Effect of Al pre-deposition on AlN buffer layer and GaN film grown on Si (111) substrate by MOCVD
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the effect of Al pre-deposition time on GaN crystal quality. The GaN layer was grown on a Si (111) substrate by metal organic chemical vapor deposition using an AlN buffer layer. Atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction were used to evaluate film growth. Consequently, we found significant differences in the epitaxial properties of the AlN buffer and GaN layer, which were dependent on the Al pre-deposition time. When the deposition time was 0 s, the AlN buffer layer was very smooth, but the GaN layer did not have a high crystal quality. At a Al pre-deposition time of 60 s, the AlN buffer started to be transformed into a rough surface and the GaN layer had both a mirror-like surface and better crystal quality. When the Al pre-deposition time was greater than 120 s, GaN surfaces had a high roughness. In addition, the surface morphology of the GaN had not coalesced. Based on these results, the optimized Al pre-deposition time was found to be essential to achieve an appropriate surface roughness for high crystal quality of GaN.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Nakamura, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2 30, L1705 (1991).10.1143/JJAP.30.L1705 ↗
2. S. Guha and N. A. Bojarczuk, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 415 (1998).10.1063/1.120775 ↗
3. A. Dadgar, J. Blasing, A. Diez, A. Alam, M. Heuken, and A. Krost, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2 39, L1183 (2000).10.1143/JJAP.39.L1183 ↗
4. M. H. Oliver, J. L. Schroeder, D. A. Ewoldt, I. H. Wildeson, V. Rawat, R. Colby, P. R. Cantwell, E. A. Stach, and T. D. Sands, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 023109 (2008).10.1063/1.2953541 ↗
5. M. A. Moram, M. J. Kappers, Z. H. Barber, and C. J. Humphreys, J. Cryst. Growth 298, 268 (2007).10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.10.027 ↗
6. C. M. Rouleau, S. Kang, and D. H. Lowndes, Appl. Phys. A 69, S441 (1999).10.1007/s003390051434 ↗
7. R. Armitage, Q. Yang, H. Feick, J. Gebauer, E. R. Weber, S. Shinkai, and K. Sasaki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1450 (2002).10.1063/1.1501447 ↗
8. J. Komiyama, Y. Abe, S. Suzuki, and H. Nakanishi, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 033519 (2006).10.1063/1.2226988 ↗
9. J. Park, J.-S. Ha, S.-K. Hong, S. W. Lee, M. W. Cho, T. Yao, H. W. Lee, S. H. Lee, S.-K. Lee, and H.-J. Lee, Electron. Mater. Lett. 8, 135 (2012).10.1007/s13391-012-1076-4 ↗
10. A. Dadgar, F. Schulze, M. Wienecke, A. Gadanecz, J. Bläsing, P. Veit, T. Hempel, A. Diez, J. Christen, and A. Krost, New J. Phys. 9, 389 (2007).10.1088/1367-2630/9/10/389 ↗
11. A. Watanabe, T. Takeuchi, K. Hirosawa, H. Amano, K. Hiramatsu, and I. Akasaki, J. Cryst. Growth 128, 391 (1993).10.1016/0022-0248(93)90354-Y ↗
12. P. Chen, R. Zhang, Z. M. Zhao, D. J. Xi, B. Shen, Z. Z. Chen, Y. G. Zhou, S. Y. Xie, W. F. Lu, and Y. D. Zheng, J. Cryst. Growth 225, 150 (2001).10.1016/S0022-0248(01)00842-9 ↗
13. J. Cao, S. Li, G. Fan, Y. Zhang, S. Zheng, Y. Yin, J. Huang, and J. Su, J. Cryst. Growth 312, 2044 (2010).10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.03.032 ↗
14. J. O. Kim, S. K. Hong, and K. Y. Lim, Phys. Status Solid. C 7, 2052 (2010).10.1002/pssc.200983497 ↗
15. A. Krost and A. Dadgar, Phys. Status Solidi. A 194, 361 (2002).10.1002/1521-396X(200212)194:2<361::AID-PSSA361>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
16. S. Pal and C. Jacob, B. Mater. Sci. 27, 501 (2004).10.1007/BF02707276 ↗
17. M. Grundmann, A. Krost, and D. Bimberg, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 284 (1991).10.1063/1.104662 ↗
18. S. Tanaka, Y. Kawaguchi, N. Sawaki, M. Hibino, and K. Hiramatsu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2701 (2000).10.1063/1.126448 ↗