journal article·2014-07

Effects of gallia addition on sintering behavior and electrical conductivity of yttria-doped ceria

Seung-Woo Seo, Ji-Hoon Park, Min-Woo Park, Ji-Hoon Koo, Ki-Tae Lee, Joo-Sin Lee

Electronic Materials Letters· Volume 10· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The densification behavior and electrical conductivity of Ce0.8Y0.2O1.9 ceramics with gallia concentrations ranging from 0 to 5 mol. % were investigated. The sintered density was found to increase with increasing Ga2O3 content up to 1 mol. % and then to decrease upon further Ga2O3 addition. Dense Ce0.8Y0.2O1.9 ceramics with 94% of the theoretical density could be obtained by sintering the milled mixture with 1 mol. % Ga2O3 addition at 1400°C for 5 h. The conductivity of the 1 mol. % Ga2O3-added specimen showed a maximum value of 1.37 × 10−2 Ω−1· cm−1 at 700°C. Pure Ce0.8Y0.2O1.9 ceramics needed to be sintered at 1550°C in order to obtain an equivalent theoretical density and conductivity. The introduction of Ga2O3 doping had a good effect on the sintering properties and electrical conductivities of Y2O3-doped CeO2.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. H. Inaba and H. Tagawanaba, Solid State Ionics 83, 1 (1996).10.1016/0167-2738(95)00229-4 ↗
2. J. V. Herle, T. Horita, T. Kawada, N. Sakai, H. Yokokawa, and M. Dokiya, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 933 (1997).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02924.x ↗
3. A. L. Dragoo and L. P. Domingues, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65, 253 (1982).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10428.x ↗
4. J. Ma, T. S. Zhang, L. B. Kong, P. Hing, Y. J. Leng, and S. H. Chan, J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 24, 2641 (2004).10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2003.09.023 ↗
5. M. Biswas, K. Prabhakaran, N. M. Gokhale, and S. C. Sharma, Mater. Res. Bull. 42, 609 (2007).10.1016/j.materresbull.2006.08.017 ↗
6. H. M. Xu, H. G. Yan, and Z. H. Chen, Mater. Character. 59, 301 (2008).10.1016/j.matchar.2007.01.017 ↗
7. K. Yamashita, K. V. Ramanujachary, and M. Greenblatt, Solid State Ionics 81, 53 (1995).10.1016/0167-2738(95)99031-H ↗
8. L. Gao, M. Zhou, Y. Zheng, H. Gu, H. Chen, and L. Guo, J. Power Sources 195, 3130 (2010).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.117 ↗
9. S. W. Seo, S. J. Jung, M. W. Park, S. M. Yu, K. T. Lee, and J. S. Lee, Electron. Mater. Lett. 10, 213 (2014).10.1007/s13391-013-3026-1 ↗
10. H. Yoshida, K. Miura, J. Fujita, and T. Inagaki, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 219 (1999).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01747.x ↗
11. J. S. Lee, K. H. Choi, B. K. Ryu, B. C. Shin, and I. S. Kim, Mater. Res. Bull. 39, 2025 (2004).10.1016/j.materresbull.2004.07.022 ↗
12. J. S. Lee, K. H. Choi, B. K. Ryu, B. C. Shin, and I. S. Kim, J. Mater. Sci. 40, 1153 (2005).10.1007/s10853-005-6931-3 ↗
13. P. L. Chen and I. W. Chen, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 1793 (1996).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb07997.x ↗
14. K. Eguchi, T. Setoguchi, T. Inoue, and H. Arai, Solid State Ionics 52, 165 (1992).10.1016/0167-2738(92)90102-U ↗