journal article·2019

Annealing of Proton and Alpha Particle Damage in Au-W/β-Ga2O3 Rectifiers

Minghan Xian, Chaker Fares, Jinho Bae, Jihyun Kim, Fan Ren, S. J. Pearton

Publisher page

Abstract

Vertical geometry Ga2O3 rectifiers were irradiated with 18 MeV alpha particles to fluences of 1–3 × 1013 cm−2 or 10 MeV protons to fluences of 1–3 × 1014 cm−2 and then annealed to establish the thermal stability of the radiation damage. The rectifiers employed Au/W rectifying contacts to achieve the requisite thermal stability to allow for annealing studies. The carrier removal rates were ∼900 cm−1 for the α-particles and ∼200 for the protons. Annealing at 500°C was found to restore the carrier concentration in the α-particle irradiated devices, while 450°C annealing brought substantial recovery of the proton irradiated devices. This is a similar temperature range as established for annealing of plasma-induced damage in Ga2O3, suggesting a common origin of point defects, predominantly Ga vacancies and their complexes. The reverse breakdown voltages and diode on/off ratios are also significantly recovered by annealing after irradiation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ga2O3 and related materials · ZnO doping and properties · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1361-6641/aadf7810.1088/1361-6641/aadf78 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.500694110.1063/1.5006941 ↗
3. Stepanov · Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 44 · 63
4. 10.1149/2.0031707jss10.1149/2.0031707jss ↗
5. 10.1002/aelm.20160035010.1002/aelm.201600350 ↗
6. 10.1002/aelm.20160050110.1002/aelm.201600501 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.501784510.1063/1.5017845 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.506284110.1063/1.5062841 ↗
9. 10.1142/S012915641940007X10.1142/S012915641940007X ↗
10. Bayraktaroglu B. , Assessment of Ga2O3 Technology, Air Force Research Lab, Devices for Sensing Branch, Aerospace Components & Subsystems Division, Report AFRL-RY-WP-TR-2017-0167 (2017).
11. 10.1142/S012915641940002010.1142/S0129156419400020 ↗
12. 10.1142/S012915641940004410.1142/S0129156419400044 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.503444410.1063/1.5034444 ↗
14. 10.1109/LED.2017.270360910.1109/LED.2017.2703609 ↗
15. 10.1149/2.0241805jss10.1149/2.0241805jss ↗
16. 10.1186/s11671-018-2849-y10.1186/s11671-018-2849-y ↗
17. 10.1063/1.510025610.1063/1.5100256 ↗
18. 10.1109/LED.2018.283018410.1109/LED.2018.2830184 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.spmi.2018.04.04510.1016/j.spmi.2018.04.045 ↗
20. 10.7567/APEX.10.12420110.7567/APEX.10.124201 ↗
21. Li W. Hu Z. Nomoto K. Jinno R. Zhang Z. Tu T. Q. Sasaki K. Kuramata A. Jena D. Xing H. G. , 2.44 kV Ga2O3 vertical trench Schottky barrier diodes with very low reverse leakage current, 2018 IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), pp. 8.5.1 (2018)10.1109/IEDM.2018.8614693 ↗
22. 10.1109/LED.2018.287571410.1109/LED.2018.2875714 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.500719710.1063/1.5007197 ↗
24. 10.1109/LED.2018.283018410.1109/LED.2018.2830184 ↗
25. 10.1116/1.512751110.1116/1.5127511 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.498320310.1063/1.4983203 ↗
27. 10.1109/LED.2017.270360910.1109/LED.2017.2703609 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.497785710.1063/1.4977857 ↗
29. 10.1039/C6TC02467J10.1039/C6TC02467J ↗
30. 10.1149/2.0231708jss10.1149/2.0231708jss ↗
31. 10.1109/JSTQE.2014.232151710.1109/JSTQE.2014.2321517 ↗
32. 10.1143/APEX.1.01120210.1143/APEX.1.011202 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0148610.1021/acsphotonics.7b01486 ↗
34. 10.1116/1.494836110.1116/1.4948361 ↗
35. 10.1364/OE.27.00871710.1364/OE.27.008717 ↗
36. 10.1002/adom.20180156310.1002/adom.201801563 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20170026410.1002/adfm.201700264 ↗
38. 10.1039/C8TC01122B10.1039/C8TC01122B ↗
39. 10.1116/1.495087210.1116/1.4950872 ↗
40. 10.1109/TNS.2017.269883110.1109/TNS.2017.2698831 ↗
41. 10.1116/1.498337710.1116/1.4983377 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.505460610.1063/1.5054606 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.7b1388110.1021/acsami.7b13881 ↗
44. Yang · Sci. Technol. B · 2017 · 35 · 051201
45. 10.1116/1.501315510.1116/1.5013155 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.501299310.1063/1.5012993 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.501197110.1063/1.5011971 ↗
48. 10.1002/pssa.20160044710.1002/pssa.201600447 ↗
49. 10.1149/2.0251602jss10.1149/2.0251602jss ↗
50. 10.1109/TNS.2012.222437110.1109/TNS.2012.2224371 ↗
51. 10.5573/JSTS.2019.19.2.21410.5573/JSTS.2019.19.2.214 ↗
52. 10.1109/TNS.2013.228611510.1109/TNS.2013.2286115 ↗
53. 10.1039/C8TC04193H10.1039/C8TC04193H ↗
54. 10.1116/1.502761310.1116/1.5027613 ↗
55. 10.1116/1.512500610.1116/1.5125006 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.492281410.1063/1.4922814 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.498381410.1063/1.4983814 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.500709510.1063/1.5007095 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.24520210.1103/PhysRevB.95.245202 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.502591610.1063/1.5025916 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.349930610.1063/1.3499306 ↗
62. 10.1149/2.0421907jss10.1149/2.0421907jss ↗
63. 10.1109/JEDS.2018.287749510.1109/JEDS.2018.2877495 ↗