in a chromium thin film on a polymer substrate was performed. The best images of nano-scaled defects in Cr thin films were obtained using conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) in conjunction with a damascene process. When a dielectric Al2O3 layer was filled into the defects, such as voids or grain boundaries, in the Cr coating via this damascene process, a distinctive conductivity image was obtained from C-AFM. The major role of the dielectric material of the Al2O3 layer, when filled into the nano-scaled defects in the Cr coating, was the generation of different values in conductivity during the C-AFM analysis. The results confirmed that the combination of C-AFM and the filling of the dielectric Al2O3 layer into the defects via the damascene process is a useful method for the direct observation of nano-scaled defects comprised of deep and narrow trenches in metallic thin films on a polymer substrate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Semiconductor materials and devices · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. E. Kim, Y. Han, W. Kim, K. C. Choi, H. G. Im, and B. S. Bae, Org. Electron. 14, 1737 (2013).10.1016/j.orgel.2013.04.011 ↗
2. M. Hermenau, S. Schubert, H. Klumbies, J. Fahlteich, L. M. Meskamp, K. Leo, and M. Riede, Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 97, 102 (2012).10.1016/j.solmat.2011.09.026 ↗
3. J. H. Kim, J. Y. Cho, J. Park, B. K. Lee, K. H. Baek, H. Lee, and L. M. Do, Electron. Mater. Lett. 10, 27 (2014).10.1007/s13391-013-3059-5 ↗
4. H. Ham, J. Park, and Y. Kim, Org. Electron. 12, 2174 (2011).10.1016/j.orgel.2011.09.010 ↗
5. K. Mckenna and A. Shluger, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 222111 (2009).10.1063/1.3271184 ↗
6. T. Kobayashi, I. Uchiyama, A. Kimura, S. Oka, and Y. Kitagawara, J. Cryst. Growth 210, 112 (2000).10.1016/S0022-0248(99)00662-4 ↗
7. W. Ludwig and D. Bellet, Mater. Sci. Eng. A281, 198 (2000).10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00733-9 ↗
8. Y. Zhang, J. A. Bertrand, R. Yang, S. M. George, and Y. C. Lee, Thin Solid Films 517, 3269 (2009).10.1016/j.tsf.2008.12.052 ↗
9. U. Celano, R. C. Chintala, C. Adelmann, O. Richard, and W. Vandervorst, Microelectron. Eng. 109, 318 (2013).10.1016/j.mee.2013.03.147 ↗
10. A. Minj, D. Cavalcoli, and A. Cavallini, Physica B 407, 2838 (2012).10.1016/j.physb.2011.08.035 ↗
11. P. Macech and J. E. Pemberton, Thin Solid Films 517, 5399 (2009).10.1016/j.tsf.2009.01.057 ↗
12. J. Alvarez, I. Ngo, M. E. Gueunier-Farret, J. P. Kleider, L. Yu, P. R. Cabarrocas, S. Perraud, E. Rouviere, C. Celle, C. Mouchet, and J. P. Simonato, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6, 110 (2011).10.1186/1556-276X-6-110 ↗
13. S. Brandstetter, V. Carreau, S. Maitrejeon, M. Verdier, and M. Legros, Microelectron. Eng. 87, 383 (2010).10.1016/j.mee.2009.05.033 ↗
14. D. Y. Choi, S. J. Han, N. H. Kim, and S. Y. Kim, Microelectron. Eng. 87, 343 (2010).10.1016/j.mee.2009.07.004 ↗
15. Y. H. Chang, S. M. Wang, C. M. Liu, and C. Chen, J. Electrochem. Soc. 157, K236 (2010).10.1149/1.3489953 ↗
16. S. Han, H. J. Kim, M. K. Hong, B. H. Kwon, K. Lee, and Y. Ko, Electron. Mater. Lett. 9, 155 (2013).10.1007/s13391-012-2144-5 ↗
17. Y. K. Lee, M. Maniruzzaman, C. Lee, M. J. Lee, E. G. Lee, and J. Lee, Electron. Mater. Lett. 9, 741 (2013).10.1007/s13391-013-6004-8 ↗