When AI Writes, Reviews, and Reads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Artificial Intelligence Applications · Digital Humanities and Scholarship
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Kabel, S. A. Bibliography of genAI-Fueled Research Fraud from 2025. https://sharonkabel.com/genai-fraud (last accessed February 16, 2026).
2. Recommendations for a Classification of AI Use in Academic Manuscript Preparation. The International Association of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers (STM). https://stm-assoc.org/document/recommendations-for-a-classification-of-ai-use-in-academic-manuscript-preparation/ (last accessed February 16, 2026).
3. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Best Practices and Policies at ACS Publications. https://researcher-resources.acs.org/publish/aipolicy (last accessed February 16, 2026).
4. 10.1038/d41586-025-03967-910.1038/d41586-025-03967-9 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aee837710.1126/science.aee8377 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0258610.1021/acsenergylett.3c02586 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.6c0049010.1021/acsnano.6c00490 ↗
8. 10.1038/d41586-025-04066-510.1038/d41586-025-04066-5 ↗
9. 10.1038/d41586-025-03506-610.1038/d41586-025-03506-6 ↗
10. Lauer, M.; Constant, S.; Wernimont, A. Using AI in Peer Review Is a Breach of Confidentiality, NIH Center for Scientific Review. 2023, https://www.csr.nih.gov/reviewmatters/2023/06/23/using-ai-in-peer-review-is-a-breach-of-confidentiality/ (last accessed February 16, 2026).
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.5c0350910.1021/acsenergylett.5c03509 ↗